The Grammar of Polarity

Pragmatics, Sensitivity, and the Logic of Scales

The Grammar of Polarity

Many languages include constructions which are sensitive to the expression of polarity: that is, negative polarity items, which cannot occur in affirmative clauses, and positive polarity items, which cannot occur in negatives. The phenomenon of polarity sensitivity has been an important source of evidence for theories about the mental architecture of grammar over the last fifty years, and to many the oddly dysfunctional sensitivities of polarity items have seemed to support a view of grammar as an encapsulated mental module fundamentally unrelated to other aspects of human cognition or communicative behavior. This book draws on insights from cognitive/functional linguistics and formal semantics to argue that, on the contrary, the grammar of sensitivity is grounded in a very general human cognitive ability to form categories and draw inferences based on scalar alternatives, and in the ways this ability is deployed for rhetorical effects in ordinary interpersonal communication.


 Reviews:

Advance Quote: “Michael Israel's magisterial study of the scalar foundations of polarity confirms beyond the slightest shadow of a doubt that little things do mean a lot. With clarity, elegance and wit, Israel pries open the black box of polarity licensing (no mean feat!) to demonstrate the role of scalar models at the at the heart of emphasis, attenuation, and rhetorical effects. This book is essential--and delightful--reading for all linguists, philosophers, and cognitive scientists with an interest in meaning and understanding.” --Laurence Horn, Yale University

Anscombre, J.-C. & O. Ducrot . 1983. L'Argumentation dans la langue. Bruxelles: Mardaga.
Aranovich, R. 1996. “Negation, polarity, and indefiniteness: a comparative study of negative constructions in Spanish and English.” Ph.D. dissertation, UC San Diego.
Atlas, J. D. 1984. “Comparative adjectives and adverbials of degree: an introduction to radically radical pragmatics.” Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 347–77.
Atlas, J. D. 1996. “‘Only’ noun phrases, pseudo-negative generalized quantifiers, negative polarity items, and monotonicity.” Journal of Semantics 13: 265–330.
Atlas, J. D. Atlas, J. D. & S. C. Levinson . 1981. “It-clefts, informativeness, and logical form: radical pragmatics (revised standard version).” In P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 1–61.
Austin, J. L. [1956] 1970. “Ifs and cans.” In J. O. Urmson & G. J. Warnock (eds.), Philosophical Papers. Clarendon: Oxford University Press, 205–32.
Baker, C. L. 1970. “Double negatives.” Linguistic Inquiry 1: 169–86.
Barker, C. 1995. Possessive Description. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Barlow, M. & S. Kemmer . 2000. Usage-Based Models of Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Barwise, J. & R. Cooper . 1981. “Generalized quantifiers and natural language.” Linguistics and Philosophy 4.2: 150–219.
Beaver, D. I. & B. Z. Clark . 2003. “Always and only: why not all focus sensitive operators are alike.” Natural Language Semantics 11: 323–62.
Beaver, D. I. 2007. Sense and Sensitivity: How Focus Determines Meaning. Malden, MA / Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Bender, E. & A. Kathol . 2001. “Constructional effects of just because … doesn't mean.” In BLS 27, Berkeley: University of California, 13–25.
Benveniste, E. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Editions Gallimard.
Bergen, B. & N. Chang . 2005. “Embodied construction grammar.” In J.-O. Östman & M. Fried (eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 147–90.
Bernini, G. 1987. “Attempting the reconstruction of negation patterns in PIE.” In A. G. Ramat , O. Carruba & G. Bernini (eds.), Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 57–69.
Birner, B. & G. Ward (eds.) 2006. Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bolinger, D. 1960. “Linguistic science and linguistic engineering.” Word 16: 374–91.
Bolinger, D. 1972. Degree Words. The Hague: Mouton.
Borkin, A. 1971. “Polarity items in questions.” In CLS 7. Chicago: CLS, 53–62.
Bosque, I. 1980. Sobre la negación. Madrid: Cátedra.
Bouvier, Y.-F. 2002. “A featural account of polarity phenomena.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Geneva.
Bowerman, M. 1988. “The ‘no negative evidence’ problem: how do children avoid constructing an overly general grammar?” In J. A. Hawkins (ed.), Explaining Language Universals. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 73–101.
Bréal, M. [1900] 1964. Semantics: Studies in the Science of Meaning. Trans. Mrs. H. Cust . New York: Dover Publications.
Braine, M. 1971. “On two types of models of the internalization of grammars.” In D. I. Slobin (ed.), The Ontogenesis of Grammar: A Theoretical Symposium. New York: Academic Press, 153–86.
Brown, P. & S. Levinson . 1978. “Universals in language usage: politeness phenomena.” In E. Goody (ed.), Questions and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 56–289. Reissued as a monograph: Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
Buyssens, E. 1959. “Negative contexts.” English Studies 40: 163–69.
Bybee, J. , R. Perkins & W. Pagliuca . 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bybee, J. 1985. Morphology: A Study of the Relation Between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam/Philadelphia; John Benjamins.
Bybee, J. 2001. Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Caffi, C. & R. W. Janney . 1994. “Toward a pragmatics of emotive communication.” Journal of Pragmatics 22: 325–73.
