The Political Morality of Liberal Democracy


The Political Morality of Liberal Democracy

In this important new work in political and constitutional theory, Michael Perry elaborates and defends an account of the political morality of liberal democracy: the moral convictions and commitments that in a liberal democracy should govern decisions about what laws to enact and what policies to pursue. The fundamental questions addressed in this book concern (1) the grounding, (2) the content, (3) the implications for one or another moral controversy, and (4) the judicial enforcement of the political morality of liberal democracy. The particular issues discussed include whether government may ban pre-viability abortion, whether government may refuse to extend the benefit of law to same-sex couples, and what role religion should play in the politics and law of a liberal democracy.


 Reviews:

“Michael Perry is clearly one of our best and most prolific legal scholars, and The Political Morality of Liberal Democracy is one of his finest books. Not the least strength of this volume is the way Perry artfully performs what he commends to us. The thoughtful, challenging arguments Perry offers teach us in the doing how Perry would have us conduct our political arguments with one another.”
--Milner S. Ball, Harmon W. Caldwell Chair Emeritus in Constitutional Law, University of Georgia


"This book is the capstone of Professor Perry's long and fruitful engagement with the difficult question of how religion should inform lawmaking in a liberal democracy. As a political liberal who belongs to a culturally conservative religion, I have found Professor Perry's work both intellectually enlightening and personally meaningful. The Political Morality of Liberal Democracy is an excellent work that forces one out of reflexive responses to religion in politics."
--Frederick Mark Gedicks, Guy Anderson Chair & Professor of Law, Brigham Young University


The Political Morality of Liberal Democracy is a focused, original, and important contribution to the discussion of religion and liberal democracy. Perry focuses on two of the most controversial cases in current debate: abortion and same-sex unions; and he offers a theoretical account of liberal democracy that reframes the terms in which those debates should be conducted. The argument of the book is clear and compelling.
----Robin W. Lovin, Cary M. Maguire University Professor of Ethics, Southern Methodist University


“This is vintage Michael Perry. He addresses a big, fundamental, and timely issue: What are the moral convictions that should govern legislation and policy in a liberal democracy? He discusses the topic with verve, clarity, wide scope, and astounding learning; and both formulates general rules and analyzes specific cases. If you have been unsettled by attacks over the past several decades on our form of government, The Political Morality of Liberal Democracy is the book to read to quiet your doubts.”
--Nicholas Wolterstorff, Noah Porter Professor Emeritus of Philosophical Theology, Yale University


Michael Perry has written a powerful defense of liberal democracy and human rights—a defense grounded on religious faith. He finds secular defenses wanting. Both for religious supporters of liberal democracy and human rights and for secular supporters, Perry’s book is must reading. But the provocative chapters on such topics as religious freedom, abortion, same-sex unions, and the role of courts provide additional reasons to read this book.”
--Lawrence A. Alexander, Warren Distinguished Professor of Law, University of San Diego


“Michael Perry is widely recognized for his major contributions to our understanding of law, morality, and religion, and especially of the grounding, content, implications, and judicial enforcement of constitutionally entrenched human rights. The Political Morality of Liberal Democracy should be of interest to every conscientious citizen.”
--Richard George Wright, Lawrence A. Jegen Professor of Law, Indiana University School of Law -- Indianapolis


"The literature on religion and public discourse and policy is now very considerable, and overwhelming American. Most of it has been written by philosophers and theologians. Michael Perry, however, makes a distinctive contribution in writing as an expert in constitutional law. This is a clearly written, logically organized, accessible, original book on an important and topical issue."
--Nigel Biggar, Regius Professor of Moral and Pastoral Theology, University of Oxford


"Focuses on abortion and same-sex unions in a study of the political role of religion in liberal democracies..."
--The Chronicle of Higher Education


The Political Morality of Liberal Democracy is an important and timely book, with much to offer those working in political philosophy and constitutional law. It brings together in a unified theory the many ideas of one of our most distinguished commentators on the proper role of religion in law and political life.
--Notre Dame Philosophical Review


"....extremely interesting and provocative....offers a thoughtful analysis that productively balances normative theorizing and concrete considerations and, in so doing, produces a very engaging and useful contribution to the existing scholarship."
--Shaun P. Young, York University, Philosophy in Review


"....wide-ranging and forceful...." -
William A. Galston, Brookings Institution, Commonweal


"...this new book from Michael J. Perry surely contributes to a rich and essential discussion on the interaction between religion and the law.... original, enlightening, challenging and persuasive.... Perry shows brilliantly in this book what many authors fail to point out: a very inclusive and hopeful reminder that proves wrong those who forget that (a) religion can be and often is a source of adherence to liberal democracies and (b) that all citizens, regardless of their (non)religious practices and beliefs, share much more in terms of political morality than what sporadically divides them." -
Benjamin Prud'homme, Quebec Journal of International Law


Reference Type: notes

Aidan O'Neill, “Roman Catholicism and the Temptation of Shari'a,” 15 COMMON KNOWLEDGE 269, 297 et seq. (2009)
“Abortion, the Public Morals, and the Police Power: The Ethical Function of Substantive Due Process,” 23 UCLA L. REV. 689 (1976)
Jeffrey L. Sheler, “Faith in America,” U.S. NEWS, May 6, 2002, at 40, 42
Symposium, “Religiously Based Morality: Its Proper Place in American Law and Public Policy?” 36 WAKE FOREST L. REV. 217–570 (2001)
Mark Lilla, “The Politics of God,” NEW YORK TIMES, Aug. 9, 2007
Micah Watson, Book Review, 50 J. CHURCH & STATE 158, 159 (2008)

