The Impact of the UK Human Rights Act on Private Law


The Impact of the UK Human Rights Act on Private Law

The Human Rights Act 1998 has had a profound effect in numerous private law decisions and has been the subject of extensive academic debate, in particular on the issue of the extent to which it has horizontal effect and its application in disputes between individuals. With contributions from a variety of academics and practitioners, this volume covers and contributes to the academic debate on horizontal effect and considers how theory matches up with case law; the limits of the Act for private law; and its impact on key areas including privacy, defamation, negligence, nuisance, property, commercial law and employment. Together, the book provides a practical critique of the areas discussed, which will be of academic interest to theorists and of practical benefit to lawyers and judges who wish to understand how the academic debates can be brought to bear in particular cases.


 Reviews:

'The chief glory of [the book] lies in its 12 substantive chapters on specific aspects of private law … David Hoffman gives himself three modest pages at the end to reflect on the book's contents, expressing the hope as he says 'that the discussion' in it 'can assist' in the effective reception of the HRA into private law … He should be proud of what he has achieved here: a superb partnership between academics and practitioners, a volume very well presented by Cambridge - and an important contribution to legal understanding of the HRA.' Conor Gearty, Public Law

Reference Type: notes

A. W. B.SimpsonHuman Rights and the End of Empire: Britain and the Genesis of the European ConventionOxford University Press2004
D.HoffmanJ.RoweHuman Rights in the UKLondonPearson2009
G.PhillipsonThe Human Rights Act, “Horizontal Effect” and the Common Law: a Bang or a Whimper’Modern Law Review621999
G.PhillipsonClarity Postponed: Horizontal Effect after H.FenwickG.PhillipsonR.MastermanJudicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights ActCambridge University Press2007143

Reference Type: notes

K.EwingThe Human Rights Act and Parliamentary DemocracyModern Law Review62 1999
M. Hunt1998
G.PhillipsonThe Human Rights Act, “Horizontal Effect” and the Common Law: a Bang or a Whimper?Modern Law Review621999
B.MarkesenisPrivacy, Freedom of Expression and the Horizontal Effect of the Human Rights Bill: Lessons from GermanyLaw Quarterly Review1151999
R.Singh1998
J.BeatsonC. F.ForsythI.HareConstitutional Reform in the United Kingdom: Practice and PrinciplesOxfordHart199862
G.PhillipsonClarity Postponed: Horizontal Effect after H.FenwickR.MastermanG.PhillipsonJudicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights ActCambridge University Press2007143
D.BeyleveldS.PattinsonHorizontal Applicability and Horizontal EffectLaw Quarterly Review1182002
I.LeighHorizontal Rights, the Human Rights Act and Privacy: Lessons from the Commonwealth?International and Comparative Law Quarterly481999
T.Raphael2000
2003
W. N.HohfeldSome Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial ReasoningYale Law Journal231913
J. W.HarrisHuman Rights and Mythical BeastsLaw Quarterly Review1202004
M.TushnetThe Issue of State Action/Horizontal Effect in Comparative Constitutional LawInternational Journal of Constitutional Law12003
S.GardbaumWhere the (State) Action IsInternational Journal of Constitutional Law42006
G.TaylorThe Horizontal Effect of Human Rights Provisions: the German Model and its Applicability to Common-Law JurisdictionsKing's College Law Journal132002
Wade2000
J.MorganPrivacy, Confidence and Horizontal Effect: “Hello” TroubleCambridge Law Journal622003
2004
R.ClaytonH.TomlinsonThe Law of Human RightsOxfordClarendon Press2000234

Reference Type: notes

A.Williams2011
M. AronsonThe Province of Administrative LawOxford1997
P. Craig2002
C. Donnelly2005
S. PalmerPublic Functions and Private Services: A Gap in Human Rights ProtectionInternational Journal of Constitutional Law62008
A. Williams2008
2004
D. Oliver2000
2003
J. Landau2007
H. FenwickG. PhillipsonMedia Freedom under the Human Rights ActOxford University Press2006
H. Quane2006
H. Davis2005
M. Elliott“Public” and “Private”: defining the Scope of the Human Rights ActCambridge Law Journal662007485
1975
2006
2010
2006
C.DonnellyDelegation of Governmental Power to Private Parties: A Comparative PerspectiveOxford University Press2007
R. Buxton2009
S. GardbaumWhere the (State) Action IsInternational Journal of Constitutional Law42006760
2010
G. PhillipsonH. FenwickG. PhillipsonR. MastermanJudicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights ActCambridge University Press2007
M. HuntThe “Horizontal Effect” of the Human Rights ActPublic Law1998
J.MorganQuestioning the “True Effect” of the Human Rights ActLegal Studies222002

