Acceptable Premises

An Epistemic Approach to an Informal Logic Problem

Acceptable Premises
  • By James B. Freeman

  • Publisher: Cambridge University Press

    Online Publication Date:December 2009

    Online ISBN:9780511610301

    Hardback ISBN:9780521833011

    Paperback ISBN:9780521540605

  • Book DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610301

    Subjects: Logic

When, if ever, is one justified in accepting the premises of an argument? What is the proper criterion of premise acceptability? Providing a comprehensive theory of premise acceptability, this book answers these questions from an epistemological approach that the author calls "common sense foundationalism". His work will be of interest to specialists in informal logic, critical thinking and argumentation theory as well as to a broader range of philosophers and those teaching rhetoric.


 Reviews:

"..fine book...A particular merit of his foundationalism is its breath....an important contribution to epistemology of ethics... -David Hitchcock, McMaster University, Philosophical Inquiry.

'… the book is well-written and well-organized. It may be used as a handbook of commonsense foundationalism.' Argumentation

Alston, William. 1967. “Motives and Motivation.” The Encyclopedia of Philosophy 5: 399–409. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company and The Free Press
Alston, William. 1983. “What's Wrong With Immediate Knowledge?” Synthese 55: 73–95
Alston, William. 1985. “Concepts of Epistemic Justification.” Monist 68: 57–89
Alston, William. 1988. “An Internalist Externalism.” Synthese 74: 265–83
Audi, Robert. 1997. Moral Knowledge and Ethical Character. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press
Aune, Bruce. 1967. “Intention.” The Encyclopedia of Philosophy 4: 198–201. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company and The Free Press
Beanblossom, Ronald E, and Keith Lehrer, eds. 1983. Thomas Reid's Inquiry and Essays. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company
Beanblossom, Ronald E. 1983. Introduction to Thomas Reid's Inquiry and Essays: ⅹ–ⅼⅶ. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company
Beardsley, Monroe C. 1975. Thinking Straight: Principles of Reasoning for Readers and Writers 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
Blair, J. Anthony, and Ralph H. Johnson. 1987. “Argumentation as Dialectical.” Argumentation 1: 41–56
Blair, J. Anthony. 1986. “Acceptability as the Criterion of Premise Adequacy in Arguments.” Unpublished manuscript
Blair, J. Anthony. 1995. “Premiss Adequacy,” in Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair, and Charles A. Willard, eds., Analysis and Evaluation: Proceedings of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation 2: 191–202. Amsterdam: Sic Sat
BonJour, Laurence. 1978. “Can Empirical Knowledge Have a Foundation?” American Philosophical Quarterly 15: 1–13
BonJour, Laurence. 1985. The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Bradley, Raymond, and Norman Swartz. 1979. Possible Worlds: An Introduction to Logic and Its Philosophy. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company
Broad, C. D. 1952. “Some Reflections on Moral-Sense Theories in Ethics.” in Wilfrid Sellars and John Hospers, eds. Readings in Ethical Theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts
Burks, Arthun W. 1951. “The Logic of Causal Propositions.” Mind 60: 363–82
Carnap, Rudolf. 1947. Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Cederblom, Jerry, and David Paulsen. 1988. “Making Reasonable Decisions as an Amateur in a World of Experts,” in Trudy Govier, ed. Selected Issues in Logic and Communication. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company
Clarke, D. S., Jr. 1989. Rational Acceptance and Purpose: An Outline of a Pragmatist Epistemology. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
Coady, C. A. J. 1992. Testimony: A Philosophical Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Cohen, L. Jonathan. 1986. The Dialogue of Reason: An Analysis of Analytical Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Cohen, L. Jonathan. 1992. An Essay on Belief and Acceptance. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Conee, Earl. 1988. “The Basic Nature of Epistemic Justification.” Monist 71: 389–404
Damasio, Antonio R. 1994. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: G. P. Putnam
Daniels, Charles B., and James B. Freeman. 1980. “An Analysis of the Subjunctive Conditional.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 21: 639–55
Descartes, Rene. 1960. Discourse on Method and Meditations. Indianapolis and New York: Bobbs-Merrill
Fahnestock, Jeanne, and Marie Secor. 1982. A Rhetoric of Argument. New York: Random House
Feldman, Richard, and Earl Conee. 1985. “Evidentialism.” Philosophical Studies 48: 15–34