Reference Type: notes

Kenneth Roth, “Despots Masquerading as Democrats,” in human rights watch, WORLD REPORT 1, 7 (2008)
“Report Says Democracies Enable Despots,” NEW YORK TIMES, Jan. 31, 2008
Andrew Koppelman, “Talking to the Boss: On Robert Bennett and the Counter-Majoritarian Difficulty,” 95 NORTHWESTERN U. L. REV. 955, 956–57 (2001)
Richard A. Posner, “Enlightened Despot,” NEW REPUBLIC, Apr. 23, 2007, at 53, 54
Thomas Nagel, “Progressive but Not Liberal,” NEW YORK REV. OF BOOKS, May 25, 2006
Charles Larmore, “The Moral Basis of Political Liberalism,” 96 J. PHILOSOPHY 599, 624–25 (1999)
Jeffrey Stout, “A House Founded on the Sea: Is Democracy a Dictatorship of Relativism?,” 13 COMMON KNOWLEDGE 385, 387 (2008)
Samuel Brittan, “Making Common Cause: How Liberals Differ, and What They Ought To Agree On,” TIMES LIT. SUPP., Sept. 20, 1996, at 3, 4
Aidan O'Neill, “Roman Catholicism and the Temptation of Shari'a,” 15 COMMON KNOWLEDGE 269, 297 et seq. (2009)
Kim A. McDonald, “Anthropologists Debate Whether War Is Inevitable among Humans,” CHRONICLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION, Nov. 22, 1999
Giles Foden, “Rehearsal for Genocide,” NEW YORK TIMES BOOK REV., Apr. 20, 2003
Ross A. Slotten, “AIDS in Namibia,” 41 SOC. SCI. MED. 277 (1995)
Ian Kershaw, “Afterthought: Some Reflections on Genocide, Religion, and Modernity,” in Omer Bartov & Phyllis Mack, eds., In God's Name: Genocide and Religion in the Twentieth Century 377 (2001)
Roger W. Smith, “American Self-Interest and the Response to Genocide,” CHRONICLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION, July 30, 2004
Os Guinness, “On Faith,” WILSON QUARTERLY, Spring 2005
Louis B. Sohn, “The New International Law: Protection of the Rights of Individuals Rather Than States,” 32 AMERICAN U. L. REV. 1 (1982)
Tom J. Farer & Felice Gaer, “The UN and Human Rights: At the End of the Beginning,” in Adam Roberts & Benedict Kingsbury, eds., United Nations, Divided World 240 (2d ed. 1993)
Alan Cowell, “Human Rights Report Assails U.S.,” NEW YORK TIMES, May 29, 2008
Samuel Moyn, “On the Genealogy of Morals,” THE NATION, Apr. 16, 2007, at 25
Vicki C. Jackson, “Constitutional Dialogue and Human Dignity: States and Transnational Constitutional Discourse,” 65 MONTANA L. REV. 15 (2004)
Mirko Bagaric & James Allan, “The Vacuous Concept of Dignity,” 5 J. HUMAN RIGHTS 257, 261–63 (2006)
Johannes Morsink, “World War Two and the Universal Declaration,” 15 HUMAN RIGHTS Q. 357, 363 (1993)
Amartya Sen, “Elements of a Theory of Human Rights,” 32 PHILOSOPHY & PUBLIC AFFAIRS 315, 322 (2004)
Dietrich Bonhoeffer, A Testament to Freedom 482, 486 (Geoffrey B. Kelly & F. Burton Nelson, eds.; rev. ed.; HarperSanFrancisco 1995)
Nicholas D. Kristof, “The American Witness,” NEW YORK TIMES, Mar. 2, 2005
Henry J. Steiner, “Human Rights: The Deepening Footprint,” 20 HARVARD HUMAN RIGHTS J. 7, 9 (2007)
Thomas Buergenthal, “The Evolving International Human Rights System,” 100 AMERICAN J. INT'L L. 783 (2006)

