The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany


The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany

Constitutional courts have emerged as central institutions in many advanced democracies. This book investigates the sources and the limits of judicial authority, focusing on the central role of public support for judicial independence. The empirical sections of the book illustrate the theoretical argument in an in-depth study of the German Federal Constitutional Court, including statistical analysis of judicial decisions, case studies, and interviews with judges and legislators. The book's major finding is that the interests of governing majorities, prevailing public opinion, and the transparency of the political environment exert a powerful influence on judicial decisions. Judges are influenced not only by jurisprudential considerations and their policy preferences, but also by strategic concerns. By highlighting this dimension of constitutional review, the book challenges the contention that high court justices are largely unconstrained actors as well as the notion that constitutional courts lack democratic legitimacy.


 Reviews:

"...Georg Vanberg's book is a welcome addition to the liteature on Germany's Federal Constitutional Court...The virtue of this book is that it builds on the empirical work of comparative judicial scholars...and mainly for the purpose of offering the discipline a more systematic means of measuring the political impact of constitutional courts in both mature and transitional democracies." - Perspectives on Politics, Donald P. Kommers, University of Notre Dame

Reference Title: Bibliography

Reference Type: bibliography

Reference Type: bibliography

Adenauer, Konrad. 1966. Erinnerungen Band 1:1953–1955. Stuttgart: Deutscher Bücherbund
Alexander, Herbert (ed.). 1989. Comparative Political Finance in the 1980s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Alexander, Herbert, and Rei Shiratori (eds.). 1994. Comparative Political Finance among the Democracies. Boulder: Westview Press
Alter, Karen. 1998. “Who Are the Masters of the Treaty? European Governments and the European Count of Justice.” International Organization 52:125–52
Alter, Karen. 2001. Establishing the Supremacy of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Arnim, Hans Herbert von. 1993. Der Staat als Beute: Wie Politiker in eigener Sache Gesetze machen. München: Knaur
Arnim, Hans Herbert von. 1996. Die Partei, der Abgeordnete und das Geld: Parteienfinanzierung in Deutschland. München: Knaur
Arnim, Hans Herbert von. 2002. “Die Neue Parteienfinanzierung.” Deutsches Verwaltungsblatt. 16/2002:1065–78
Arnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven: Yale University Press
Baring, Arnulf. 1969. Außenpolitik in Adenauers Kanzlerdemokratie. München: R. Oldenbourg Verlag
Bark, Dennis, and David Gress. 1993. From Shadow to Substance 1945–1963. Oxford: Blackwell
Bates, Robert, Avner Greif, Margaret Levi, Jean-Laurent Rosenthal, and Barry Weingast. 1998. Analytic Narratives. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Baum, Lawrence. 1976. “Implementation of Judicial Decisions.” American Politics Quarterly 4:86–114
Baum, Lawrence. 1981. “Comparing the Implementation of Legislative and Judicial Policies.” In Daniel Mazmanian and Paul Sabatier (eds.). Effective Policy Implementation. Lexington: Lexington Books
Bickel, Alexander. 1962. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. New York: Bobbs-Merrill
Blair, Philip. 1981. Federalism and Judicial Review in West Germany. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Blankenburg, Erhard, Rainer Staudhammer, and Heinz Steiner. 1990. “Political Scandals and Corruption Issues in West Germany.” In A. Heidenheimer, M. Johnston, and V. Levine (eds.). Political Corruption: A Handbook. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers
Boldt, Hans. 1993. Deutsche Verfassungsgeschichte. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag
Booms, Hans. (ed.). 1989. Die Kabinettsprotokolle der Bundesregierung: Band 5: 1952. Boppard am Rhein: Harald Boldt Verlag
Bösch, Frank. 2001. “Die Enstehung des CDU-Spendensystems und die Konsolidierung der deutschen Parteinlandschaft.” Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaft. 49:695–711