Carlson, G. 1980. “Polarity any is existential.” Linguistic Inquiry 11: 799–804.
Carlson, G. 1981. “Distribution of free-choice any.” In CLS 17. Chicago: CLS, 8–23.
Carnap, R. 1942. Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Carston, R. 1995. “Quantity maxims and generalized implicature.” Lingua 96: 213–44.
Carston, R. 1996. “Metalinguistic negation and echoic use.” Journal of Pragmatics 25: 309–30.
Carston, R. 1998. “Informativeness, relevance, and scalar implicature.” In R. Carston & S. Uchida (eds.), Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 179–236.
Carston, R. 2002. “Linguistic meaning, communicated meaning and cognitive pragmatics.” Mind and Language. Special Issue on Pragmatics & Cognitive Science 17.1–2: 127–48.
Chierchia, G. 2004. “Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena, and the syntax/pragmatics interface.” In A. Belleti (ed.), Structures and Beyond. New York: Oxford University Press, 39–103.
Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of a Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clark, H. H. 1996. Using Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cormack, A. & N. Smith . 2002. “Modals and negation in English.” In S. Barbiers , F. Beukema & W. van der Wurff (eds.), Modality and Its Interaction with the Verbal System. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 133–64.
Coulson, S. 2001. Semantic Leaps: Frame-Shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Crain, S. & P. Pietroski . 2002. “Why language acquistion is a ‘snap’.” The Linguistic Review 19: 163–183.
Croft, W. & D. A. Cruse . 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Croft, W. 1991. “The evolution of negation.” Journal of Linguistics 27: 1–27.
Croft, W. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Cutrer, M. 1994. “Time and tense in narrative and in everyday language.” Ph.D. dissertation, UC San Diego.
Davidson, D . 1967. “Truth and meaning.” Synthese 17: 304–23.
Davison, A. 1980. “Any as universal or existential.” In J. Van der Auwera (ed.), The Semantics of Determiners. London: Croom Helm, 11–40.
Dayal, V. 1998. “Any as inherent modal.” Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 433–76.
Dayal, V. 2004. “The universal force of free choice any.” Linguistic Variation Yearbook 4: 5–40.
De Boer, A. , J. de Jong & R. Landeweerd (eds.) 1993. Language and Cognition 3: Yearbook 1993 of the Research Group for Theoretical and Experimental Linguistics. Groningen: TENK.
de Haan, F. 1997. The Interaction of Modality and Negation: A Typological Study. New York/London: Garland.
de Swart, H. 1996. “Meaning and use of not…until.” Journal of Semantics 13.3: 221–63.
Declerck, R. 1995. “The problem of not … until.” Linguistics 33: 51–98.
den Dikken, M. 2002. “Direct and indirect polarity item licensing.” Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5: 35–66.
Dowty, D. 1991. “Thematic proto-roles and argument selection.” Language 67.3: 547–619.
Dowty, D. 1994. “The role of negative polarity and concord marking in natural language reasoning.” In M. Harrey & L. Santelmann (eds.), SALT IV. Ithaca: Dept. of Modern Languages and Liguistics, Cornell University, 114–44.
Ducrot, O. 1972. Dire et ne pas dire. Paris: Hermann.
Ducrot, O. 1973. La Preuve et le dire. Paris: Maison Mame.
Ducrot, O. 1980. Les Échelles argumentatives. Paris: Minuit.
Duffley, P. J . & P. Larrivee . 2010. “Anyone for non-scalarity?” English Language and Linguistics 14.1: 1–17.
Duffley, P. J. 1994. “Need and dare: the black sheep of the modal family.” Lingua 94: 213–43.
Edmondson, J. A. 1981. “Affectivity and gradient scope.” In CLS 17. Chicago: CLS, 38–44.
Edmondson, J. A. 1983. “Polarized auxiliaries.” In F. Heny and B. Richards (eds.), Linguistic Categories: Auxiliaries and Related Puzzles, Vol. I. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 49–68.
Emanatian, M. 1983. “Everything you always wanted to no.” Unpublished ms., UC Berkeley.
Falkenberg, G. 2001. “Lexical sensitivity in negative polarity verbs.” In Hoeksema et al. (eds.), 79–97.
Farkas, D. 2002. “Extreme non-specificity in Romanian.” In C. Beyssade, R. Bok-Bennema , F. Drijkoningen & P. Monachesi (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2000. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 127–51.
Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner . 2002. The Way We Think. New York: Basic Books.
Fauconnier, G. 1975a. “Polarity and the scale principle.” In R. E. Grossman , L. J. San & T.J. Vance (eds.), CLS 11. Chicago: CLS, 188–199.
Fauconnier, G. 1975b. “Pragmatic scales and logical structures.” Linguistic Inquiry 6: 353–75.
Fauconnier, G. 1978. “Implication reversal in a natural language.” In F. Guenther & S. J. Schmidt (eds.), Formal Semantics and Pragmatics for Natural Languages. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 289–301.
Fauconnier, G. 1980. “Pragmatic entailment and questions.” In J. R. Searle , F. Kiefer & M. Bierwisch (eds.), Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 57–71.