Reference Type: notes

Recep Senturk, “‘I Am Therefore I Have Rights’: Human Rights and Islam between Universalistic and Communalistic Perspectives,” 2 MUSLIM WORLD J. HUMAN RIGHTS (2005)
Asher Maoz, “Can Judaism Serve as a Source of Human Rights?,” 64 HEIDELBERG J. INTL' L. 677 (2004)
Michael Lerner, “Jesus the Jew,” TIKKUN, May/June 2004, at 33
Brian Davies, “Creationism and All That,” TABLET [London], May 11, 2002, at 16:
Stephen Pope, “The Evolutionary Roots of Morality in Theological Perspective,” 33 ZYGON 545, 554 [1998]
David M. Gallagher, “Thomas Aquinas on Self-Love as the Basis for Love of Others,” 8 ACTA PHILOSOPHICA 23 (1999)
David Lodge, “Goodbye to All That,” NEW YORK REV., May 27, 2004, at 39, 41
Helmut Gollwitzer et al., Dying We Live: The Final Messages and Records of the Resistance (New York: Pantheon Books, Inc. 1956)
Terry Eagleton, “Lunging, Flailing, Mispunching,” LONDON REV. OF BOOKS, Oct. 19, 2006)
Charles Taliaferro, “Why We Need Immortality,” 6 MODERN THEOLOGY 367 (1990)
Byron L. Sherwin, “Jews and the World to Come,” FIRST THINGS, June/July 2006, at 13
Jeffrie G. Murphy, “Law Like Love,” 55 SYRACUSE L. REV. 15, 21 (2004)
Meir Y. Soloveichik, “The Virtue of Hate,” FIRST THINGS, February 2003, at 41
“Correspondence: Jews and Christians, Hate and Forgiveness,” FIRST THINGS, May 2003, at 2–9
Edward Collins Vacek, SJ, “Divine-Command, Natural-Law, and Mutual-Love Ethics,” 57 THEOLOGICAL STUDIES 633 (1996)
Stephen Scott, “Motive and Justification,” 85 J. PHILOSOPHY 479, 499 (1988)
Julia Annas, “Virtue and Eudaimonism,” 15 SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY & POLICY 37, 53 n. 35 (1998)
Compare Richard Taylor, “Ancient Wisdom and Modern Folly,” 13 MIDWEST STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY 54, 57, 58 (1988)
James Bernard Murphy, “Practical Reason and Moral Psychology in Aristotle and Kant,” 18 SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY & POLICY 257, 273–76 (2001)
David O. Brink, “A Puzzle about the Rational Authority of Morality,” 6 PHILOSOPHICAL PERSPECTIVES 1, 22 (1992)
David O. Brink, “Self-Love and Altruism,” 14 SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY & POLICY 122 [1997]
Yong Huang, “‘Why Be Moral?’ The Cheng Brothers' Neo-Confucian Answer,” 36 J. RELIGIOUS ETHICS 321 [2008].
Charles Larmore, “Beyond Religion and Enlightenment,” 30 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 799, 799–802 (1993)
John Dominic Crossan, “Case Against Manifesto,” 5 LAW, TEXT, CULTURE 129, 144 (2000)
Martin Kavka & Randi Rashkover, “A Jewish Modified Divine Command Theory,” 32 J. RELIGIOUS ETHICS 387 (2004)
Nathan Stoltzfus, “Dissent in Nazi Germany,” ATLANTIC, September 1992, at 87, 94
Glenn Tinder, “Can We Be Good without God: The Political Meaning of Christianity,” ATLANTIC, December 1989
John Haldane, “The Greatest of These Is Love, as an Atheist Reminds Us,” TABLET \LONDON], Dec. 9, 2000
John Leslie, “Is It All Quite Simple? The Physicist's Search for a Theory of Everything,” TIMES LIT. SUPP., Jan. 29, 1993
Steven Weinberg, “Without God,” NEW YORK BOOKS REV., Sept. 25, 2008
Paul Davies, “The Holy Grail of Physics,” NEW YORK TIMES BOOK REV., Mar. 7, 1993
Richard A. Posner, “The Problematics of Moral and Political Theory,” 111 HARVARD L. REV. 1637, 1687 (1998)
James Boyd White, “Talking about Religion in the Language of Law: Impossible but Necessary,” 81 MARQUETTE L. REV. 177, 197–99 (1998)
Dennis Prager, “Can We Be Good Without God?,” 9 ULTIMATE ISSUES 3, 4 (1993)
Patrick Lee & Robert George, “The Nature and Basis of Human Dignity,” 21 RATIO JURIS 173 (2008)
Henry B. Veatch, “Modern Ethics, Teleology, and Love of Self,” 75 MONIST 52, 60 (1992)
Bernard Williams, “Republican and Galilean,” NEW YORK REV., Nov. 8, 1990
Jim Wurst, “Archbishop Tutu Examines Link Between Religion and Politics,” U.N. WIRE, Mar. 18, 2004
Michael J. Perry, “Morality and Normativity,” 13 LEGAL THEORY 211, 236–48 (2008)
Amartya Sen, “Elements of a Theory of Human Rights,” 32 PHILOSOPY & PUBLIC AFFAIRS 35, 317 (2004)
Czeslaw Milosz, “The Religious Imagination at 2000,” NEW PERSPECTIVES QUARTERLY, Fall 1997
Timothy P. Jackson, “The Theory and Practice of Discomfort: Richard Rorty and Pragmatism,” 51 THOMIST 270, 284–85 (1987)
Warren Christopher, “Democracy and Human Rights: Where America Stands,” 4 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE DISPATCH 441, 442 (1993)
William W. Burke-White, “Human Rights and National Security: The Strategic Connection,” 17 HARVARD HUMAN RIGHTS J. 249 (2004)
Richard B. Bilder, “Human Rights and U.S. Foreign Policy: Short-Term Prospects,” 14 VIRGINIA J. INTERNATIONAL L. 597, 608 (1974)

Reference Type: notes

Peter Berger, “On the Obsolescence of the Concept of Honor,” in Stanley Hauerwas & Alasdair MacIntyre, eds., Revisions: Changing Perspectives in Moral Philosophy 172, 176 (1983)
Paul Finkelman, “Civil Rights in Historical Context: In Defense of Brown,” 118 HARVARD L. REV. 973 (2005)
John Corvino, “Homosexuality and the PIB Argument,” 115 ETHICS 501, 509 (2005)