Brace, Paul, and Laura Langer. 2001. “The Preemptive Power of State Supreme Courts: Enactment of Abortion and Death Penalty Laws in the American States.” Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association meeting, Chicago, April 19–22
Brewer Carias, A. R. 1989. Judicial Review in Comparative Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Buchstab, Günter. (ed.). 1986. Die Protokolle des CDU-Bundesvorstandes 1950–1953. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta Verlag
Buchstab, Günter (ed.). 1990. Die Protokolle des CDU-Bundesvorstandes 1953–1957. Düsseldorf: Droste Verlag
Caldeira, Greg. 1986. “Neither the Purse Nor the Sword: Dynamics of Public Confidence in the Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 80:1–2
Caldeira, Greg. 1987. “Public Opinion and the U.S. Supreme Court: FDR's Court Packing Plan.” American Political Science Review 81:1–1
Caldeira, Greg, and James Gibson. 1992. “The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 36:635–64
Caldeira, Greg, and John Wright. 1990. “Amici Curiae before the Supreme Court: Who Participates, When, and How Much?” The Journal of Politics 52:782–806
Canache, Damarys. 1999. Political Support in a Fragile Democracy. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pittsburgh
Canon, Bradley, and Charles Johnson. 1999. Judicial Policies: Implementation and Impact. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press
Capelletti, Mauro. 1989. The Judicial Process in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Carrubba, Clifford. 2003. “The Politics of Supranational Legal Integration: National Governments, the European Court of Justice, and the Development of EU Law.” Manuscript, Department of Political Science, Emory University
Carrubba, Clifford, and James Rogers. 2003. “National Judicial Power and the Dormant Commerce Clause.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 19:543–70
Clinton, Robert. 1994. “Game-Theory, Legal History, and the Origins of Judicial Review: A Revisionist Analysis of Marbury v. Madison.” American Journal of Political Science 38:285–302
Dahl, Robert. 1957. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law 6:279–95
Dahl, Robert. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press
Dehousse, Renaud. 1998. The European Court of Justice: The Politics of Judicial Integration. London: Macmillan
Dübber, Ulrich. 1970. Geld und Politk: Die Finanzwirtschaft der Parteien. Freudenstadt: Lutzeyer
Durr, Robert, Andrew Martin, and Christina Wolbrecht. 2000. “Ideological Divergence and Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 44:768–76
Easton, David. 1975. “A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support.” British Journal of Political Science 5:435–57
Elster, Jon, Claus Offe, and Ulrich Preuss. 1998. Institutional Design in Post-Communist Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Emnid Institut. 1992. “Einstellung zum Paragraphen 218.” Umfrage und Analyse Nr. 7/8:52–62
Emnid Institut. 1995. “Vertrauen in Institutionen.” Umfrage und Analyse Nr.1/2:72–8
Epp, Charles. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1996. “On the Struggle for Judicial Supremacy.” Law and Society Review 30 (1):87–120
Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press
Epstein, Lee, Jack Knight, and Olga Shvetsova. 2001. “The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Establishment and Maintenance of Democratic Systems of Government.” Law and Society Review 35:117–64
Fenske, Hans. 1994. Deutsche Parteiengeschichte. München: Schöningh
Ferejohn, John. 1995. “Law, Legislation, and Positive Political Theory.” In J. Banks and E. Hanushek (eds.). Modern Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Ferejohn, John, and Charles Shipan. 1990. “Congressional Influence on Bureaucracy.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 6:1–27
Ferejohn, John, and Barry Weingast. 1992. “A Positive Theory of Statutory Interpretation.” International Review of Law and Economics 12:263–79
Fisher, Louis. 1993. “The Legislative Veto: Invalidated, It Survives.” Law and Contemporary Problems 56:273–92
Frankfurter, Felix. 1924. “A Note on Advisory Opinions.” Harvard Law Review 37: 1002–9
