The Political Morality of Liberal Democracy


The Political Morality of Liberal Democracy

In this important new work in political and constitutional theory, Michael Perry elaborates and defends an account of the political morality of liberal democracy: the moral convictions and commitments that in a liberal democracy should govern decisions about what laws to enact and what policies to pursue. The fundamental questions addressed in this book concern (1) the grounding, (2) the content, (3) the implications for one or another moral controversy, and (4) the judicial enforcement of the political morality of liberal democracy. The particular issues discussed include whether government may ban pre-viability abortion, whether government may refuse to extend the benefit of law to same-sex couples, and what role religion should play in the politics and law of a liberal democracy.


 Reviews:

“Michael Perry is clearly one of our best and most prolific legal scholars, and The Political Morality of Liberal Democracy is one of his finest books. Not the least strength of this volume is the way Perry artfully performs what he commends to us. The thoughtful, challenging arguments Perry offers teach us in the doing how Perry would have us conduct our political arguments with one another.”
--Milner S. Ball, Harmon W. Caldwell Chair Emeritus in Constitutional Law, University of Georgia


"This book is the capstone of Professor Perry's long and fruitful engagement with the difficult question of how religion should inform lawmaking in a liberal democracy. As a political liberal who belongs to a culturally conservative religion, I have found Professor Perry's work both intellectually enlightening and personally meaningful. The Political Morality of Liberal Democracy is an excellent work that forces one out of reflexive responses to religion in politics."
--Frederick Mark Gedicks, Guy Anderson Chair & Professor of Law, Brigham Young University


The Political Morality of Liberal Democracy is a focused, original, and important contribution to the discussion of religion and liberal democracy. Perry focuses on two of the most controversial cases in current debate: abortion and same-sex unions; and he offers a theoretical account of liberal democracy that reframes the terms in which those debates should be conducted. The argument of the book is clear and compelling.
----Robin W. Lovin, Cary M. Maguire University Professor of Ethics, Southern Methodist University


“This is vintage Michael Perry. He addresses a big, fundamental, and timely issue: What are the moral convictions that should govern legislation and policy in a liberal democracy? He discusses the topic with verve, clarity, wide scope, and astounding learning; and both formulates general rules and analyzes specific cases. If you have been unsettled by attacks over the past several decades on our form of government, The Political Morality of Liberal Democracy is the book to read to quiet your doubts.”
--Nicholas Wolterstorff, Noah Porter Professor Emeritus of Philosophical Theology, Yale University


Michael Perry has written a powerful defense of liberal democracy and human rights—a defense grounded on religious faith. He finds secular defenses wanting. Both for religious supporters of liberal democracy and human rights and for secular supporters, Perry’s book is must reading. But the provocative chapters on such topics as religious freedom, abortion, same-sex unions, and the role of courts provide additional reasons to read this book.”
--Lawrence A. Alexander, Warren Distinguished Professor of Law, University of San Diego


“Michael Perry is widely recognized for his major contributions to our understanding of law, morality, and religion, and especially of the grounding, content, implications, and judicial enforcement of constitutionally entrenched human rights. The Political Morality of Liberal Democracy should be of interest to every conscientious citizen.”
--Richard George Wright, Lawrence A. Jegen Professor of Law, Indiana University School of Law -- Indianapolis


"The literature on religion and public discourse and policy is now very considerable, and overwhelming American. Most of it has been written by philosophers and theologians. Michael Perry, however, makes a distinctive contribution in writing as an expert in constitutional law. This is a clearly written, logically organized, accessible, original book on an important and topical issue."
--Nigel Biggar, Regius Professor of Moral and Pastoral Theology, University of Oxford


"Focuses on abortion and same-sex unions in a study of the political role of religion in liberal democracies..."
--The Chronicle of Higher Education


The Political Morality of Liberal Democracy is an important and timely book, with much to offer those working in political philosophy and constitutional law. It brings together in a unified theory the many ideas of one of our most distinguished commentators on the proper role of religion in law and political life.
--Notre Dame Philosophical Review


"....extremely interesting and provocative....offers a thoughtful analysis that productively balances normative theorizing and concrete considerations and, in so doing, produces a very engaging and useful contribution to the existing scholarship."
--Shaun P. Young, York University, Philosophy in Review


"....wide-ranging and forceful...." -
William A. Galston, Brookings Institution, Commonweal


"...this new book from Michael J. Perry surely contributes to a rich and essential discussion on the interaction between religion and the law.... original, enlightening, challenging and persuasive.... Perry shows brilliantly in this book what many authors fail to point out: a very inclusive and hopeful reminder that proves wrong those who forget that (a) religion can be and often is a source of adherence to liberal democracies and (b) that all citizens, regardless of their (non)religious practices and beliefs, share much more in terms of political morality than what sporadically divides them." -
Benjamin Prud'homme, Quebec Journal of International Law