Reference Type: notes

Edward J. Eberle, “Roger Williams' Gift: Religious Freedom in America,” ROGER WILLIAMS UNIVERSITY L. REV. 425, 441–42, 443 (1999)
Elizabeth Rubin, “The Jihadi Who Kept Asking Why,” NEW YORK TIMES MAGAZINE, Mar. 7, 2004
Steven D. Smith, “What Does Religion Have to Do with Freedom of Conscience?” 76 U. COLORADO L. REV. 911, 921 (2005)
Douglas Laycock, “Religious Liberty as Liberty,” 7 J. CONTEMPORARY LEGAL ISSUES 313, 317 (1996)
Derek H. Davis, “The Evolution of Religious Freedom as a Universal Human Right: Examining the Role of the 1981 United Nations Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief,” 2002 BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY L. REV. 217
“The Foundations and Frontiers of Religious Liberty: A 25th Anniversary Celebration of the 1981 U.N. Declaration on Religious Tolerance,” 21 EMORY INTERNATIONAL L. REV. 1–275 (2007)
John Witte, Jr., “Primer on the Rights and Wrongs of Proselytism,” 31 CUMBERLAND L. REV. 619, 627 (2001)
Caroline Frasier, “Suffering Children and the Christian Science Church,” ATLANTIC MONTHLY, April 1995, at 105
Benjamin D. Bleiberg, “Unveiling the Real Issue: Evaluating the European Court of Human Rights' Decision to Enforce the Turkish Headscarf Ban in Leyla Sahin v. Turkey,” 91 CORNELL L. REV. 129 (2005)
“Other Faiths Are Deficient, Pope Says,” TABLET [London], Feb. 5, 2000, at 157
Lawrie Breen, “A Chinese Puzzle,” TABLET [London], Mar. 5, 2005
John Perry, “John Locke's America: The Character of Liberal Democracy and Jeffrey Stout's Debate with the Christian Traditionalists,” 27 J. SOCIETY OF CHRISTIAN ETHICS 227 (2007)
Michael W. McConnell, “Establishment and Disestablishment at the Founding, Part I: Establishment of Religion,” 44 WILLIAM & MARY L. REV. 2105, 2182 (2003)
“Atheist Defends Belief in God,” TABLET [London], Mar. 24, 2007, at 33
Paul Cruickshank, “Covered Faces, Open Rebellion,” NEW YORK TIMES, Oct. 21, 2006
Leslie Griffin, “Commentary on Dignitatis humanae (Declaration on Religious Freedom), in Kenneth R. Himes, ed., MODERN CATHOLIC SOCIAL TEACHING: COMMENTARIES AND INTERPRETATIONS 244 (2004)
Michael Walsh, “U-turn on Human Rights,” TABLET [London], Dec. 14, 2002
John A. Coleman, SJ, “Religious Liberty: Unfinished Items from the Council,” AMERICA, Nov. 28, 2005, at 9
John Witte, Jr., “The Serpentine Wall of Separation,” 101 MICHIGAN L. REV. 1869, 1899–900 (2003)
“Religious Freedom Is Universal,” TABLET [London], Mar. 15, 2006
Francis Campbell, “No Future in the Ghetto,” TABLET [London], Feb. 1, 2008
“The Challenge for Islam,” TABLET [London], July 8, 2006, at 2

Reference Type: notes

Leslie Griffin, “Commentary on Dignitatis humanae (Declaration on Religious Freedom), in Kenneth R. Himes, ed., MODERN CATHOLIC SOCIAL TEACHING: COMMENTARIES AND INTERPRETATIONS 244 (2004)
Steven D. Smith, ‘What Does Religion Have to Do with Freedom of Conscience?’ 76 U. COLORADO L. REV. 911 (2005)
Robert P. George, “Law and Moral Purpose,” FIRST THINGS, January 2008, at 22
Michael W. McConnell, “The Problem of Singling Out Religion,” 50 DEPAUL L. REV. 1, 44 (2000)
Gregory A. Kalscheur, SJ, “Moral Limits on Morals Legislation: Lessons for U.S. Constitutional Law from the Declaration on Religious Freedom,” 16 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INTERDISCIPLINARY L. J. 1 (2006)
Douglas Laycock, “Regulatory Exemptions of Religious Behavior and the Original Understanding of the Establishment Clause,” 81 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1793, 1838–39 (2006)
Chad Flanders, “The Possibility of a Secular First Amendment,” 26 QUEEN'S L. REV. 257, 288–303 (2008)
Benjamin M. Eidelson, “A Penumbra Overlooked: The Free Exercise Clause and Lawrence v. Texas,” 30 HARVARD J. L. & GENDER 203 (2007)
Joseph Boyle, “Positivism, Natural Law, and Disestablishment,” 20 VALPARAISO L. REV. 55, 59 (1985)
Jeremy Waldron, “The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review,” 115 YALE L. J. 1346 (2006
James B. Thayer, “The Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law,” 7 HARVARD L. REV. 129, 130 (1893)