Reference Type: notes

2004
G.PhillipsonClarity Postponed: Horizontal Effect after ’H.FenwickR.MastermanG. PhillipsonJudicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights ActCambridgeUniversity Press2007
2008
T.HickmanPublic Law after the Human Rights ActOxfordHart2010
F.Schauer1995
I.LeighR.MastermanMaking Rights Real: the Human Rights Act in its First DecadeOxfordHart2008256
D. MeadRights, Relationships and Retrospectivity: the Impact of Convention Rights on Pre-existing Private Relationships following and Public Law2005
P. SalesA Comparison of the Principle of Legality and Section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998Law Quarterly Review1252009
A.YoungParliamentary Sovereignty and the Human Rights ActOxfordHart2009
A.KavanaghConstitutional Review under the Human Rights ActCambridge University Press2009
M.ElliottParliamentary Sovereignty and the New Constitutional Order: Legislative Freedom, Political Reality and ConventionLegal Studies222002
F. Klug2007
ElliottH. FenwickHuman Rights and Civil LibertiesOxford: Routledge-Cavendish2007
2009
2006
M. Amos2007
F. Davis2010
T. CampbellT. CampbellK. EwingA. TomkinsSceptical Essays on Human RightsOxford University Press2002
D. NicolStatutory Interpretation and Human Rights after Public Law2004
A. Kavanagh2005
G. MarshallThe Lynchpin of Parliamentary Intention: Lost, Stolen or StrainedPublic Law2003
R. EkinsA Critique of Radical Approaches to Rights-consistent Statutory InterpretationEuropean Human Rights Law Review62003
J.BellG.EngleCross on Statutory InterpretationLondonButterworths1995
R. Ekins2005
F. BennionStatutory Interpretation: A CodeLondonButterworths2002
D. GreenbergThe Nature of Legislative Intention and its Implications for Legislative DraftingStatute Law Review272006
T.EndicottJ.GetzlerE.PeelProperties of Law: Essays in Honour of Jim HarrisOxford University Press2006
H.FenwickR.MastermanG.PhillipsonJudicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights ActCambridge University Press2007
K. Sawyer2007
2006
J.RazIntention in InterpretationRGeorgeThe Autonomy of LawOxfordClarendon Press1996
J. RazThe Authority of LawOxford University Press1983
G.De BurcaGiving Effect to European Community DirectivesModern Law Review551992
2004
2008
P.SalesB.HooperProportionality and the Form of LawLaw Quarterly Review1192003
J. van Zyl Smit2007

Reference Type: notes

J.Lewis2007
2009
N. MorehamPrivacy in Public PlacesCambridge Law Journal652006
B. Rudolf2006
N. Hatziz2005
G.BusuttilReportage: A not Entirely Neutral ReportEntertainment Law Review20200949
J.Wright2009
2002

Reference Type: notes

K.ZieglerHuman Rights and Private Law: Privacy as AutonomyOxfordHart2007
P.CaneThe Anatomy of Tort LawOxfordHart1997
A.RobertsonH. W.TangThe Goals of Private LawOxfordHart2009239
2007
1998
2005
N. McBride2004