“A Nation of Christians Is Not a Christian Nation,” NEW YORK TIMES, Oct. 7, 2007
“Abortion, the Public Morals, and the Police Power: The Ethical Function of Substantive Due Process,” 23 UCLA L. REV. 689 (1976)
“Atheist Defends Belief in God,” TABLET [London], Mar. 24, 2007, at 33
“Bishop Brings Reason to Issue of Gay Benefits,” NATIONAL CATHOLIC RPTR., Nov. 7, 2003, at 24
“Commemorating Twenty-Five Years of Judge Richard A. Posner,” 74 U. CHICAGO L. REV. 1641–931 (2007)
“Correspondence: Jews and Christians, Hate and Forgiveness,” FIRST THINGS, May 2003, at 2–9
“is in hopeless disarray.…” Rosenberger v. Rector and Visitors of University of Virginia, 515 U.S. 819, 861 (1995)
“Nuncio Backs ‘Right’ to Gay Unions,” TABLET [London], May 15, 2004, at 30
“One Hundred Years of Judicial Review: The Thayer Centennial Symposium,” 88 NORTHWESTERN U. L. REV. 1–468 (1993)
“Other Faiths Are Deficient, Pope Says,” TABLET [London], Feb. 5, 2000
“Other Faiths Are Deficient, Pope Says,” TABLET [London], Feb. 5, 2000, at 157
“Religious Freedom Is Universal,” TABLET [London], Mar. 15, 2006
“Report Says Democracies Enable Despots,” NEW YORK TIMES, Jan. 31, 2008
“Sign of the Times,” AMERICA, Nov. 15, 2004, at 4, 5
“The Act of Settlement Debate,” TABLET [London], Aug. 11, 2007
“The Challenge for Islam,” TABLET [London], July 8, 2006, at 2
“The Foundations and Frontiers of Religious Liberty: A 25th Anniversary Celebration of the 1981 U.N. Declaration on Religious Tolerance,” 21 EMORY INTERNATIONAL L. REV. 1–275 (2007)
(see William J. Brennan, Jr., “The Worldwide Influence of the United States Constitution as a Charter of Human Rights,” 15 NOVA L. REV. [1991])
Adam Liptak, “Caution in Court for Gay Rights Groups,” NEW YORK TIMES, Nov. 12, 2004
Aidan O'Neill, “Roman Catholicism and the Temptation of Shari'a,” 15 COMMON KNOWLEDGE 269, 297 et seq. (2009)
Aidan O'Neill, “Roman Catholicism and the Temptation of Shari'a,” 15 COMMON KNOWLEDGE 269, 297 et seq. (2009)
Akhil Reed Amar, “Foreword: The Document and the Doctrine,” 114 HARVARD L. REV. 26, 119 (2000)
Alan Cowell, “Human Rights Report Assails U.S.,” NEW YORK TIMES, May 29, 2008
Alan Wolfe, “Mobilizing the Religious Left,” NEW YORK TIMES BOOK REV., Oct. 21, 2007
Alison Leigh Cowan, “Gay Couples Say Civil Unions Aren't Enough,” NEW YORK TIMES, Mar. 17, 2008
Allan C. Hutchinson, “Supreme Court Inc: The Business of Democracy and Rights,” in Gavin W. Anderson, ed., Rights & Democracy: Essays in UK–Canadian Constitutionalism 29 (1999)
Allan C. Hutchinson, “Waiting for CORAF (or the Beatification of the Charter),” 41 U. TORONTO L. J. 332, 358 (1991)
Amartya Sen, “Elements of a Theory of Human Rights,” 32 PHILOSOPHY & PUBLIC AFFAIRS 315, 322 (2004)
Amartya Sen, “Elements of a Theory of Human Rights,” 32 PHILOSOPY & PUBLIC AFFAIRS 35, 317 (2004)
Andrew Koppelman, “Are the Boy Scouts Being as Bad as Racists? Judging the Scouts' Antigay Policy,” 18 PUBLIC AFFAIRS QUARTERLY 363, 372 (2004)
Andrew Koppelman, “Civil Conflict and Same-Sex Civil Unions,” RESPONSIVE COMMUNITY, Spring/Summer 2004, at 20
Andrew Koppelman, “Secular Purpose,” 88 VIRGINIA L. REV. 87, 108 (2002)
Andrew Koppelman, “Talking to the Boss: On Robert Bennett and the Counter-Majoritarian Difficulty,” 95 NORTHWESTERN U. L. REV. 955, 956–57 (2001)
Andrew Koppelman, “Three Arguments for Gay Rights,” 95 MICHIGAN L. REV. 1636, 1666 (1997)
Andrew Koppelman, “You Can't Hurry Love: Why Antidiscrimination Protections for Gay People Should Have Religious Exemptions,” 72 BROOKLYN L. REV. 125, 145 (2006)
Andrew O'Hagan, “Word Wizard,” NEW YORK REV. BOOKS, Apr. 27, 2006, at 12, 12
Andrew Oldenquist, “Retribution and the Death Penalty,” 20 U. DAYTON L. REV. 335, 340–43 (2004)
Andrew Sullivan, “Three's a Crowd,” NEW REPUBLIC, June 17, 1996, at 10, 12
Anthony Kenny, “Life Stories: When an Individual Life Begins – and the Ethics of Ending It,” TIMES LIT. SUPP., Mar. 25, 2005, at 3
Anthony Kenny, “The Soul Issue,” TIMES LIT. SUPP., Mar. 7, 2003, at 12
Anthony T. Kronman, “Living in the Law,” 54 U. CHICAGO L. REV. 835, 847–48 (1987)
Asher Maoz, “Can Judaism Serve as a Source of Human Rights?,” 64 HEIDELBERG J. INTL' L. 677 (2004)
Associated Press, “Study: Newborn Euthanasia Often Unreported,” NEW YORK TIMES, Mar. 10, 2005