Reference Type: notes

Cécile Laborde, “Secular Philosophy and Muslim Headscarves in Schools,” 13 J. POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY 305, 308 (2005)
Kent Greenawalt, “Common Sense about Original and Subsequent Understandings of the Religion Clauses,” 8 J. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 479, 511 (2005)
Michael W. McConnell, “Accommodation of Religion: An Update and Response to the Critics,” 60 GEORGE WASHINGTON L. REV. 685, 690 (1992)
Michael W. McConnell, “Establishment and Disestablishment at the Founding, Part I: The Establishment of Religion,” 44 WM. & MARY L. REV. 2105 (2003)
Akhil Reed Amar, “Foreword: The Document and the Doctrine,” 114 HARVARD L. REV. 26, 119 (2000)
Cheryl Saunders, “Comment: Religion and the State,” 21 CARDOZO L. REV. 1295, 1295–96 (2000)
Clifford Longley, “Establishment – It's Got to Go,” TABLET [London], May 11, 2002
“The Act of Settlement Debate,” TABLET [London], Aug. 11, 2007
Tim Hames, “‘It would have been more honest to have called it the Dangerous Catholics Act,’” TABLET [London], Aug. 11, 2007
“Other Faiths Are Deficient, Pope Says,” TABLET [London], Feb. 5, 2000
Douglas Laycock, “Freedom of Speech That Is Both Religious and Political,” 29 U. CALIFORNIA, DAVIS L. REV. 793, 812–13 (1996)
“is in hopeless disarray.…” Rosenberger v. Rector and Visitors of University of Virginia, 515 U.S. 819, 861 (1995)
William Van Alstyne, “Ten Commandments, Nine Justices, and Five Versions of One Amendment – The First. (‘Now What?’),” 14 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 17 (2005)
Andrew Koppelman, “Secular Purpose,” 88 VIRGINIA L. REV. 87, 108 (2002)
Douglas Laycock, “Equal Access and Moments of Silence: The Equal Status of Religious Speech by Private Speakers,” 81 NORTHWESTERN U. L. REV. 1, 7 (1986)
Steven H. Shiffrin, “The Pluralistic Foundations of the Religion Clauses,” 90 CORNELL L. REV. 9, 72 (2004)
Paul Finkelman, “The Ten Commandments on the Courthouse Lawn and Elsewhere,” 73 FORDHAM L. REV. 1477, 1480–98 (2005)
Frederick Mark Gedicks & Roger Hendrix, “Uncivil Religion: Judeo-Christianity and the Ten Commandments,” 110 WEST VIRGINIA L. REV. 275 (2007)
Steven D. Smith, “Separation and the ‘Secular’: Reconstructing the Disestablishment Decision,” 67 TEXAS L. REV. 955, 973 [1989])
Steven G. Calabresi & Sarah E. Agudo, “Individual Rights Under State Constitutions When the Fourteenth Amendment Was Ratified in 1868: What Rights Are Deeply Rooted in American History and Tradition?,” 87 TEXAS L. REV. 7, 37 (2008)
“A Nation of Christians Is Not a Christian Nation,” NEW YORK TIMES, Oct. 7, 2007
Steven G. Gey, “‘Under God,’ the Pledge of Allegiance, and Other Constitutional Trivia,” 81 NORTH CAROLINA L. REV. 1865, 1866–69 (2003)
Evelyn Nieves, “Judges Ban Pledge of Allegiance from Schools, Citing ‘Under God’,” NEW YORK TIMES, June 27, 2002
Howard Fineman, “One Nation, Under…Who?,” NEWSWEEK, July 8, 2002
Steven H. Shiffrin, “Liberalism and the Establishment Clause,” 78 CHICAGO-KENT L. REV. 717, 727 (2003)
G. F. Whyte, “The Frontiers of Religious Liberty: A Commonwealth Celebration of the 25th Anniversary of the U.N. Declaration on Religious Tolerance – Ireland,” 21 EMORY INTERNATIONAL L. REV. 43 (2007)
Richard John Neuhaus, “Nasty and Nice in Politics and Religion in the Public Sqare: A Survey of Religion and Public Life,” FIRST THINGS, March 2004
Douglas Laycock, “Theology Scholarships, the Pledge of Allegiance, and Religious Liberty: Avoiding the Extremes, Missing the Liberty,” 118 HARVARD L. REV. 155, 224–27 (2004)
Kent Greenawalt, “History as Ideology: Philip Hamburger's Separation of Church and State,” 93 CALIFORNIA L. REV. 367, 390–91 (2005)
Derek H. Davis, “Is Atheism a Religion? Recent Judicial Perspectives on the Constitutional Meaning of ‘Religion’,” 47 J. CHURCH & STATE 707 (2005)
Steven Shiffrin, “Religion and Democracy,” 74 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1631, 1652–56 (1999)