Fauconnier, G. 1985. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press. Republished, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Fauconnier, G. 1997. Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, G. [1976] 1980. Etude de certains aspects logiques et grammaticaux de la quantification et de l'anaphore en français et en anglais. Lille: Atelier Reproduction des Thèses.
Fillmore, C. J. , P. Kay & M. C. O'Connor . 1988. “Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: the case of let alone.” Language 64: 501–38.
Fillmore, C. J. 1982. “Frame semantics.” In The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanshin, 111–37.
Fillmore, C. J. 1985. “Frames and the semantics of understanding.” Quaderni di Semantica 6: 222–54.
Fintel, K. von. 1999. “NPI-licensing, strawson-entailment, and context dependency.” Journal of Semantics 16: 97–148.
Fintel, K. von. 2006. “Modality and Language.” In D. Borchert (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd edn. Detroit: MacMillan Reference USA.
Forget, D. , P. Hirschbühler , F. Martineau & M. L. Rivero (eds.) 1997. Negation and Polarity: Syntax and Semantics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Francescotti, R. M. 1995. “Even: the conventional implicature approach reconsidered.” Linguistics and Philosophy 18: 153–73.
Gaatone, D. 1971. Etude descriptive du système de la négation en français contemporain. Geneva: Librairie Droz.
Garrido, J. 1992. “Expectations in Spanish and German adverbs of change.” Folia Linguistica 26: 357–402.
Gazdar, G . 1979. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form. New York: Academic Press.
Geis, M. & W. G. Lycan . 1993. “Nonconditional conditionals.” Philosophical Topics 21: 35–55.
Geis, M. 1995. Speech Acts and Conversational Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Giannakidou, A. 1998. Polarity Sensitivity as (Non)Veridical Dependency. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Giannakidou, Anastasia 1999. “Affective dependencies.” Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 367–421.
Giannakidou, Anastasia 2001. “The meaning of free choice.” Linguistics and Philosophy 24: 659–735.
Giannakidou, Anastasia 2005. “Conjunctions and universal quantifiers.” In M. Haspelmath , M. Dryer , D. Gil & B. Comrie (eds.), World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 230–3.
Giannakidou, Anastasia 2006. “Only, emotive factive verbs, and the dual nature of polarity dependency.” Language 82.3: 575–603.
Gill, D. 1994. “Conjunctive operators in South-Asian languages.” In A. Davison & F. M. Smith (eds.), Papers from the Fifteenth South Asian Language Analysis Roundtable Conference, Iowa City: South Asian Studies Program, University of Iowa, 82–105.
Givón, T . 1995. Functionalism and Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Goffman, E. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
Goldberg, A . 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, Adele 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford/ New York: Oxford University Press.
Gordon, D. & G. Lakoff . 1971. “Conversational postulates.” In CLS 7: 63–84.
Grady, J. 2005. “Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration.” Journal of Pragmatics 37: 1595–614.
Green, L. J. 2002. African American English: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grice, H. P. 1975. “Logic and conversation.” In P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics. Vol.III: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 41–58.
Guerzoni, E. 2004. “Even-NPIs in yes/no questions.” Natural Language Semantics 12: 319–34.
Hübler, A. 1983. Understatements and Hedges in English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Hamilton, Sir W. 1858. Discussions on Philosophy and Literature. New York: Harper and Brothers.
Hankamer, J. 1973. “Why there are two than's in English.” In CLS 9. Chicago: CLS, 179–91.
Haspelmath, M. 1997. Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford / New York: Oxford University Press.
Heim, I. 1984. “A note on negative polarity and downward entailingness.” In C. Jones & P. Sells (eds.), NELS 14. University of Massachusetts, Amherst: GLSA, 98–107.
Heinämäki, O. 1974. Semantics of English Temporal Connectives. Reproduced by Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1978.
Herburger, E. 2000. What Counts: Focus and Quantification. Lingusitic Inquiry, Monograph 36. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hinds, M. 1974. “Doubleplusgood polarity items.” In CLS 10. Chicago: CLS, 259–68.
Hirschberg, J. B. 1985. “A theory of scalar implicature.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Hoeksema, J . & H. Rullmann . 2001. “Scalarity and polarity: a study of scalar adverbs as polarity items.” In Hoeksema et al. (eds.), 129–71.
Hoeksema, J. , H. Rullmann , V. Sánchez Valencia & T. van der Wouden (eds.) 2001. Perspectives on Negation and Polarity Items. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hoeksema, J. 1983. “Negative polarity and the comparative.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1: 403–34.
Hoeksema, J. 1986. “Monotonicity phenomena in natural language.” Linguistic Analysis 16: 25–40.
Hoeksema, J. 1994. “On the grammaticalization of negative polarity items.” In S. Gahl , A. Dalbey & C. Johnson (eds.), BLS 20. Berkeley: University of California, 273–82.
Hoeksema, J. 1996. “Review of Progovac,” 1994 Studies in Language: 196–207.
Hoeksema, J. 1997. “In days, weeks, months, years, ages: a class of temporal negative polarity items.” ms., Groningen University.