Aviam Soifer, “Text-Mess: There Is No Textual Basis for Application of the Takings Clause to the States,” 28 U. HAWAII L. REV. 373 (2006)
Ben Schuman, “Gods & Gays: Analyzing the Same-Sex Marriage Debate from a Religious Perspective,” 96 GEORGETOWN L. J. 2103, 2121–24 (2008)
Benjamin D. Bleiberg, “Unveiling the Real Issue: Evaluating the European Court of Human Rights' Decision to Enforce the Turkish Headscarf Ban in Leyla Sahin v. Turkey,” 91 CORNELL L. REV. 129 (2005)
Benjamin M. Eidelson, “A Penumbra Overlooked: The Free Exercise Clause and Lawrence v. Texas,” 30 HARVARD J. L. & GENDER 203 (2007)
Bernard Williams, “Republican and Galilean,” NEW YORK REV., Nov. 8, 1990
Brian Davies, “Creationism and All That,” TABLET [London], May 11, 2002, at 16:
Brian Lavery, “Ireland: Premier Backs Rights for Gay Couples,” NEW YORK TIMES, Nov. 16, 2004
Byron L. Sherwin, “Jews and the World to Come,” FIRST THINGS, June/July 2006, at 13
Cécile Laborde, “Secular Philosophy and Muslim Headscarves in Schools,” 13 J. POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY 305, 308 (2005)
Caroline Frasier, “Suffering Children and the Christian Science Church,” ATLANTIC MONTHLY, April 1995, at 105
Chad Flanders, “The Possibility of a Secular First Amendment,” 26 QUEEN'S L. REV. 257, 288–303 (2008)
Charles L. Black, Jr., “‘One Nation Indivisible’: Unnamed Human Rights in the States,” 65 ST. JOHN'S L. REV. 17, 55 (1991)
Charles Larmore, “Beyond Religion and Enlightenment,” 30 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 799, 799–802 (1993)
Charles Larmore, “The Moral Basis of Political Liberalism,” 96 J. PHILOSOPHY 599, 624–25 (1999)
Charles Taliaferro, “Why We Need Immortality,” 6 MODERN THEOLOGY 367 (1990)
Cheryl Saunders, “Comment: Religion and the State,” 21 CARDOZO L. REV. 1295, 1295–96 (2000)
Christina Murray, “A Constitutional Beginning: Making South Africa's Final Constitution,” 23 U. ARKANSAS AT LITTLE ROCK L. REV. 809 (2001)
Citing J. M. Finnis, “On the Critical Legal Studies Movement,” 30 AMERICAN J. JURISPRUDENCE 21, 23–25 (1985)
Clifford Longley, “‘The Church Hasn't Yet Made a Mature Appraisal of What Democracy Demands’,” TABLET [London], May 7, 2005, at 11
Clifford Longley, “Establishment – It's Got to Go,” TABLET [London], May 11, 2002
Compare Richard Taylor, “Ancient Wisdom and Modern Folly,” 13 MIDWEST STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY 54, 57, 58 (1988)
Czeslaw Milosz, “The Religious Imagination at 2000,” NEW PERSPECTIVES QUARTERLY, Fall 1997
Dan Savage, “Anti-Gay, Anti-Family,” NEW YORK TIMES, Nov. 12, 2008
Dan Savage, “Anti-Gay, Anti-Family,” NEW YORK TIMES, Nov. 12, 2008
David Brooks, “The Power of Marriage,” NEW YORK TIMES, Nov. 22, 2003
David DeGrazia, “Identity, Killing, and the Boundaries of Our Existence,” 31 PHILOSOPHY & PUBLIC AFFAIRS 414, 428–30 (2003)
David Lodge, “Goodbye to All That,” NEW YORK REV., May 27, 2004, at 39, 41
David M. Gallagher, “Thomas Aquinas on Self-Love as the Basis for Love of Others,” 8 ACTA PHILOSOPHICA 23 (1999)
David O. Brink, “A Puzzle about the Rational Authority of Morality,” 6 PHILOSOPHICAL PERSPECTIVES 1, 22 (1992)
David O. Brink, “Self-Love and Altruism,” 14 SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY & POLICY 122 [1997]
David S. Buckel, “Government Affixes a Label of Inferiority on Same-Sex Couples When It Imposes Civil Unions & Denies Access to Marriage,” 16 STANFORD L. & POL'Y REV. 73 (2005)
Dennis Prager, “Can We Be Good Without God?,” 9 ULTIMATE ISSUES 3, 4 (1993)
Derek H. Davis, “Is Atheism a Religion? Recent Judicial Perspectives on the Constitutional Meaning of ‘Religion’,” 47 J. CHURCH & STATE 707 (2005)
Derek H. Davis, “The Evolution of Religious Freedom as a Universal Human Right: Examining the Role of the 1981 United Nations Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief,” 2002 BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY L. REV. 217
Dietrich Bonhoeffer, A Testament to Freedom 482, 486 (Geoffrey B. Kelly & F. Burton Nelson, eds.; rev. ed.; HarperSanFrancisco 1995)
Douglas Laycock, “Equal Access and Moments of Silence: The Equal Status of Religious Speech by Private Speakers,” 81 NORTHWESTERN U. L. REV. 1, 7 (1986)
Douglas Laycock, “Freedom of Speech That Is Both Religious and Political,” 29 U. CALIFORNIA, DAVIS L. REV. 793, 812–13 (1996)