Reference Type: notes

Alan Wolfe, “Mobilizing the Religious Left,” NEW YORK TIMES BOOK REV., Oct. 21, 2007
Sheryl Gay Stolberg, “Shifting Certainties in the Abortion War,” NEW YORK TIMES, Jan. 11, 1998
John Schwartz, “When Torment Is Baby's Destiny, Euthanasia Is Defended,” NEW YORK TIMES, Mar. 10, 2005
Associated Press, “Study: Newborn Euthanasia Often Unreported,” NEW YORK TIMES, Mar. 10, 2005
H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr., “Moral Knowledge: Some Reflections on Moral Controversies, Incompatible Moral Epistemologies, and the Culture Wars,” 10 CHRISTIAN BIOETHICS 79, 84 (2004)
Laurence H. Tribe, “Will the Abortion Fight Ever End?; A Nation Held Hostage,” NEW YORK TIMES, July 2, 1990
Mary B. Mahowald, “Conception vs. Fertilization,” COMMONWEAL, Sept. 9, 2005, at 40
Garry Wills, “The Bishops vs. the Bible,” NEW YORK TIMES, June 27, 2004
Joseph F. Donceel, SJ, “Immediate Animation and Delayed Homonization,” 31 THEOLOGICAL STUDIES 76 (1970)
Joseph F. Donceel, SJ, “A Liberal Catholic's View,” in Robert Hall, ed., Abortion in a Changing World 39 (1970)
Thomas A. Shannon, “Human Embryonic Stem Cell Therapy,” 62 THEOLOGICAL STUDIES 811, 814–21 (2001)
Jean Porter, “Is the Embryo a Person? Arguing with the Catholic Traditions,” COMMONWEAL, Feb. 8, 2002, at 8
John Haldane & Patrick Lee, “Aquinas on Ensoulment, Abortion and the Value of Life,” 78 PHILOSOPHY 255 (2003)
Robert Pasnau, “Souls and the Beginning of Life (A Reply to Haldane & Lee),” 78 PHILOSOPHY 521 (2003)
John Haldane & Patrick Lee, “Rational Souls and the Beginning of Life,” 78 PHILOSOPHY 532 (2003)
Anthony Kenny, “The Soul Issue,” TIMES LIT. SUPP., Mar. 7, 2003, at 12
Peter Steinfels, “The Search for an Alternative,” COMMONWEAL, NOV. 20, 1981
David DeGrazia, “Identity, Killing, and the Boundaries of Our Existence,” 31 PHILOSOPHY & PUBLIC AFFAIRS 414, 428–30 (2003)
Jeff McMahan, “Paradoxes of Abortion and Prenatal Injury,” 116 ETHICS 625, 627 (2006)
John Langan, “Observations on Abortion and Politics,” AMERICA, Oct. 25, 2004
Michael J. Perry, “Morality and Normativity,” 13 LEGAL THEORY 211 (2007)
Michael J. Wreen, “The Standing Is Slippery,” 79 PHILOSOPHY 553, 571–72 (2004)
Robert P. George & Patrick Lee, “Acorns and Embryos,” THE NEW ATLANTIS, Fall 2004/Winter 2004
Michael S. Gazzaniga, “The Thoughtful Distinction Between Embryo and Human,” THE CHRONICLE REVIEW, Apr. 8, 2005
Anthony Kenny, “Life Stories: When an Individual Life Begins – and the Ethics of Ending It,” TIMES LIT. SUPP., Mar. 25, 2005, at 3
Richard A. McCormick, SJ, “The Gospel of Life,” AMERICA, Apr. 29, 1995, at 12, 13
John Langan, SJ, “Observations on Abortion and Politics,” AMERICA, Oct. 25, 2004
Clifford Longley, “‘The Church Hasn't Yet Made a Mature Appraisal of What Democracy Demands’,” TABLET [London], May 7, 2005, at 11
John Hart Ely, “The Wages of Crying Wolf: A Comment on Roe v. Wade,” 82 YALE L. J. 920, 923 (1973)
Gene Outka, “The Ethics of Human Stem Cell Research,” in Brent Waters & Ronald Cole-Turner, eds., God and the Embryo: Religious Voices on Stem Cell and Cloning 29 (2003)

Reference Type: notes

David S. Buckel, “Government Affixes a Label of Inferiority on Same-Sex Couples When It Imposes Civil Unions & Denies Access to Marriage,” 16 STANFORD L. & POL'Y REV. 73 (2005)