Reference Type: notes

J.Morgan2003
G.PhillipsonA. T.KenyonM.RichardsonNew Dimensions in Privacy LawCambridge University Press2006
G. PhillipsonA. Williams2011
W. WadeHorizons of HorizontalityLaw Quarterly Review1162000217
J. Morgan2002
N.MorehamPrivacy and Horizontality: Relegating the Common LawLaw Quarterly Review1232007
T. Bennett2009
2005
2003
2010
2006
H.FenwickG.PhillipsonR.MastermanJudicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights ActCambridge University Press2007
M. HuntThe “Horizontal Effect” of the Human Rights ActPublic Law1998
G. PhillipsonThe Human Rights Act, “Horizontal Effect” and the Common Law: a Bang or a Whimper?Modern Law Review621999
2005
A. YoungK. ZieglerHuman Rights and Private Law: Privacy as AutonomyOxfordHart2007
G. PhillipsonTransforming Breach of Confidence? Towards a Common Law Right to Privacy under the Human Rights ActModern Law Review662003726
Basil S. MarkesinisOur Patchy Law of Privacy – Time to Do Something About ItModern Law Review531990
1992
1993
S.RasaiahCurrent Legislation, Privacy and the Media in the UKCommunications Law31998
2003
G.PhillipsonH.FenwickBreach of Confidence as a Privacy Remedy in the Human Rights Act EraModern Law Review632000
H.FenwickCambridge Law Journal551996
R. MulheronA Potential Framework For Privacy? A Reply To Modern Law Review692006679
I. HareVertically Challenged: Private Parties, Privacy and the Human Rights ActEuropean Human Rights Law Review2001526
D. FeldmanSecrecy, Dignity or Autonomy? Views of Privacy as a Civil LibertyCurrent Legal Problems471994

Reference Type: notes

S. Praduroux2008
2004
D. Anderson1999
1986
1990
1987
1989
1994
1998
2003
2005
2007
T. AllenProperty and the Human Rights Act 1998OxfordHart2005
D. FairgrieveState Liability in Tort: A Comparative StudyOxford University Press2003
C. MillerEnvironmental Rights in a Welfare State? A Comment on DeMerieuxOxford Journal of Legal Studies232003111
K. Oliphant (ed.)The Law of TortLondonLexisNexis Butterworths2007
1986
2002
2004
1996
D. J.HarrisHarris, O’Boyle and Warbrick's Law of the European Convention on Human RightsOxford University Press2009
2002
2001
2004
2000
1997
R. BagshawPrivate Nuisance and the Defence of the RealmLaw Quarterly Review1202004
S. Tofaris2009
2008
J. WrightTort Law and Human RightsOxfordHart2001
A. MullisK. OliphantTortsBasingstokePalgrave Macmillan2011
1981
S. Kneebone1986
R.StevensTorts and RightsOxford University Press2007102
2000
S. BrightLiability for the Bad Behaviour of OthersOxford Journal of Legal Studies212001
P. H. WinfieldPrivacyLaw Quarterly Review471931
1937

Reference Type: notes

2009
2003
2009

Reference Type: notes

1999
R. Wintemute2004
D. Pannick1983
R. WintemuteRecognising New Kinds of Sex Discrimination: Transsexualism, Sexual Orientation and Dress CodesModern Law Review601997
2000
L. McColganReligion and (In)Equality in the WorkplaceIndustrial Law Journal38200916
2006
1992
2007
A. BakerProportionality and Employment Discrimination in the UKIndustrial Law Journal372008
1982
1997
H. OliverSexual Orientation Discrimination: Perceptions, Definitions and Genuine Occupational RequirementsIndustrial Law Journal332004