Douglas Laycock, “Regulatory Exemptions of Religious Behavior and the Original Understanding of the Establishment Clause,” 81 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1793, 1838–39 (2006)
Douglas Laycock, “Religious Liberty as Liberty,” 7 J. CONTEMPORARY LEGAL ISSUES 313, 317 (1996)
Douglas Laycock, “Theology Scholarships, the Pledge of Allegiance, and Religious Liberty: Avoiding the Extremes, Missing the Liberty,” 118 HARVARD L. REV. 155, 224–27 (2004)
Edward Collins Vacek, SJ, “Divine-Command, Natural-Law, and Mutual-Love Ethics,” 57 THEOLOGICAL STUDIES 633 (1996)
Edward Collins Vacek, SJ, “The Meaning of Marriage: Of Two Minds,” COMMONWEAL, Oct. 24, 2003
Edward J. Eberle, “Roger Williams' Gift: Religious Freedom in America,” ROGER WILLIAMS UNIVERSITY L. REV. 425, 441–42, 443 (1999)
Edward Rothstein, “Annals of Homosexuality: From Greek to Grim to Gay,” NEW YORK TIMES, Dec. 13, 2003
Elizabeth Rubin, “The Jihadi Who Kept Asking Why,” NEW YORK TIMES MAGAZINE, Mar. 7, 2004
Evelyn Nieves, “Judges Ban Pledge of Allegiance from Schools, Citing ‘Under God’,” NEW YORK TIMES, June 27, 2002
Francis Campbell, “No Future in the Ghetto,” TABLET [London], Feb. 1, 2008
Frank I. Michelman, “Socioeconomic Rights in Constitutional Law: Explaining America Away,” 6 INTERNATIONAL J. CONSTITUTIONAL L. 663 (2008)
Frederick Mark Gedicks & Roger Hendrix, “Uncivil Religion: Judeo-Christianity and the Ten Commandments,” 110 WEST VIRGINIA L. REV. 275 (2007)
G. F. Whyte, “The Frontiers of Religious Liberty: A Commonwealth Celebration of the 25th Anniversary of the U.N. Declaration on Religious Tolerance – Ireland,” 21 EMORY INTERNATIONAL L. REV. 43 (2007)
G. W. G. Leane, “Enacting Bills of Rights: Canada and the Curious Case of New Zealand's ‘Thin’ Democracy,” 26 HUMAN RIGHTS QUARTERLY 152 (2004)
Garry Wills, “The Bishops vs. the Bible,” NEW YORK TIMES, June 27, 2004
Gene Outka, “The Ethics of Human Stem Cell Research,” in Brent Waters & Ronald Cole-Turner, eds., God and the Embryo: Religious Voices on Stem Cell and Cloning 29 (2003)
Geoffrey Nunberg, “We the People? (In Order to Form a More Perfect Gay Union),” NEW YORK TIMES, Feb. 22, 2004
Giles Foden, “Rehearsal for Genocide,” NEW YORK TIMES BOOK REV., Apr. 20, 2003
Glenn Tinder, “Can We Be Good without God: The Political Meaning of Christianity,” ATLANTIC, December 1989
Gregory A. Kalscheur, SJ, “Moral Limits on Morals Legislation: Lessons for U.S. Constitutional Law from the Declaration on Religious Freedom,” 16 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INTERDISCIPLINARY L. J. 1 (2006)
H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr., “Moral Knowledge: Some Reflections on Moral Controversies, Incompatible Moral Epistemologies, and the Culture Wars,” 10 CHRISTIAN BIOETHICS 79, 84 (2004)
Helmut Gollwitzer et al., Dying We Live: The Final Messages and Records of the Resistance (New York: Pantheon Books, Inc. 1956)
Henry B. Veatch, “Modern Ethics, Teleology, and Love of Self,” 75 MONIST 52, 60 (1992)
Henry J. Steiner, “Human Rights: The Deepening Footprint,” 20 HARVARD HUMAN RIGHTS J. 7, 9 (2007)
Howard Fineman, “One Nation, Under…Who?,” NEWSWEEK, July 8, 2002
Ian Kershaw, “Afterthought: Some Reflections on Genocide, Religion, and Modernity,” in Omer Bartov & Phyllis Mack, eds., In God's Name: Genocide and Religion in the Twentieth Century 377 (2001)
J. M. Balkin, “The Constitution of Status,” 106 YALE L. J. 2313, 2352–53 (1997)
James Allan, “A Defense of the Status Quo,” in Tom Campbell et al., eds., Protecting Human Rights: Instruments and Institutions 175 (2003)
James Allan, “Rights, Paternalism, Constitutions and Judges,” in Grant Huscroft & Paul Rishworth, eds., Litigating Rights: Perspectives from Domestic and International Law 29 (2002)
James Allan, “The Effect of a Statutory Bill of Rights Where Parliament Is Sovereign: The Lesson from New Zealand,” in Tom Campbell et al., eds., Sceptical Essays on Human Rights 375 (2001)
James B. Thayer, “The Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law,” 7 HARVARD L. REV. 129, 130 (1893)
James B. Thayer, “The Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law,” 7 HARVARD L. REV. 129, 130 (1893)