Frankfurter, Felix. 1930. “Advisory Opinions.” In Edwin Seligman and Alvin Johnson (eds.). Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan
Franklin, Charles, and Liane C. Kosaki. 1995. “Media, Knowledge, and Public Evaluations of the Supreme Court.” In Lee J. Epstein (ed.). Contemplating Courts. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press
Friedman, Barry. 2003. “The Myths of Marbury.” Typescript. New York University School of Law
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1995. “The Politics of Legal Integration in the European Union.” International Organization 49:171–81
Garrett, Geoffrey, and Barry Weingast. 1993. “Ideas, Interests, and Institutions: Constructing the EC's Internal Market.” In Judith Goldstein and Robert Keohane (eds.). Ideas and Foreign Policy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press
Gibson, James. 1989. “Understandings of Justice: Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Political Tolerance.” Law and Society Review 23:469–96
Gibson, James. 1991. “Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Compliance with Supreme Court Decisions: A Question of Causality.” Law and Society Review 25:631–6
Gibson, James, Greg Caldeira, and Vanessa Baird. 1998. “On the Legitimacy of National High Courts.” American Political Science Review 92:343–58
Gordon, Scott. 1999. Controlling the State: Constitutionalism from Ancient Athens to Today. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Graber, Mark. 1998. “Establishing Judicial Review? Schooner Peggy and the Early Marshall Court.” Political Research Quarterly 51:221–39
Grosskopf, Anke, and Jeffrey Mondak. 1998. “Do Attitudes Toward Specific Supreme Court Decisions Matter? The Impact of Webster and Texas v. Johnson on Public Confidence in the Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly 51:633–4
Hamilton, Alexander. 1961. Federalist 78. In The Federalist Papers. New York: Mentor
Heidenheimer, Arnold. 1957. “German Party Finance: The CDU.” American Political Science Review 51:369–85
Helmke, Gretchen. 2002. “The Logic of Strategic Defection: Court–Executive Relations in Argentina under Dictatorship and Democracy.” American Political Science Review 96:291–303
Herbst. Ludolf. 1996. Option für den Westen: Vom Marshallplan bis zum deutsch-französischen Vertrag. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag
Hesse, Konrad. 1995. Grundzüge des Verfassungsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Heidelberg: C. F. Müller
Hirsch, Heidi-Karin. 1981. “Die persönlichen parlamentarischen Mitarbeiter der Bundestagsabgeordneten.” Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 81(2):203–23
Holland, Kenneth (ed.). 1991. Judicial Activism in Comparative Perspective. New York: St. Martin's Press
Howard, A. E. Dick. 1993. Constitution Making in Eastern Europe. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press
Huber, John. 1996. Rationalizing Parliament: Legislative Institutions and Party Politics in France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Institut für Staatslehre und Politik (ed.). 1952. Der Kampf um den Wehrbeitrag, Band 2. München: Isaar Verlag
Institut für Staatslehre und Politik (ed.). 1958. Der Kampf um den Wehrbeitrag Ergänzungsband. München: Isaar Verlag
Ketcham, Ralph. 1986. The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates. New York: Mentor
Key, V. O. 1961. Public Opinion and American Democracy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf
Knight, Jack, and Lee Epstein. 1996. “On the Struggle for Judicial Supremacy.” Law and Society Review 30:87–120
Kommers, Donald. 1976. Judicial Politics in West Germany. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications
Kommers, Donald. 1994. “The Federal Constitutional Court in the German Political System.” Comparative Political Studies 26:470–91
Kommers, Donald. 1997. The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany. Durham: Duke University Press
Kreps, David. 1990. Game Theory and Economic Modeling. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Küsters, H. J. (ed.). 1984. Adenauer: Teegespräche 1950–1954. Rhöndorf: Siedler Verlag
Landes, William, and Richard Posner. 1975. “The Independent Judiciary in an Interest Group Perspective.” Journal of Law and Economics 18:875–901