Reference Type: notes

R. ClaytonH. TomlinsonThe Law of Human RightsOxford University Press2009
H. McGregorMcGregor on DamagesLondonSweet & Maxwell2009
A. R. Mowbray1997
1997
R. Clayton2005
2000
P. BoatengJ. Straw1997
2002
J. BeatsonS. GroszT. HickmanR. SinghS. Palmer2008
D. FeldmanD. FeldmanEnglish Public LawOxford University Press2009
2008
D. J. HarrisM. O’BoyleE. P. BatesC. M. BuckleyHarris, O’Boyle & Warbrick: Law of the European Convention on Human RightsOxford University Press2009
D. FairgrieveD. FairgrieveM. AndenasJ. BellTort Liability of Public Authorities in Comparative PerspectiveLondonBIICL2002
2006
Lord WoolfM. AndenasD. FairgrieveJudicial Review in International PerspectiveThe Hague: Kluwer Law2000
M. Amos1999
K. StarmerEuropean Human Rights Law: The Human Rights Act 1998 and the European Convention on Human RightsLondonLAG1999
D. SheltonRemedies in International Human Rights LawOxford University Press2005
1999
Lord LesterHuman Rights Law and PracticeLondonLexisNexis2009
P. BirksThree Kinds of Objection to Discretionary RemedialismUniversity of Western Australia Law Review292000
P. De JerseyC. E. F. RickettJustifying Private Law RemediesOxfordHart2008
2010
R. CarnwathECHR Remedies from a Common Law PerspectiveInternational and Comparative Law Quarterly492000
C. Harlow“Public” and “Private” Law: Definition Without DistinctionModern Law Review431980
C. HarlowR. RawlingsLaw and AdministrationCambridge University Press2009
Lord Lester2009
J. MurphyStreet on TortsOxford University Press2007
T. WeirA Casebook on TortLondonSweet & Maxwell2004
T. WeirAn Introduction to Tort LawOxford University Press2006
A. M. TettenbornD. WilbyThe Law of DamagesLondonLexisNexis2010
A. V. DiceyIntroduction to the Study of the Law of the ConstitutionLondonMacmillan1960
C. HarlowCompensation and Government TortsLondonSweet & Maxwell1982
C. HarlowState Liability: Tort Law and BeyondOxford University Press2004
G. SamuelGovernmental Liability in Tort and the Public and Private Law DivisionLegal Studies81988277
Lord WoolfJ. JowellA. Le SueurDe Smith's Judicial ReviewLondonSweet & Maxwell2007
J. Stapleton1988
P. CaneThe Anatomy of Tort LawOxfordHart1997
P. Cane in Tort LawOxford Journal of Legal Studies202000533
2000
R. F. V. HeustonR. A. BuckleySalmond and Heuston on the Law of TortsLondonSweet & Maxwell1996
M. C. ElliottBeatson, Matthews and Elliott's Administrative LawOxford University Press2005
J. N. E. VaruhasA Tort-based Approach to Damages under the Human Rights Act 1998Modern Law Review722009
2007
R. StevensTorts and RightsOxford University Press2007
J. EdelmanGain-based Damages: Contract, Tort, Equity and Intellectual PropertyOxfordHart2002
A. BurrowsRemedies for Torts and Breach of ContactOxford University Press2004
P. GewirtzRemedies and ResistanceYale Law Journal921983
2008
2001
P. BirksPhilosophical Foundations of Tort LawOxfordClarendon Press1995
1979
2004
1983
1999
1999
J. N. E. Varuhas2010
P. CaneJ. Stapleton (eds.)The Law of Obligations: Essays in Celebration of John FlemingOxfordClarendon Press1998
1996
2010
D. OliverEuropean Human Rights Law Review2000343
C. Harlow2004
P. MilmoW. V. H. RogersGatley on Libel and SlanderLondonSweet & Maxwell2008
Judicial Studies BoardGuidelines for the Assessment of General Damages in Personal Injury CasesOxford University Press2008

Reference Type: notes

S. GrayK. Gray2003
R. BuxtonThe Human Rights Act and Private LawLaw Quarterly Review1162000
G. PhillipsonH. FenwickR. MastermanG. PhillipsonJudicial Reasoning under the UK HRACambridge University Press2007
T. AllenProperty Law and the Human Rights Act 1998OxfordHart2005
1986
2008
2007
2006
2009
A. MowbrayThe Development of Positive Obligations under the ECHR by the European Court of Human RightsOxfordHart2004
2005
1986
2002
2007
2009
J. HowellThe Human Rights Act 1998: Land, Private Citizens, and the Common LawLaw Quarterly Review1232007
2008
A. GoymourProprietary Claims and Human Rights – A “Reservoir of Entitlement”Cambridge Law Journal652006696
2003
D. Feldman (ed.)English Public LawOxford University Press2009
2000
2010
2009
A. ClohertyD. FoxHeresies and Human RightsCambridge Law Journal642005558
2008
1979
T. AllenE. CookeModern Studies in Property Law: Vol. 2Oxford: Hart2003
B. McFarlaneN. HopkinsS. NieldLand Law: Text, Cases and MaterialsOxford University Press2009
D. HarrisM. O’BoyleE. BatesC. BuckleyLaw of the European Convention on Human RightsOxford University Press2009
2010
1983
1986
2010
1993
1986
2010
2008
2001
D. FoxP. BirksA. PrettoBreach of TrustOxford University Press2002
R. NolanUnderstanding the Limits of Equitable PropertyJournal of Equity1200623
S. NieldE. CookeModern Studies in Property Law: Vol. 3Oxford: Hart2005
1997
1995
2010
2008
L. Tee1998
1995
M. DixonE. CookeModern Studies in Property Law: Vol. 4Hart2007