Firth, Roderick. 1978. “Are Epistemic Concepts Reducible to Ethical Concepts?” in A. Goldman and J. Kim, eds., Values and Morals: 215–29. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing
Fisher, Alec. 2000. “Informal Logic and Its Implications for Philosophy.” Informal Logic 20: 109–15
Fogelin, Robert J. 1982. Understanding Arguments: An Introduction to Informal Logic 2nd ed. New York: Harcourt Brace & Company
Frankena, William K. 1973. Ethics 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
Freeman, James B. 1983. “Logical Form, Probability Interpretations, and the Inductive/Deductive Distinction.” Informal Logic Newsletter 5: 2–10
Freeman, James B. 1991. Dialectics and the Macrostructure of Arguments. Berlin and New York: Foris Publications
Freeman, James B. 1993. Thinking Logically: Basic Concepts for Reasoning 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
Freeman, James B. 1996. “Epistemic Justification and Premise Acceptability.” Argumentation 10: 59–68
Freeman, James B. 2000. “What Types of Statements Are There?” Argumentation 14: 135–57
Freeman, James B. 2003. “The Pragmatic Dimension of Premise Acceptability,” in Frans H. van Eemeren, J. Anthony Blair, Charles Willard, and A. Francisca Snoeck-Henkemans, eds., Anyone Who Has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation: 17–26. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 17–26
Gettier, Edmund L. 1963. “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?” Analysis 23: 121–3
Govier, Trudy. 1981. “Theory, Common Sense, and Certainty.” Metaphilosophy 12: 31–46
Govier, Trudy. 1985. A Practical Study of Argument. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company
Govier, Trudy. 1987. Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation. Dordrecht and Providence: Foris Publications
Grennan, Wayne. 1984. Argument Evaluation. Lanham, MD: University Press of America
Grennan, Wayne. 1987. “A ‘Logical Audit’ Scheme for Argument Evaluation,” in Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair, and Charles A. Willard, eds., Argumentation: Analysis and Practices: Proceedings of the Conference on Argumentation 1986: 17–24. Dordrecht and Providence: Foris Publications
Hallie, Philip P. 1967. “Pyrrho.” Encyclopedia of Philosophy 7: 36–37, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company and The Free Press
Hamblin, C. L. 1970. Fallacies. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd
Harrison, Jonathan. 1967. “Ethical Objectivism.” Encyclopedia of Philosophy 3: 71–75, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company and The Free Press
Heysse, T. 1991. “Truth and a Theory of Argumentation,” in Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair, and Charles A. Wlllard, eds., Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Argumentation: 84–91. Amsterdam: International Society for the Study of Argumentation
Hitchcock, David. 1985. “Enthymematic Arguments.” Informal Logic 7: 83–97
Hume, David. 1875. Essays: Moral, Political and Literary 2. London: Longmans, Green
Hume, David. 1888. A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Johnson, Ralph H. 1990. “Acceptance is Not Enough: A Critique of Hamblin.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 23 271–87
Jung, C. G. 1944. Psychological Types or The Psychology of Individuation. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company
Kornblith, Hilary. 1993. Inductive Inference and Its Natural Ground: An Essay in Naturalistic Epistemology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Kruger, Arthur N. 1975. “The Nature of Controversial Statements.” Philosophy & Rhetoric 8: 137–58
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Laplace, Pierre Marquis de. 1951. A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities. New York: Dover Publications
Leblanc, Hugues and William A. Wisdom. 1976. Deductive Logic 2nd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon
Lehrer, Keith. 1989. Thomas Reid. London and New York: Routledge
Lennox, James G. 1992. “Philosophy of Biology,” in Merrilee H. Salmon, John Earman, Clark Glymour, James G. Lennox, Peter Machamer, J. E. Mc Guire, John D. Norton, Wesley C. Salmon, and Kenneth F. Schaffner, Intro-duction to the Philosophy of Science: 269–309. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
Locke, John. 1961. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London: J. M. Dent
McKeon, Richard, ed. 1941. The Basic Works of Aristotle. New York: Random House
MacLagan, W. G. 1960a. “Respect for Persons as a Moral Principle – I.” Philosophy 35: 193–217
MacLagan, W. G. 1960b. “Respect for Persons as a Moral Principle – II.” Philosophy 35: 280–305
Medin, Douglas L. 1989. “Concepts and Conceptual Structure.” American Psychologist 44: 1469–81