Andrew Koppelman, “Civil Conflict and Same-Sex Civil Unions,” RESPONSIVE COMMUNITY, Spring/Summer 2004, at 20
Adam Liptak, “Caution in Court for Gay Rights Groups,” NEW YORK TIMES, Nov. 12, 2004
Alison Leigh Cowan, “Gay Couples Say Civil Unions Aren't Enough,” NEW YORK TIMES, Mar. 17, 2008
Edward Rothstein, “Annals of Homosexuality: From Greek to Grim to Gay,” NEW YORK TIMES, Dec. 13, 2003
Andrew Koppelman, “Are the Boy Scouts Being as Bad as Racists? Judging the Scouts' Antigay Policy,” 18 PUBLIC AFFAIRS QUARTERLY 363, 372 (2004)
Andrew Koppelman, “You Can't Hurry Love: Why Antidiscrimination Protections for Gay People Should Have Religious Exemptions,” 72 BROOKLYN L. REV. 125, 145 (2006)
USCCB Administrative Committee, “Promote, Protect, Preserve Marriage: Statement on Marriage and Homosexual Unions,” 33 ORIGINS 257, 259 (2003)
Robert F. Nagel, “Playing Defense in Colorado,” FIRST THINGS, May 1998, at 34, 35
Kenji Yoshino, “Marriage Partners,” NEW YORK TIMES MAGAZINE, June 1, 2008
Linda C. McClain, “God's Created Order, Gender Complementarity, and the Federal Marriage Amendment,” 20 BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY J. PUBLIC LAW 313 (2006)
Peter Berkowitz, “Illiberal Liberalism,” FIRST THINGS, April 2007, at 50, 54
Stephen J. Pope, “The Magisterium's Arguments against ‘Same-Sex Marriage’: An Ethical Analysis and Critique,” 65 THEOLOGICAL STUDIES 530, 559 (2004)
Geoffrey Nunberg, “We the People? (In Order to Form a More Perfect Gay Union),” NEW YORK TIMES, Feb. 22, 2004
Jonathan Rauch, “Family's Value: Gay Marriage Is Good for Kids,” NEW REPUBLIC, May 30, 2005, at 15
Rosemary Radford Ruether, “Marriage Between Homosexuals Is Good for Marriage,” NATIONAL CATHOLIC RPTR., Nov. 18, 2005, at 20
Roderick M. Hills, Jr., “You Say You Want a Revolution? The Case Against the Transformation of Culture Through Moral Equality Laws,” 95 MICHIGAN L. REV. 1588, 1610–11 (1997)
Martha C. Nussbaum, “Platonic Love and Colorado Law: The Relevance of Ancient Greek Norms to Modern Sexual Controversies,” 80 VIRGINIA L. REV. 1515, 1601 (1994)
Andrew Koppelman, “Three Arguments for Gay Rights,” 95 MICHIGAN L. REV. 1636, 1666 (1997)
Andrew Sullivan, “Three's a Crowd,” NEW REPUBLIC, June 17, 1996, at 10, 12
David Brooks, “The Power of Marriage,” NEW YORK TIMES, Nov. 22, 2003
Ben Schuman, “Gods & Gays: Analyzing the Same-Sex Marriage Debate from a Religious Perspective,” 96 GEORGETOWN L. J. 2103, 2121–24 (2008)
USCCB Administrative Committee, “Statement on Marriage and Homosexual Unions,” 33 ORIGINS 257, 259 (2003)
Robert P. George, “Law and Moral Purpose,” FIRST THINGS, January 2008, at 25–28
“Bishop Brings Reason to Issue of Gay Benefits,” NATIONAL CATHOLIC RPTR., Nov. 7, 2003, at 24
“Nuncio Backs ‘Right’ to Gay Unions,” TABLET [London], May 15, 2004, at 30
“Sign of the Times,” AMERICA, Nov. 15, 2004, at 4, 5
Jennifer 8. Lee, “Congressman Says Bush Is Open to States' Bolstering Gay Rights,” NEW YORK TIMES, Feb. 9, 2004
Brian Lavery, “Ireland: Premier Backs Rights for Gay Couples,” NEW YORK TIMES, Nov. 16, 2004
Edward Collins Vacek, SJ, “The Meaning of Marriage: Of Two Minds,” COMMONWEAL, Oct. 24, 2003
Peter Slevin, “33 Pastors Flout Tax Law With Political Sermons,” WASHINGTON POST, Sept. 29, 2008
Nicholas D. Kristof, “Lovers Under the Skin,” NEW YORK TIMES, Dec. 3, 2003