James Bernard Murphy, “Practical Reason and Moral Psychology in Aristotle and Kant,” 18 SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY & POLICY 257, 273–76 (2001)
James Boyd White, “Talking about Religion in the Language of Law: Impossible but Necessary,” 81 MARQUETTE L. REV. 177, 197–99 (1998)
James Bradley Thayer, “Constitutionality of Legislation: The Precise Question for a Court,” THE NATION, Apr. 10, 1884, at 315)
Jean Porter, “Is the Embryo a Person? Arguing with the Catholic Traditions,” COMMONWEAL, Feb. 8, 2002, at 8
Jeff McMahan, “Paradoxes of Abortion and Prenatal Injury,” 116 ETHICS 625, 627 (2006)
Jeffrey Goldsworthy, “Raz on Constitutional Interpretation,” 22 LEGAL PHILOSOPHY 167, 193 (2003)
Jeffrey L. Sheler, “Faith in America,” U.S. NEWS, May 6, 2002, at 40, 42
Jeffrey Stout, “A House Founded on the Sea: Is Democracy a Dictatorship of Relativism?,” 13 COMMON KNOWLEDGE 385, 387 (2008)
Jeffrie G. Murphy, “Law Like Love,” 55 SYRACUSE L. REV. 15, 21 (2004)
Jennifer 8. Lee, “Congressman Says Bush Is Open to States' Bolstering Gay Rights,” NEW YORK TIMES, Feb. 9, 2004
Jeremy Rabkin, “Private Preferences: Why Affirmative Action Won't Disappear Anytime Soon,” AMERICAN SPECTATOR, November 1998, 62, 63
Jeremy Waldron, “A Right-Based Critique of Constitutional Rights,” 13 OXFORD J. LEGAL STUDIES 18, 50–51 (1993)
Jeremy Waldron, “The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review,” 115 YALE L. J. 1346 (2006
Jeremy Waldron, “The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review,” 115 YALE L. J. 1346, 1366 (2006)
Jim Wurst, “Archbishop Tutu Examines Link Between Religion and Politics,” U.N. WIRE, Mar. 18, 2004
Johannes Morsink, “World War Two and the Universal Declaration,” 15 HUMAN RIGHTS Q. 357, 363 (1993)
John A. Coleman, SJ, “Religious Liberty: Unfinished Items from the Council,” AMERICA, Nov. 28, 2005, at 9
John Corvino, “Homosexuality and the PIB Argument,” 115 ETHICS 501, 509 (2005)
John Dominic Crossan, “Case Against Manifesto,” 5 LAW, TEXT, CULTURE 129, 144 (2000)
John Haldane & Patrick Lee, “Aquinas on Ensoulment, Abortion and the Value of Life,” 78 PHILOSOPHY 255 (2003)
John Haldane & Patrick Lee, “Rational Souls and the Beginning of Life,” 78 PHILOSOPHY 532 (2003)
John Haldane, “The Greatest of These Is Love, as an Atheist Reminds Us,” TABLET \LONDON], Dec. 9, 2000
John Hart Ely, “The Wages of Crying Wolf: A Comment on Roe v. Wade,” 82 YALE L. J. 920 (1973)
John Hart Ely, “The Wages of Crying Wolf: A Comment on Roe v. Wade,” 82 YALE L. J. 920, 923 (1973)
John Langan, “Observations on Abortion and Politics,” AMERICA, Oct. 25, 2004
John Langan, SJ, “Observations on Abortion and Politics,” AMERICA, Oct. 25, 2004
John Leslie, “Is It All Quite Simple? The Physicist's Search for a Theory of Everything,” TIMES LIT. SUPP., Jan. 29, 1993
John Perry, “John Locke's America: The Character of Liberal Democracy and Jeffrey Stout's Debate with the Christian Traditionalists,” 27 J. SOCIETY OF CHRISTIAN ETHICS 227 (2007)
John Schwartz, “When Torment Is Baby's Destiny, Euthanasia Is Defended,” NEW YORK TIMES, Mar. 10, 2005
John Witte, Jr., “Primer on the Rights and Wrongs of Proselytism,” 31 CUMBERLAND L. REV. 619, 627 (2001)
John Witte, Jr., “The Serpentine Wall of Separation,” 101 MICHIGAN L. REV. 1869, 1899–900 (2003)
Jonathan Rauch, “Family's Value: Gay Marriage Is Good for Kids,” NEW REPUBLIC, May 30, 2005, at 15
Joseph Boyle, “Positivism, Natural Law, and Disestablishment,” 20 VALPARAISO L. REV. 55, 59 (1985)
Joseph F. Donceel, SJ, “A Liberal Catholic's View,” in Robert Hall, ed., Abortion in a Changing World 39 (1970)
Joseph F. Donceel, SJ, “Immediate Animation and Delayed Homonization,” 31 THEOLOGICAL STUDIES 76 (1970)
Julia Annas, “Virtue and Eudaimonism,” 15 SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY & POLICY 37, 53 n. 35 (1998)
Keith E. Whittington, “The New Originalism,” 2 GEORGETOWN J. L. & PUBLIC POLICY 599, 610 (2004)
Kenji Yoshino, “Marriage Partners,” NEW YORK TIMES MAGAZINE, June 1, 2008
Kenneth Roth, “Despots Masquerading as Democrats,” in human rights watch, WORLD REPORT 1, 7 (2008)
Kent Greenawalt, “Common Sense about Original and Subsequent Understandings of the Religion Clauses,” 8 J. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 479, 511 (2005)