Medin, Douglas L., and Andrew Ortony. 1989. “Comments on Part I: Psychological Essentialism,” in S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony, eds., Similarity and Analogical Reasoning: 179–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Meilaender, Gilbert C. 1991. Faith and Faithfulness: Basic Themes in Christian Ethics. Notre Dame and London: University of Notre Dame Press
Moore, Brooke Noel, and Richard Parker. 1986. Critical Thinking: Evaluating Claims and Arguments in Everyday Life. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company
Moore, George Edward. 1903. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Myers, Isabel Briggs. 1980. Introduction to Type 3rd ed. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press
Nagel, Ernest. 1961. The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & Company
Nolt, John Eric. 1984. Informal Logic: Possible Worlds and Imagination. New York: McGraw-Hill
Paton, H. J. 1948. The Moral Law: Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals. London: Hutchinson University Library
Peirce, Charles S. 1955. Philosophical Writings of Peirce. New York: Dover Publications
Perelman, C., and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame and London: University of Notre Dame Press
Pinto, R. C. 1984. “Dialectic and the Structure of Argument.” Informal Logic 6: 16–20
Plantinga, Alvin. 1993a. Warrant: The Current Debate. New York: Oxford University Press
Plantinga, Alvin. 1993b. Warrant and Proper Function. New York: Oxford University Press
Popkin, Richard H. 1967. “Skepticism.” Encyclopedia of Philosophy 7: 449–61. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company and The Free Press
Quine, Willard van Orman, and J. S. Ullian. 1978. The Web of Belief 2nd ed. New York: Random House
Quine, Willard van Orman. 1961. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” in From a Logical Point of View 2nd ed.: 20–46. New York: Harper Torchbooks
Quine, Willard van Orman. 1969. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press
Quine, Willard van Orman. 1970. Philosophy of Logic. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
Quinton, Anthony. 1967. “The A Priori and the Analytic,” in P. F. Strawson, ed., Philosophical Logic: 107–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Randall, John Herman, Jr. 1960. Aristotle. New York: Columbia University Press
Raphael, D. Daiches. 1947. The Moral Sense. London: Oxford University Press
Rescher, Nicholas. 1977a. Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge. Albany: State University of New York Press
Rescher, Nicholas. 1977b. Methodological Pragmatism. New York: New York University Press
Rescher, Nicholas. 1988. Rationality: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Nature and the Rationale of Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Ross, W. D. 1930. The Right and the Good. Oxford: The Clarendon Press
Ryle, Gilbert. 1949. The Concept of Mind. New York: Barnes and Noble
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Searle, John R. 1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Secor, Marie. 1998. “Response to Freeman,” in Hans V. Hansen, Christopher W. Tindale, and Athena V. Colman, eds., Argumentation & Rhetoric. St. Catharines, Canada: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation
Skagestad, Peter. 1981. The Road of Inquiry: Charles Peirce's Pragmatic Realism. New York: Columbia University Press
Skyrms, Brian. 1986. Choice and Chance: An Introduction to Inductive Logic 3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company
Smith, Adam. 1976. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Sprague, Elmer. 1967. “Moral Sense.” Encyclopedia of Philosophy 5: 385–7. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company and The Free Press
Sproule, J. Michael. 1976. “The Psychological Burden of Proof: On the Evolutionary Development of Richard Whatley's Theory of Presumption.” Communication Monographs 43: 115–29
Sproule, J. Michael. 1980. Argument: Language and Its Influence. New York: McGraw-Hill
Stevenson, Charles L. 1944. Ethics and Language. New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press
Stough, Charlotte L. 1969. Greek Skepticism: A Study in Epistemology. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press
Swinburne, Richard. 1996. Is There a God? Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press
Thomas, Stephen Naylor. 1991. Argument Evaluation. Tampa, FL: Worthington Publishing Company
Toulmin, Stephen. 1958. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Ullmann-Margalit, Edna. 1983. “On Presumption.” The Journal of Philosophy 80: 143–63
Walton, Douglas N. 1988. “Burden of Proof.” Argumentation 2: 233–54
Wellman, Carl. 1971. Challenge and Response: Justification in Ethics. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press
Whatley, Richard. 1968. “Presumption and Burden of Proof,” in Jerry Anderson and Paul J. Dovre, eds. 1968. Readings in Argumentation: 26–29. Boston: Allyn and Bacon
Wilson, James Q. 1993. The Moral Sense. New York: The Free Press