Hoeksema, J. 1998. “Corpus studies of negative polarity items.” In M. T. Turell & E. Vallduvi (eds.), IV-V Jornades de corpus lingüístics 1996–1997. Barcelona: Institut Universitari Lingüística Aplicada, 67–86.
Hoeksema, J. 2000. “Negative polarity items: triggering, scope and c-command.” In Horn & Kato (eds.), 115–46.
Hoeksema, J. 2007. “Parasitic licensing of negative polarity items.” Journal of Comparative German Linguistics 10: 163–82.
Horn, L. R. & G. Ward (eds.) 2004. The Handbook of Pragmatics. Basil: Blackwell Publishers.
Horn, L. R. & Y. Kato . (eds.) 2000. Negation and Polarity: Syntactic and Semantic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Horn, L. R. & Young-Suk Lee . 1995. “Progovac on polarity.” Journal of Linguistics 31: 401–24.
Horn, L. R. 1969. “A presuppositional analysis of only and even.” In R. I. Binnick , A. Davison , G. M. Green & J. L. Morgan (eds.), CLS 5. Chicago: CLS, 98–107.
Horn, L. R. 1970. “Ain't it hard anymore.” In CLS 6. Chicago: CLS, 318–27.
Horn, L. R. 1971. “Negative transportation: unsafe at any speed?” In CLS 7. Chicago: CLS, 120–33.
Horn, L. R. 1972. “On the semantic properties of logical operators in English”. Ph.D. dissertation, UC Los Angeles, distributed by IULC, 1976.
Horn, L. R. 1978. “Some aspects of negation.” In J. Greenberg , C. Ferguson & E. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of Human Language, Vol IV: Syntax. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 127–210.
Horn, L. R. 1984. “Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature.” In Schiffrin (ed.), 11–42.
Horn, L. R. 1985. “Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity.” Language 61: 121–74.
Horn, L. R. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago / London: University of Chicago Press.
Horn, L. R. 1991. “Duplex negatio affirmat …: the economy of double negation.” In Lise M. Dobrin , Lynn Nichols & Rosa M. Rodriguez (eds.), CLS: Papers from the Parasession on Negation, 27, 2. Chicago: CLS, 80–106.
Horn, L. R. 1996. “Exclusive company: only and the dynamics of vertical inference.” Journal of Semantics 13: 1–40.
Horn, L. R. 1997. “All John's children are as bald as the King of France: existential import and the geometry of opposition.” In K. Singer , R. Eggert & G. Anderson (eds.), CLS 33. Chicago: CLS, 155–80.
Horn, L. R. 2000a. “Pick a theory (not just any theory): indiscriminatives and the free choice indefinite.” In Horn & Kato (eds.), 147–92.
Horn, L. R. 2000b. “Any and (-)ever: free choice and free relatives.” In A. Wyner (ed.), Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Israeli Association for Theoretical Linguistics (IATL), 71–111.
Horn, L. R. 2000c. “From if to iff: conditional perfection as pragmatic strengthening.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 289–326.
Horn, L. R. 2001. “Flaubert triggers, squatitive negation, and other quirks of grammar.” In Hoeksema et al. (eds.), 173–200.
Horn, L. R. 2002. “Assertoric inertia and scalar inference.” In M. Andronis , E. Deberport , A. Pycha & K. Yeshimura (eds.), Proceedings of the Panels of the CLS 38, 2. Chicago: CLS, 55–82.
Horn, L. R. 2005. “Airport '86 revisited: toward a unified indefinite any.” In G. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (eds.), The Partee Effect. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 179–205.
Horn, L. R. forthcoming. “ONLY connect: how to unpack an exclusive proposition.” In M. Hackl & R. Thornton (eds.), A Festschrift for Jay Atlas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Huddleston, R. & G. K. Pullum . 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Israel, M. 1995a. “Negative polarity and phantom reference.” In BLS 21. Berkeley: University of California, 162–73.
Israel, M. 1995b. “Review of Negative Contexts by Ton van der Wouden.” Glot International 1.5: 10–12.
Israel, M. 1996. “Polarity sensitivity as lexical semantics.” Linguistics and Philosophy 19: 619–666.
Israel, M. 1997. “The scalar model of polarity sensitivity: the case of the aspectual operators.” In Forget et al. (eds.), 209–29.
Israel, M. 1998a. “The rhetoric of grammar: scalar reasoning and polarity sensitivity.” Ph.D. dissertation, UC San Diego.
Israel, M. 1998b. “Ever: polysemy and polarity sensitivity.” Linguistic Notes from La Jolla 19: 29–45.
Israel, M. 1999. “Some and the pragmatics of indefinite construal.” In BLS 25. Berkeley: University of California, 169–82.
Israel, M. 2001. “Minimizers, maximizers, and the rhetoric of scalar reasoning.” Journal of Semantics 18.4: 297–331.
Israel, M. 2002. “Literally speaking.” Journal of Pragmatics 34: 423–32.
Israel, M. 2004. “The pragmatics of polarity.” In Horn & Ward (eds.), 701–23.