Kent Greenawalt, “History as Ideology: Philip Hamburger's Separation of Church and State,” 93 CALIFORNIA L. REV. 367, 390–91 (2005)
Kent Greenawalt, “How Law Can be Determinate,” 31 UCLA L. REV. 1, 29 (1990)
Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public Health, 957 A. 2d 407 (Connecticut 2008)
Kim A. McDonald, “Anthropologists Debate Whether War Is Inevitable among Humans,” CHRONICLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION, Nov. 22, 1999
Kurt T. Lash, “Originalism, Popular Sovereignty, and Stare Decisis,” 93 VIRGINIA L. REV. 1437, 1481 (2007)
Larry A. Alexander, “Constitutionalism,” in Martin P. Golding & William A. Edmundson, eds., The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory 248, 255 (2004)
Larry D. Kramer, “Foreword: We the Court,” 115 HARVARD L. REV. 4 (2001)
Laurence H. Tribe, “Will the Abortion Fight Ever End?; A Nation Held Hostage,” NEW YORK TIMES, July 2, 1990
Lawrence B. Solum, “On the Indeterminacy Crisis: Critiquing Critical Dogma,” 54 U. CHICAGO L. REV. 462 (1987)
Lawrie Breen, “A Chinese Puzzle,” TABLET [London], Mar. 5, 2005
Leonard W. Levy, “Editorial Note,” in Leonard W. Levy, ed., Judicial Review and the Supreme Court: Selected Essays 84 (1967)
Leslie Griffin, “Commentary on Dignitatis humanae (Declaration on Religious Freedom), in Kenneth R. Himes, ed., MODERN CATHOLIC SOCIAL TEACHING: COMMENTARIES AND INTERPRETATIONS 244 (2004)
Leslie Griffin, “Commentary on Dignitatis humanae (Declaration on Religious Freedom), in Kenneth R. Himes, ed., MODERN CATHOLIC SOCIAL TEACHING: COMMENTARIES AND INTERPRETATIONS 244 (2004)
Linda C. McClain, “God's Created Order, Gender Complementarity, and the Federal Marriage Amendment,” 20 BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY J. PUBLIC LAW 313 (2006)
Lord Scarman, “Britain and the Protection of Human Rights,” 15 CAMBRIAN L. REV. 5, 10 (1984)
Louis B. Sohn, “The New International Law: Protection of the Rights of Individuals Rather Than States,” 32 AMERICAN U. L. REV. 1 (1982)
Mac Darrow & Philip Alston, “Bills of Rights in Comparative Perspective,” in Philip Alston, ed., Promoting Human Rights Through Bills of Rights: Comparative Perspectives 465, 493 (1999)
Mark Lilla, “The Politics of God,” NEW YORK TIMES, Aug. 9, 2007
Marriage Cases, 183 P.3d 384, 444 (California 2008)
Martha C. Nussbaum, “Platonic Love and Colorado Law: The Relevance of Ancient Greek Norms to Modern Sexual Controversies,” 80 VIRGINIA L. REV. 1515, 1601 (1994)
Martin Kavka & Randi Rashkover, “A Jewish Modified Divine Command Theory,” 32 J. RELIGIOUS ETHICS 387 (2004)
Mary B. Mahowald, “Conception vs. Fertilization,” COMMONWEAL, Sept. 9, 2005, at 40
Meir Y. Soloveichik, “The Virtue of Hate,” FIRST THINGS, February 2003, at 41
Micah Watson, Book Review, 50 J. CHURCH & STATE 158, 159 (2008)
Michael J. Perry, “Morality and Normativity,” 13 LEGAL THEORY 211 (2007)
Michael J. Perry, “Morality and Normativity,” 13 LEGAL THEORY 211, 236–48 (2008)
Michael J. Perry, “The Disproportionate Impact Theory of Racial Discrimination,” 125 U. PENNSYLVANIA L. REV. 540 (1977)
Michael J. Wreen, “The Standing Is Slippery,” 79 PHILOSOPHY 553, 571–72 (2004)
Michael Lerner, “Jesus the Jew,” TIKKUN, May/June 2004, at 33
Michael S. Gazzaniga, “The Thoughtful Distinction Between Embryo and Human,” THE CHRONICLE REVIEW, Apr. 8, 2005
Michael W. McConnell, “Accommodation of Religion: An Update and Response to the Critics,” 60 GEORGE WASHINGTON L. REV. 685, 690 (1992)
Michael W. McConnell, “Active Liberty: A Progressive Alternative to Textualism and Originalism?,” 119 HARVARD L. REV. 2387, 2417 (2006)
Michael W. McConnell, “Establishment and Disestablishment at the Founding, Part I: Establishment of Religion,” 44 WILLIAM & MARY L. REV. 2105, 2182 (2003)
Michael W. McConnell, “Establishment and Disestablishment at the Founding, Part I: The Establishment of Religion,” 44 WM. & MARY L. REV. 2105 (2003)
Michael W. McConnell, “The Problem of Singling Out Religion,” 50 DEPAUL L. REV. 1, 44 (2000)
Michael Walsh, “U-turn on Human Rights,” TABLET [London], Dec. 14, 2002
Mirko Bagaric & James Allan, “The Vacuous Concept of Dignity,” 5 J. HUMAN RIGHTS 257, 261–63 (2006)
Mitchell N. Berman, “Constitutional Decision Rules,” 90 VIRGINIA L. REV. 1, 102–04 (2004)
Mitchell N. Berman, “Originalism Is Bunk,” 84 NYU L. REV. 1, 33–36 (2009)