Reference Type: notes

William N. Eskridge, Jr., “America's Statutory ‘Constitution,’” 41 U. CALIFORNIA, DAVIS L. REV. 1 (2007)
(see William J. Brennan, Jr., “The Worldwide Influence of the United States Constitution as a Charter of Human Rights,” 15 NOVA L. REV. [1991])
Christina Murray, “A Constitutional Beginning: Making South Africa's Final Constitution,” 23 U. ARKANSAS AT LITTLE ROCK L. REV. 809 (2001)
Larry A. Alexander, “Constitutionalism,” in Martin P. Golding & William A. Edmundson, eds., The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory 248, 255 (2004)
James B. Thayer, “The Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law,” 7 HARVARD L. REV. 129, 130 (1893)
James Allan, “A Defense of the Status Quo,” in Tom Campbell et al., eds., Protecting Human Rights: Instruments and Institutions 175 (2003)
James Allan, “Rights, Paternalism, Constitutions and Judges,” in Grant Huscroft & Paul Rishworth, eds., Litigating Rights: Perspectives from Domestic and International Law 29 (2002)
G. W. G. Leane, “Enacting Bills of Rights: Canada and the Curious Case of New Zealand's ‘Thin’ Democracy,” 26 HUMAN RIGHTS QUARTERLY 152 (2004)
James Allan, “The Effect of a Statutory Bill of Rights Where Parliament Is Sovereign: The Lesson from New Zealand,” in Tom Campbell et al., eds., Sceptical Essays on Human Rights 375 (2001)
Larry D. Kramer, “Foreword: We the Court,” 115 HARVARD L. REV. 4 (2001)
Robert C. Post & Reva B. Siegel, “Protecting the Constitution from the People: Juricentric Restrictions on Section Five Power,” 78 INDIANA L. J. 1 (2003)
“One Hundred Years of Judicial Review: The Thayer Centennial Symposium,” 88 NORTHWESTERN U. L. REV. 1–468 (1993)
Leonard W. Levy, “Editorial Note,” in Leonard W. Levy, ed., Judicial Review and the Supreme Court: Selected Essays 84 (1967)
Wallace Mendelson, “The Influence of James B. Thayer upon the Work of Holmes, Brandeis, and Frankfurter,” 31 VANDERBILT L. REV. 71 (1978)
James Bradley Thayer, “Constitutionality of Legislation: The Precise Question for a Court,” THE NATION, Apr. 10, 1884, at 315)
Allan C. Hutchinson, “Waiting for CORAF (or the Beatification of the Charter),” 41 U. TORONTO L. J. 332, 358 (1991)
Allan C. Hutchinson, “Supreme Court Inc: The Business of Democracy and Rights,” in Gavin W. Anderson, ed., Rights & Democracy: Essays in UK–Canadian Constitutionalism 29 (1999)
Richard A. Posner, “Review of Jeremy Waldron, Law and Disagreement,” 100 COLUMBIA L. REV. 582, 592 (2000)
Mitchell N. Berman, “Constitutional Decision Rules,” 90 VIRGINIA L. REV. 1, 102–04 (2004)
Richard A. Posner, “Enlightened Despot,” NEW REPUBLIC, Apr. 23, 2007, at 53, 55
“Commemorating Twenty-Five Years of Judge Richard A. Posner,” 74 U. CHICAGO L. REV. 1641–931 (2007)
Jeremy Waldron, “The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review,” 115 YALE L. J. 1346, 1366 (2006)
Lord Scarman, “Britain and the Protection of Human Rights,” 15 CAMBRIAN L. REV. 5, 10 (1984)
Mac Darrow & Philip Alston, “Bills of Rights in Comparative Perspective,” in Philip Alston, ed., Promoting Human Rights Through Bills of Rights: Comparative Perspectives 465, 493 (1999)
Jeremy Waldron, “A Right-Based Critique of Constitutional Rights,” 13 OXFORD J. LEGAL STUDIES 18, 50–51 (1993)
Paul Finkelman, “Civil Rights in Historical Context: In Defense of Brown,” 118 HARVARD L. REV. 973 (2005)
Robbie Brown, “Antipathy Toward Obama Seen as Helping Arkansas Limit Adoption,” NEW YORK TIMES, Nov. 8, 2008
Dan Savage, “Anti-Gay, Anti-Family,” NEW YORK TIMES, Nov. 12, 2008
Stephen A. Siegel, “The Origin of the Compelling State Interest Test and Strict Scrutiny,” 48 AMERICAN J. LEGAL HISTORY 355 (2006)
Michael J. Perry, “The Disproportionate Impact Theory of Racial Discrimination,” 125 U. PENNSYLVANIA L. REV. 540 (1977)
Marriage Cases, 183 P.3d 384, 444 (California 2008)
Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public Health, 957 A. 2d 407 (Connecticut 2008)
Varnum v. Brien, 763 N.W. 2d 862 (Iowa 2009)
Jeremy Rabkin, “Private Preferences: Why Affirmative Action Won't Disappear Anytime Soon,” AMERICAN SPECTATOR, November 1998, 62, 63
J. M. Balkin, “The Constitution of Status,” 106 YALE L. J. 2313, 2352–53 (1997)
Stephen L. Carter, “When Victims Happen To Be Black,” 97 YALE L. J. 420, 433–43 (1988)
John Hart Ely, “The Wages of Crying Wolf: A Comment on Roe v. Wade,” 82 YALE L. J. 920 (1973)
Jeffrey Goldsworthy, “Raz on Constitutional Interpretation,” 22 LEGAL PHILOSOPHY 167, 193 (2003)
Richard S. Kay, “Original Intention and Public Meaning in Constitutional Interpretation,” 103 NORTHWESTERN L. REV. 703 (2009)
Vesan Kesavan & Michael Stokes Paulsen, “The Interpretive Force of the Constitution's Secret Drafting History,” 91 GEORGETOWN L. J. 1113, 1162 [2002–03])
Robert G. Natelson, “The Founders' Hermeneutic: The Real Original Understanding of Original Intent,” 68 OHIO STATE L. J. 1239, 1305 (2007)
Andrew O'Hagan, “Word Wizard,” NEW YORK REV. BOOKS, Apr. 27, 2006, at 12, 12
William J. Brennan, Jr., “Constitutional Adjudication and the Death Penalty: A View from the Court,” 100 HARVARD L. REV. 313, 324 (1986)
Shannon D. Gilreath, “Cruel and Unusual Punishment and the Eighth Amendment as a Mandate for Human Dignity: Another Look at Original Intent,” 25 THOMAS JEFFERSON L. REV. 559, 571–84 (2003)
Andrew Oldenquist, “Retribution and the Death Penalty,” 20 U. DAYTON L. REV. 335, 340–43 (2004)
Keith E. Whittington, “The New Originalism,” 2 GEORGETOWN J. L. & PUBLIC POLICY 599, 610 (2004)
Lawrence B. Solum, “On the Indeterminacy Crisis: Critiquing Critical Dogma,” 54 U. CHICAGO L. REV. 462 (1987)
Kent Greenawalt, “How Law Can be Determinate,” 31 UCLA L. REV. 1, 29 (1990)
Neil MacCormick, “Reconstruction after Deconstruction: A Response to CLS,” 10 OXFORD J. LEGAL STUDIES 539, 548 (1990)
Citing J. M. Finnis, “On the Critical Legal Studies Movement,” 30 AMERICAN J. JURISPRUDENCE 21, 23–25 (1985)
Anthony T. Kronman, “Living in the Law,” 54 U. CHICAGO L. REV. 835, 847–48 (1987)
Michael W. McConnell, “Active Liberty: A Progressive Alternative to Textualism and Originalism?,” 119 HARVARD L. REV. 2387, 2417 (2006)
Charles L. Black, Jr., “‘One Nation Indivisible’: Unnamed Human Rights in the States,” 65 ST. JOHN'S L. REV. 17, 55 (1991)
Aviam Soifer, “Text-Mess: There Is No Textual Basis for Application of the Takings Clause to the States,” 28 U. HAWAII L. REV. 373 (2006)
Mitchell N. Berman, “Originalism Is Bunk,” 84 NYU L. REV. 1, 33–36 (2009)
Kurt T. Lash, “Originalism, Popular Sovereignty, and Stare Decisis,” 93 VIRGINIA L. REV. 1437, 1481 (2007)

Reference Type: notes

Frank I. Michelman, “Socioeconomic Rights in Constitutional Law: Explaining America Away,” 6 INTERNATIONAL J. CONSTITUTIONAL L. 663 (2008)
Robbie Brown, “Antipathy Toward Obama Seen as Helping Arkansas Limit Adoption,” NEW YORK TIMES, Nov. 9, 2008
Dan Savage, “Anti-Gay, Anti-Family,” NEW YORK TIMES, Nov. 12, 2008