Israel, M. 2006. “Saying less and meaning less.” In Birner & Ward (eds.), 143–62.
Jackson, E. 1994. “Negative polarity, definites under quantification and general statements.” Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
Jacobson, P. 2006. “I can't seem to figure this out.” In Birner & Ward (eds.), 157–76.
Jayez, J. & L. M. Tovena . 2005. “Free choiceness and non-individuation.” Linguistics and Philosophy 28.1: 1–71.
Jennings, R. E. 1994. The Geneology of Disjunction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jespersen, O. 1917. Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhagen: A. F. Host.
Jespersen, O. 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: George Allen & Unwin, Ltd.
Johannessen, J. B. 2003. “Negative polarity verbs in Norwegian.” Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 71: 33–73.
Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
König, E. & E. C. Traugott . 1982. “Divergence and apparent convergence in the development of yet and still.” In BLS 8. Berkeley: University of California, 170–9.
König, E. 1977. “Temporal and non-temporal uses of noch and schon in German.” Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 173–98.
König, E. 1991. The Meaning of Focus Particles: A Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.
Kadmon, N. & F. Landman . 1993. “Any.” Linguistics and Philosophy 16: 353–422.
Karttunen, L. & S. Peters . 1979. “Conventional implicature.” In C.-K. Oh & D. A. Dineen (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol II: Presupposition. New York: Academic Press, 1–56.
Karttunen, L. 1974. “Until.” CLS 10: 284–97.
Kas, M. 1993. Essays on Boolean Functions and Negative Polarity. Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics 11. Groningen: Center for Language and Cognition Groningen.
Katz, J. J. 1977. Propositional Structure and Illocutionary Force. New York: Crowell.
Kay, P. & C. J. Fillmore . 1999. “Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: the what's X doing Y construction.” Language 75: 1–34.
Kay, P. 1983. “Linguistic competence and folk theories of language: two English hedges.” In BLS 9. Berkeley: University of California, 128–37.
Kay, P. 1989. “Contextual operators: respective, respectively, and vice versa.” In BLS 15. Berkeley: University of California, 181–93.
Kay, P. 1990. “Even.” Linguistics and Philosophy 13: 59–111.
Kay, P. 1997. Words and the Grammar of Context. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publication.
Kirsner, R. S. 1993. “From meaning to message in two theories: cognitive and Saussurean views of the modern Dutch demonstratives.” In R. Geiger & B. Rudzka-Ostyn (eds.), Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language. Cognitive Linguistics Research 3. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 81–114.
Klein, H. 1998. Adverbs of Degree in Dutch and Related Languages. Linguistik Aktuell, vol. 21. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Klima, E. S. 1964. “Negation in English.” In J. Fodor and J. Katz (eds.), The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 246–323.
Koenig, J.-P. 1999. Lexical Relations. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Kratzer, A. 1991. “Modality.” In A. von Stechow & D. Wunderlich (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin: de Gruyter, 639–50.
Krifka, M. , G. Carlson , F. J. Pelletier , A. ter Meulen , G. Chierchia & G. Links . 1995. “Genericity: an introduction.” In G. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1–124.
Krifka, M. 1992. “Some remarks on polarity items.” In D. Zaefferer (ed.), Semantic Universals and Universal Semantics. Dordrecht: Foris, 150–89.
Krifka, M. 1994. “The semantics and pragmatics of weak and strong polarity items in assertions.” In M. Harvey & L. Santelmann (eds.), Proceedings of SALT IV. Ithaca: Dept. of Modern Language and Linguistics, Cornell University, 195–219.
Krifka, M. 1995. “The semantics and pragmatics of polarity items.” Linguistic Analysis 25: 209–57.
Kuczaj, S. 1976. “-ing and -ed: a study of the acquisition of certain verb inflections.” ms., University of Minnesota.
Kuroda, S.-Y. 1992. Japanese Syntax and Semantics: Collected Papers. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
Löbner, S. 1987. “Quantification as a major module of natural language semantics.” In J. Groenendijk , d. de Jongh & M. Stokhof (eds.), Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers. Foris: Dordrecht, 53–85.
Löbner, S. 1989. “German schon-erst-noch: an integrated analysis.” Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 167–212.
Labov, W. 1975. What is a Linguistic Fact? Lisse: Peter de Ridder.
Labov, W. 1984. “Intensity.” In Schiffrin (ed.), 43–70.
Ladusaw, W. 1979. “Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas, Austin. Republished in the series Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics. New York & London: Garland, 1980.
Ladusaw, W. 1983. “Logical form and conditions on grammaticality.” Linguistics and Philosophy 6: 373–92.
Ladusaw, W. 1992. “Expressing negation.” In C. Barker & D. Dowty (eds.), Proceedings of the SALT II. Columbus: Linguistics Department, Ohio State University, 237–59.
Ladusaw, W. 1996. “Negation and polarity items.” In S. Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Oxford and Malden: Blackwell Publishers, 321–41.
Lahiri, U. 1998. “Focus and negative polarity in Hindi.” Natural Language Semantics 6: 57–123.