Nathan Stoltzfus, “Dissent in Nazi Germany,” ATLANTIC, September 1992, at 87, 94
Neil MacCormick, “Reconstruction after Deconstruction: A Response to CLS,” 10 OXFORD J. LEGAL STUDIES 539, 548 (1990)
Nicholas D. Kristof, “Lovers Under the Skin,” NEW YORK TIMES, Dec. 3, 2003
Nicholas D. Kristof, “The American Witness,” NEW YORK TIMES, Mar. 2, 2005
Os Guinness, “On Faith,” WILSON QUARTERLY, Spring 2005
Patrick Lee & Robert George, “The Nature and Basis of Human Dignity,” 21 RATIO JURIS 173 (2008)
Paul Cruickshank, “Covered Faces, Open Rebellion,” NEW YORK TIMES, Oct. 21, 2006
Paul Davies, “The Holy Grail of Physics,” NEW YORK TIMES BOOK REV., Mar. 7, 1993
Paul Finkelman, “Civil Rights in Historical Context: In Defense of Brown,” 118 HARVARD L. REV. 973 (2005)
Paul Finkelman, “Civil Rights in Historical Context: In Defense of Brown,” 118 HARVARD L. REV. 973 (2005)
Paul Finkelman, “The Ten Commandments on the Courthouse Lawn and Elsewhere,” 73 FORDHAM L. REV. 1477, 1480–98 (2005)
Peter Berger, “On the Obsolescence of the Concept of Honor,” in Stanley Hauerwas & Alasdair MacIntyre, eds., Revisions: Changing Perspectives in Moral Philosophy 172, 176 (1983)
Peter Berkowitz, “Illiberal Liberalism,” FIRST THINGS, April 2007, at 50, 54
Peter Slevin, “33 Pastors Flout Tax Law With Political Sermons,” WASHINGTON POST, Sept. 29, 2008
Peter Steinfels, “The Search for an Alternative,” COMMONWEAL, NOV. 20, 1981
Recep Senturk, “‘I Am Therefore I Have Rights’: Human Rights and Islam between Universalistic and Communalistic Perspectives,” 2 MUSLIM WORLD J. HUMAN RIGHTS (2005)
Richard A. McCormick, SJ, “The Gospel of Life,” AMERICA, Apr. 29, 1995, at 12, 13
Richard A. Posner, “Enlightened Despot,” NEW REPUBLIC, Apr. 23, 2007, at 53, 54
Richard A. Posner, “Enlightened Despot,” NEW REPUBLIC, Apr. 23, 2007, at 53, 55
Richard A. Posner, “Review of Jeremy Waldron, Law and Disagreement,” 100 COLUMBIA L. REV. 582, 592 (2000)
Richard A. Posner, “The Problematics of Moral and Political Theory,” 111 HARVARD L. REV. 1637, 1687 (1998)
Richard B. Bilder, “Human Rights and U.S. Foreign Policy: Short-Term Prospects,” 14 VIRGINIA J. INTERNATIONAL L. 597, 608 (1974)
Richard John Neuhaus, “Nasty and Nice in Politics and Religion in the Public Sqare: A Survey of Religion and Public Life,” FIRST THINGS, March 2004
Richard S. Kay, “Original Intention and Public Meaning in Constitutional Interpretation,” 103 NORTHWESTERN L. REV. 703 (2009)
Robbie Brown, “Antipathy Toward Obama Seen as Helping Arkansas Limit Adoption,” NEW YORK TIMES, Nov. 8, 2008
Robbie Brown, “Antipathy Toward Obama Seen as Helping Arkansas Limit Adoption,” NEW YORK TIMES, Nov. 9, 2008
Robert C. Post & Reva B. Siegel, “Protecting the Constitution from the People: Juricentric Restrictions on Section Five Power,” 78 INDIANA L. J. 1 (2003)
Robert F. Nagel, “Playing Defense in Colorado,” FIRST THINGS, May 1998, at 34, 35
Robert G. Natelson, “The Founders' Hermeneutic: The Real Original Understanding of Original Intent,” 68 OHIO STATE L. J. 1239, 1305 (2007)
Robert P. George & Patrick Lee, “Acorns and Embryos,” THE NEW ATLANTIS, Fall 2004/Winter 2004
Robert P. George, “Law and Moral Purpose,” FIRST THINGS, January 2008, at 22
Robert P. George, “Law and Moral Purpose,” FIRST THINGS, January 2008, at 25–28
Robert Pasnau, “Souls and the Beginning of Life (A Reply to Haldane & Lee),” 78 PHILOSOPHY 521 (2003)
Roderick M. Hills, Jr., “You Say You Want a Revolution? The Case Against the Transformation of Culture Through Moral Equality Laws,” 95 MICHIGAN L. REV. 1588, 1610–11 (1997)
Roger W. Smith, “American Self-Interest and the Response to Genocide,” CHRONICLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION, July 30, 2004
Rosemary Radford Ruether, “Marriage Between Homosexuals Is Good for Marriage,” NATIONAL CATHOLIC RPTR., Nov. 18, 2005, at 20
Ross A. Slotten, “AIDS in Namibia,” 41 SOC. SCI. MED. 277 (1995)
Samuel Brittan, “Making Common Cause: How Liberals Differ, and What They Ought To Agree On,” TIMES LIT. SUPP., Sept. 20, 1996, at 3, 4
Samuel Moyn, “On the Genealogy of Morals,” THE NATION, Apr. 16, 2007, at 25
Shannon D. Gilreath, “Cruel and Unusual Punishment and the Eighth Amendment as a Mandate for Human Dignity: Another Look at Original Intent,” 25 THOMAS JEFFERSON L. REV. 559, 571–84 (2003)