Reference Type: notes

D. KinleyHuman Rights and CorporationsFarnhamAshgate2009
J. HarrisonThe Human Rights Impact of the World Trade OrganisationOxfordHart2007
C. HardingU. KohlN. SalmonHuman Rights in the Market PlaceFarnhamAshgate2008
S. BottomleyD. KinleyCommercial Law and Human RightsAldershotDartmouth2002
P. DuffyR. CranstonMaking Commercial LawOxfordClarendon1997
R. ClaytonH. TomlinsonThe Law of Human RightsOxfordClarendon Press2000
A. DenningThe Due Process of LawOxford University Press1980
E. McKendrickR. GoodeGoode on Commercial LawLondonLexisNexis Butterworths2009
C. Ambrose2000
C. AmbroseK. MaxwellA. ParryLondon Maritime ArbitrationLondonInforma Law2009
1962
1980
Rt. Hon. Lord Justice BinghamReasons and Reasons for Reasons: Differences Between a Court Judgment and an Arbitration AwardArbitration International41988
J. UlphT. Allen2004
2004
2007
F. D. RoseMarine Insurance: Law and PracticeLondonInforma Law2004
1925
F. D. RoseW. R. KennedyKennedy & Rose on the Law of SalvageLondonSweet & Maxwell2000
M. G. BridgeBenjamin's Sale of GoodsLondonSweet & Maxwell2010
2008
F. D. Rose2007
2006
2010

Reference Type: notes

P. BirksUnjust EnrichmentOxford University Press2003
W. CornishRestitution, Past Present and FutureOxfordHart1998
G. JonesGoff & Jones: The Law of RestitutionLondonSweet & Maxwell2006
A. BurrowsThe Law of RestitutionOxford University Press2010
1996
2002
2010
P. BirksEssays in RestitutionMelbourneLaw Book Co.1990
2003
1997
1995
1986
D. HoffmanJ. RoweHuman Rights in the UKLondonPearson2009
C. Mitchell2010
J. FinnisThe Fairy Tale's MoralLaw Quarterly Review1151999170
1996
A. S. BurrowsJ. NeyersM. McInnesS. PitelUnderstanding Unjust EnrichmentOxfordHart200414
C. Mitchell2007)2008
J. EdelmanGain-Based DamagesOxfordHart2002

Reference Type: notes

J. BanksS. TannerHome-Ownership and Saving in the UKHousing Finance452000
I. HussainMacroeconomic Determinants of Personal BankruptciesManagerial Finance282002
C. HarpumS. BridgeM. DixonMegarry and Wade: The Law of Real PropertyLondonSweet & Maxwell2008
L. SealyD. MilmanAnnotated Guide to the Insolvency Legislation 2011LondonSweet & Maxwell2011

Reference Type: notes

P. DaviesM. FreedlandLabour Legislation and Public Policy: A Contemporary HistoryOxfordClarendon1993
1988
1979
G. MorrisThe Act and the Public/Private Divide in Employment LawIndustrial Law Journal271998293
M. FordSurveillance and Privacy at WorkLondonInstitute of Employment Rights1998
K. EwingThe Human Rights Act and Labour LawIndustrial Law Journal271998
H. CollinsFinding the Right Direction for the “Industrial Jury”Industrial Law Journal292000288
L. VickersUnfair Dismissal and Human RightsIndustrial Law Journal33200452
1996

Reference Type: notes

A. ZuckermanZuckerman on Civil Procedure: Principles of PracticeLondonThomson2006
J. JacobCivil Justice in the Age of Human RightsFarnhamAshgate2007
I. ScottConvention Compatible Interpretation of Procedural LegislationCivil Justice Quarterly212002
1997
1997
1992
1993
1986
1969
2005
1995
1985
1985
S. SheppardThe Selected Writings of Sir Edward Coke, Vol. II: Liberty FundIndianapolisLiberty Fund2003
1988
2007
J. JacobThe Fabric of English Civil JusticeNew York: Stevens1987
M. DamaskaThe Faces of Justice and State AuthorityNew HavenYale University Press1986
J. JolowiczAdversarial and Inquisitorial Models of Civil ProcedureInternational & Comparative Law Quarterly522003
H. WoolfAccess to Justice: Interim Report to the Lord Chancellor on the Civil Justice System in England and WalesLondon: HMSO1995

Reference Type: notes

C. Warbrick1998
N. Moreham2008