Laka, I. 1990. “Negation in syntax: on the nature of functional categories and projections.” Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson . 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, G. 1972. “Hedges: a study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts.” In P. Perenteau , J. Levi & G. Phares (eds.), CLS 8. Chicago: CLS, 183–228.
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, R. 1969. “A syntactic argument for negative transportation.” In R. I. Binnick , A. Davison , G. M. Green & J. L. Morgan (eds.), CLS 5. Chicago: CLS, 140–147.
Lakoff, R. 1970. “Some reasons why there can't be any some-any rule.” Language 45: 608–15.
Lakoff, R. 1973. “The logic of politeness; or, minding your p's and q's.” In C. Colum et al. (eds.), CLS 9, 149–62.
Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisities. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. 1988. “A usage-based model.” In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.), Topics in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 127–61.
Langacker, R. W. 1990. “Subjectification.” Cognitive Linguistics 1: 5–38.
Langacker, R. W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. II: Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. 1997. “Generics and habituals.” In Angeliki Athanasiadou & René Dirven (eds.), On Conditionals Again, Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 143. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 191–222.
Langacker, R. W. 2000. “A dynamic usage-based model.” In Barlow & Kemmer (eds.), 1–64.
Langacker, R. W. 2002. “One any.” In Korean Linguistics Today and Tomorrow: Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Korean Linguisitcs. Seoul: Association for Korean Linguistics, 282–300.
Langendoen, D. T. 1970. “The ‘can't seem to’ construction.” Linguistic Inquiry 1: 25–35.
Larrivée, P. 1996. “A semantic definition of negative polarity items with evidence from French and English.” Unpublished ms., Université of Laval.
Lee, C. 1996. “Negative polarity items in English and Korean.” Language Sciences 18: 505–23.
Lee, Y. & L. R. Horn . 1994. “Any as Indefinite plus even.” Unpublished ms., Yale University.
Leech, G. 1980. Explorations in Semantics and Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Leech, G. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Lees, R. B. 1960. “Review of Bolinger, 1957, Interrogative Structures in American English.” Word 16: 119–25.
LeGrand, J. E. 1975. “Or and any: the semantics and syntax of two logical operators,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.
Leuschner, Torsten , 1996. “ Ever and universal quantifiers of time: observations from some Germanic languages.” Language Sciences 18. 1–2: 469–84.
Levinson, S. C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, S. C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lindholm, J. M. 1969. “Negative raising and sentence pronominalization.” In R. I. Binnick , A. Davison , G. M. Green & J. L. Morgan (eds.), CLS 5, 148–58.
Linebarger, M. 1980. “The grammar of negative polarity.” Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Linebarger, M. 1987. “Negative polarity and grammatical representation.” Linguistics and Philosophy 10: 325–87.
Linebarger, M. 1991. “Negative polarity as linguistic evidence.” In L. M. Dobrin , L. Nichols & R. M. Rodriguez (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Negation. 27, 2. Chicago: CLS, 165–88.
Lyons, J. 1982. “Deixis and subjectivity: loquor, ergo sum?” In R. J. Jarvella & W. Klein (eds.), Speech, Place and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics. New York: Wiley, 101–24.
Möhren, F. 1980. Le renforcement affectif de la négation par l'expression d'une valeur minimale en ancien français. ‘Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie,’ 175. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
MacWhinney, B. 1995. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mahajan, A. 1990. “LF-conditions on negative polarity licensing.” Lingua 80: 330–48.
Mandler, J. M. 1992. “How to build a baby: II conceptual primitives.” Psychological Review 99: 587–604.
Margerie, H. 2007. “From downgrading to (over) intensifying: a pragmatic study in English and French.” In I. Kescskes & L. R. Horn (eds.), Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive and Intercultural Aspects. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin, 287–312.
Margerie, H. 2008. “A historical and collexeme analysis of the development of the compromiser fairly.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 9,2: 288–314.
Matsumoto, Y. 1995. “The conversational condition on horn scales.” Linguistics and Philosophy 18: 21–60.
May, R. 1985. Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mazodier, C. 1998. “‘I must have read it in some article’: instabilité qualitative de some + discontinu singulier.” Cahiers de Recherche en Grammaire Anglais, 111–26.
McGloin, N. H. 1972. “Some Aspects of Negation in Japanese.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.
Meillet, A. 1948. Linguistique historique et linguistique générale. Paris: La Société Linguistique de Paris.
Michaelis, L. A. & K. Lambecht . 1996. “The exclamative sentence type in English.” In A. E. Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 375–89.
Michaelis, L. A. 1992. “Aspect and the semantics-pragmatics interface: the case of already.” Lingua 87: 321–39.
Michaelis, L. A. 1993. “‘Continuity’ within three scalar models: the polysemy of adverbial still.” Journal of Semantics 10: 193–237.
Milsark, G. 1977. “Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English.” Linguistic Analysis 3: 1–29.
Mittwoch, A. 1977. “Negative sentences with until.” In CLS 13. Chicago: CLS, 410–17.
Mittwoch, A. 1988. “Aspects of english aspect: on the interaction of perfect, progressive and durational phrases.” Linguistics and Philosophy 11: 203–54.
Moeschler, J. 1997. “La négation comme expression procedurale.” In Forget (eds.), 231–49.