Sheryl Gay Stolberg, “Shifting Certainties in the Abortion War,” NEW YORK TIMES, Jan. 11, 1998
Stephen A. Siegel, “The Origin of the Compelling State Interest Test and Strict Scrutiny,” 48 AMERICAN J. LEGAL HISTORY 355 (2006)
Stephen J. Pope, “The Magisterium's Arguments against ‘Same-Sex Marriage’: An Ethical Analysis and Critique,” 65 THEOLOGICAL STUDIES 530, 559 (2004)
Stephen L. Carter, “When Victims Happen To Be Black,” 97 YALE L. J. 420, 433–43 (1988)
Stephen Pope, “The Evolutionary Roots of Morality in Theological Perspective,” 33 ZYGON 545, 554 [1998]
Stephen Scott, “Motive and Justification,” 85 J. PHILOSOPHY 479, 499 (1988)
Steven D. Smith, ‘What Does Religion Have to Do with Freedom of Conscience?’ 76 U. COLORADO L. REV. 911 (2005)
Steven D. Smith, “Separation and the ‘Secular’: Reconstructing the Disestablishment Decision,” 67 TEXAS L. REV. 955, 973 [1989])
Steven D. Smith, “What Does Religion Have to Do with Freedom of Conscience?” 76 U. COLORADO L. REV. 911, 921 (2005)
Steven G. Calabresi & Sarah E. Agudo, “Individual Rights Under State Constitutions When the Fourteenth Amendment Was Ratified in 1868: What Rights Are Deeply Rooted in American History and Tradition?,” 87 TEXAS L. REV. 7, 37 (2008)
Steven G. Gey, “‘Under God,’ the Pledge of Allegiance, and Other Constitutional Trivia,” 81 NORTH CAROLINA L. REV. 1865, 1866–69 (2003)
Steven H. Shiffrin, “Liberalism and the Establishment Clause,” 78 CHICAGO-KENT L. REV. 717, 727 (2003)
Steven H. Shiffrin, “The Pluralistic Foundations of the Religion Clauses,” 90 CORNELL L. REV. 9, 72 (2004)
Steven Shiffrin, “Religion and Democracy,” 74 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1631, 1652–56 (1999)
Steven Weinberg, “Without God,” NEW YORK BOOKS REV., Sept. 25, 2008
Symposium, “Religiously Based Morality: Its Proper Place in American Law and Public Policy?” 36 WAKE FOREST L. REV. 217–570 (2001)
Terry Eagleton, “Lunging, Flailing, Mispunching,” LONDON REV. OF BOOKS, Oct. 19, 2006)
Thomas A. Shannon, “Human Embryonic Stem Cell Therapy,” 62 THEOLOGICAL STUDIES 811, 814–21 (2001)
Thomas Buergenthal, “The Evolving International Human Rights System,” 100 AMERICAN J. INT'L L. 783 (2006)
Thomas Nagel, “Progressive but Not Liberal,” NEW YORK REV. OF BOOKS, May 25, 2006
Tim Hames, “‘It would have been more honest to have called it the Dangerous Catholics Act,’” TABLET [London], Aug. 11, 2007
Timothy P. Jackson, “The Theory and Practice of Discomfort: Richard Rorty and Pragmatism,” 51 THOMIST 270, 284–85 (1987)
Tom J. Farer & Felice Gaer, “The UN and Human Rights: At the End of the Beginning,” in Adam Roberts & Benedict Kingsbury, eds., United Nations, Divided World 240 (2d ed. 1993)
USCCB Administrative Committee, “Promote, Protect, Preserve Marriage: Statement on Marriage and Homosexual Unions,” 33 ORIGINS 257, 259 (2003)
USCCB Administrative Committee, “Statement on Marriage and Homosexual Unions,” 33 ORIGINS 257, 259 (2003)
Varnum v. Brien, 763 N.W. 2d 862 (Iowa 2009)
Vesan Kesavan & Michael Stokes Paulsen, “The Interpretive Force of the Constitution's Secret Drafting History,” 91 GEORGETOWN L. J. 1113, 1162 [2002–03])
Vicki C. Jackson, “Constitutional Dialogue and Human Dignity: States and Transnational Constitutional Discourse,” 65 MONTANA L. REV. 15 (2004)
Wallace Mendelson, “The Influence of James B. Thayer upon the Work of Holmes, Brandeis, and Frankfurter,” 31 VANDERBILT L. REV. 71 (1978)
Warren Christopher, “Democracy and Human Rights: Where America Stands,” 4 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE DISPATCH 441, 442 (1993)
William J. Brennan, Jr., “Constitutional Adjudication and the Death Penalty: A View from the Court,” 100 HARVARD L. REV. 313, 324 (1986)
William N. Eskridge, Jr., “America's Statutory ‘Constitution,’” 41 U. CALIFORNIA, DAVIS L. REV. 1 (2007)
William Van Alstyne, “Ten Commandments, Nine Justices, and Five Versions of One Amendment – The First. (‘Now What?’),” 14 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 17 (2005)
William W. Burke-White, “Human Rights and National Security: The Strategic Connection,” 17 HARVARD HUMAN RIGHTS J. 249 (2004)
Yong Huang, “‘Why Be Moral?’ The Cheng Brothers' Neo-Confucian Answer,” 36 J. RELIGIOUS ETHICS 321 [2008].