Morris, C. W. [1938]1955. “Foundations of the theory of signs.” In O. Neurath , R. Carnap & C. W. Morris (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol. I.
Morris, C. W. [1946]1998. “The scope and import of semiotic.” In A. Kasher (ed.), Pragmatics: Critical Concepts, Vol I. London and New York: Routledge, 7–14.
Moxey, L. M. & A. J. Sanford . 1993. Communicating Quantities: A Psychological Perspective. Hove & Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Newmeyer, F. 2003. “Grammar is grammar and usage is usage.” Language 79.4: 682–707.
Palacios Martinez, I. M. 1999. “Negative polarity idioms in Modern English.” ICAME Journal, No. 23, 65–115.
Palmer, F. R. 1990. Modality and the English Modals. London and New York: Longman.
Palmer, F. R. 1994. “Psychological studies of quantifiers.” Journal of Semantics 11.3: 153–70.
Palmer, F. R. 1995. “Negation and the modals of possibility and necessity.” In J. Bybee & S. Fleischman (eds.), Modality in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 453–71.
Paradis, C. 1997. Degree Modifiers of Adjectives in Spoken British English. Lund Studies in English 92. Lund: Lund University Press.
Paradis, C. 2001. “Adjectives and boundedness.” Cognitive Linguistics 12.1: 47–65.
Partee, B. H. , A. G. ter Meulen & R. Wall . 1990. Mathematical Methods in Linguistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
Pinker, S. 1989. Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
Pollard, C. & I. A. Sag . 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press/Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Portner, P. 2009. Modality. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Pott, A. F. 1859. Etymologishce Forschungen auf dem Gebiete der Ino-Germanischen Sprachen, Vol. I. Lemgo/Detmold: Meyer.
Powell, M. J. 1992. “Folk theories of meaning and principles of conventionality: encoding literal attitude via stance adverb.” In A. Lehrer & E. F. Kittay (eds.), Frames, Fields and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 333–54.
Progovac, L. 1992. “Negative polarity: a semantico-syntactic approach.” Lingua 86: 271–99.
Progovac, L. 1994. Negative and Positive Polarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Quine, W. V. O. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Quirk, R. , S. Greenbaum , G. Leech & J. Svartik . 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Raghibdoust, S. 1994. “The semantic-pragmatic nature of the persian polarity items.” Unpublished ms., University of Ottawa.
Roberts, C. 2004. “Context in dynamic interpretation.” In Hom & Ward (eds.), 197–220.
Rooy, R. van. 2003. “Negative polarity items in questions: strength as relevance.” Journal of Semantics 20: 239–73.
Rullmann, H. 1996. “Two types of negative polarity items.” In NELS 26, University of Massachusetts, Amherst: GLSA, 335–50.
Rullmann, H. 2002. “A note on the history of either.” In M. Andronis , E. Debenport , A. Pycha & K. Yoshimura (eds.), Proceeedings from the Panels of the CLS 38, 2. Chicago: CLS.
Rullmann, H. 2003. “Additive particles and polarity.” Journal of Semantics 20: 329–401.
Sánchez Valencia, Víctor . 1991. “Studies on natural logic and categorial grammar.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Sánchez Valencia, V. , T. van der Wouden & F. Zwarts . 1993. “Polarity and the flow of time.” In Boer, de Jong & Landeweerd (eds.), 209–18.
Sadock, J. 1981. “Almost.” In Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 257–71.
Sapir, E. 1944. “Grading: a study in semantics.” Philosophy of Science 11: 93–116. Reprinted in D. G. Mandelbaum (ed.), Edward Sapir: Selected Writings in Language, Culture, and Personality. Berkeley, Los Angeles/London: University of California Press, 1985, 122–49.
Schiffrin, D. (ed.) 1984. Meaning, Form and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications (GURT '84). Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Schmerling, S. 1971. “A note on negative polarity.” Papers in Linguistics 4: 200–6.
Schwenter, S. 1999a. The Pragmatics of Conditional Marking: Implicature, Scalarity, and Exclusivity. New York/London: Garland Press.
Schwenter, S. 1999b. “Two types of scalar particles: evidence from Spanish.” In J. Gutiérrez-Rexach & F. Martínez-Gil (eds.), Advances in Hispanic Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 546–61.
Smith, S. 1975. Meaning and Negation. The Hague: Mouton.
Spencer, N. J. 1973. “Differences between linguists and nonlinguists in intuitions of grammaticality-acceptability.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2: 83–98.
Sperber, D. & D. Wilson . [1986]1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
Spitzbardt, H. 1963. “Overstatement and understatement in British and American English.” Philologica Pragensia 6:45 277–86.
Strawson, P. F. [1970]1985. “Meaning and truth.” 1969 Inaugural Lecture, Oxford University. Reprinted in A. P. Martinich (ed.), The Philosophy of Language. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 101–12.
Suppes, P. 1974. “The semantics of children's language.” American Psychologist 29: 103–14.
Sweetser, E. & B. Dancygier . 2005. Mental Spaces in Grammar: Conditional Constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sweetser, E. 1988. “Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching.” In S. Axmaker , A. Jaisser & H. Singmaster (eds.), BLS 14, University of California, 389–405.
Sweetser, E. 1990. From Etymology To Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Szabolsci, A. 2002. “Hungarian disjunctions and positive polarity.” In I. Kenesei & P. Siptar (eds.), Approaches to Hungarian 8. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 217–41.
Szabolsci, A. 2004. “Positive polarity – negative polarity.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 409–52.
Szabolsci, A. and B. Haddican . 2004. “Conjunction meets negation: a study in cross-linguistic variation.” Journal of Semantics 21: 219–49.
Talmy, L. 1985. “Force dynamics in language and thought.” In W. Eilfort , P. Kroeber & K. Peterson (eds.), CLS: Paracession on causatives and Agentivity, 21. Chicago: CLS, 293–337.
Tomasello, M. 1999. The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tomasello, M. 2003. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tovena, L. & J. Jayez . 1999. “Any: from scalarity to arbitrariness.” In F. Corblin , C. Dobrovie-Sorin & J. M. Marandin (eds.), Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics, Vol. II. The Hague: Theseus, 39–57.
Tovena, L. , V. Deprez & J. Jayez . 2004. “Polarity sensitive items.” In F. Corblin & H. de Swart (eds.), Handbook of French Semantics. CSLI Lecture Notes 17. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 403–27.
Tovena, L. 1998. The Fine Structure of Polarity Items. New York: Garland.
Traugott, E. C. & E. König . 1991. “The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited.” In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 189–218.
Traugott, E. C. & J. Waterhouse . 1969. “Already and yet: a suppletive set of aspect markers?” Journal of Semantics 5: 287–304.
Traugott, E. C. & R. B. Dasher . 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, E. C. 1988. “Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization.” In S. Axmaker , A. Jaisser & H. Singmaster (eds.), BLS 14. Berkeley: University of California 406–16.
Traugott, E. C. 1989. “On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectification in semantic change.” Language 65.1: 31–55.
Uribe-Etxebarria, M. 1994. “Interface licensing conditions on negative polarity items: a theory of polarity and tense interactions.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Vallduvì, E. 1994. “Polarity items, n-words, and minimizers in Catalan and Spanish.” Probus 6: 263–94
van der Auwera, J. & V. Plungian . 1998. “Modality's semantic map.” Linguistic Typology 2: 79–124.
van der Auwera, J. 1993. “Already and still: beyond duality.” Linguistics and Philosophy 16: 613–53.
van der Auwera, J. 2001. “On the typology of negative modals.” In Hoesksema et al. (eds.), 23–48.
van der Wal, S. 1996. Negative Polarity Items and Negation: Tandem Acquisition. Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics 17. Groningen: Center for Language and Cognition, Groningon.
van der Wouden, T . & F. Zwarts . 1993. “A semantic analysis of negative concord.” In L. L. Lahiri & A. Z Wyner (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics Theory III. Ithaca, 202–19.
van der Wouden, T. 1996a. “Three modal verbs.” Paper presented at the Colloquium, The Germanic Verb, Dublin.
van der Wouden, T. 1996b. “Negative polarity auxiliaries.” Paper presented at the PIONIER conference Perspectives on Negation, Groningen.
van der Wouden, T. 1997. Negative Contexts: Collocation, Polarity and Multiple Negation. London/ New York: Routledge.
Vasishth, S. 1998a. “Monotonicity constraints on negative polarity in Hindi.” Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 51: 147–66.
Vendler, Z. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Verhagen, A. 2005. Constructions of Intersubjectivity; Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
von Bergen, A. & K. von Bergen . 1993. Negative Polarität im Englischen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
von Wright, G. H. 1951. An Essay in Modal Logic. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Wagenaar, K. 1930. Etude sur la négation en Ancien Espagnol jusqu'au XVe siècle. Groningen/The Hague: J. B. Wolters Uitgevers-Maatschappij.
Warfel, S. L. 1972. “Some, reference, and description.” In Mid-America Linguistics Conference Papers. Oklahoma City: Oklahoma State University, 41–9.
Wierzbicka, A. 1980. Lingua Mentalis: The Semantics of Natural Language. Sydney: Academic Press.
Yoshimura, A. 1994. “A cognitive constraint on negative polarity phenomena.” In S. Gohl , A. Dolbey & C. Johnson (eds.), BLS 20. Berkeley: University of California, 599–610.
Zanuttini, R. & P. Portner . 2003. “Exclamative clauses: at the syntax-semantics interface.” Language 79.1: 39–81.
Zanuttini, R. 1991. “Syntactic properties of sentential negation: a comparative study of Romance languages.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Zepter, A. 2003. “How to be universal when you are existential: negative polarity items in the comparative: entailment along a scale.” Journal of Semantics 20: 193–237.
Zwarts, F. 1996. “A hierarchy of negative expressions.” In H. Wansing (ed.), Negation: A Notion in Focus. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, 169–94.
Zwarts, F. 1998. “Three types of polarity.” In F. Hamm & E. Hinrichs (eds.), Plural Quantification. Foris: Dordrect, 177–238.