Landfried, Christine. 1984. Bundesverfassungsgericht und Gesetzgeber. Baden-Baden: Nomos
Landfried, Christine (ed.). 1988. Constitutional Review and Legislation. Baden-Baden: Nomos
Landfried, Christine. 1992. “Judicial Policy-Making in Germany: The Federal Constitutional Court.” West European Politics 15:50–67
Landfried, Christine. 1994. Parteifinanzen und politische Macht. Baden-Baden: Nomos
Lenz, Otto. 1989. Im Zentrum der Macht: Das Tagebuch von Staatssekretär Lenz 1951–1953. K. Gotto, H. Kleinmann, and R. Schreiner (eds.). Düsseldorf: Droste Verlag
Leuchtenburg, William. 1995. The Supreme Court Reborn: The Constitutional Revolution in the Age of Roosevelt. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Loewenberg, Gerhard. 1971. “The Influence of Parliamentary Behavior on Regime Stability.” Comparative Politics 3:177–200
Löwke, Udo. 1976. Die SPD und die Wehrfrage 1949 bis 1955. Bonn-Bad Godesberg: Verlag Neue Gesellschaft GmbH
Magalhaes, Pedro Coutinho. 2003. “The Limits to Judicialization: Legislative Politics and Constitutional Review in Iberian Democracies.” Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University
Marshall, Thomas. 1989. Public Opinion and the Supreme Court. Boston: Unwin Hyman
Martin, Lanny, and Georg Vanberg. 2004. “Policing the Bargain: Coalition Government and Parliamentary Scrutiny.” American Journal of Political Science 48:13–27
Mattli, Walter, and Anne-Marie Slaughter. 1998. “Revisiting the European Court of Justice.” International Organization 52:177–209
McCloskey, Herbert, and John Zaller. 1984. The American Ethos. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
McCloskey, Robert. 1994. The American Supreme Court. Sanford Levinson (ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press
McGuire, Kevin, and Greg Caldeira. 1993. “Lawyers, Organized Interests, and the Law of Obscenity: Agenda Setting in the Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 87:717–26
McGuire, Kevin, and James Stimson. In press. “The Least Dangerous Branch Revisited: New Evidence on Supreme Court Responsiveness to Public Preferences.” Journal of Politics
Mensing, H. P. (ed.). 1987. Adenauer: Briefe 1951–1953. Rhöndorf: Siedler Verlag
Mishler, William, and Reginald Sheehan. 1993. “The Supreme Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review 87:87–101
Mishler, William, and Reginald Sheehan. 1994. “Response to Norpoth and Segal.” American Political Science Review 88:716–24
Mondak, Jeffrey. 1991. “Substantive and Procedural Aspects of Supreme Court Decisions as Determinants of Institutional Approval.” American Politics Quarterly 19:174–88
Mondak, Jeffrey. 1992. “Institutional Legitimacy, Policy Legitimacy, and the Supreme Court.” American Politics Quarterly 20:457–77
Mondak, Jeffery, and ShannonIshiyama Smithey. 1997. “The Dynamics of Public Support for the Supreme Court.” Journal of Politics 59:1–1
Murphy, Walter. 1964. Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Murphy, Walter, and Joseph Tannenhaus. 1990. “Publicity, Public Opinion, and the Court.” Northwestern University Law Review 84:985–1023
Nassmacher, Karl-Heinz. 1989. “Structure and Impact of Public Subsidies to Political Parties in Europe: The Examples of Austria, Italy, Sweden, and West Germany.” In H. Alexander (ed.). Comparative Political Finance in the 1980s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth, and Renate Köcher. 1997. Allensbacher Jahrbuch der Demoskopie 1993–1997. München: KG Saur Muenchen
Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth, and Renate Köcher. 2002. Allensbacher Jahrbuch der Demoskopie 1998–2002. München: KG Saur Muenchen
Noelle, Elisabeth, and Erich Peter Neumann. 1974. Jahrbuch der Öffentlichen Meinung. Bonn: Verlag für Demoskopie
Norpoth, Helmut, and Jeffrey Segal. 1994. “Popular Influence on Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review 88:711–16
Note. 1956. “Advisory Opinions on the Constitutionality of Statutes.” Harvard Law Review 69:1–3
Orkeny, Antal, and Kim Lane Scheppele. 1996. “Rules of Law: The Complexity of Legality in Hungary.” International Journal of Sociology 26:76–94
Page, Benjamin, Robert Shapiro, and Glenn Dempsey. 1987. “What Moves Public Opinion.” American Political Science Review 81:23–44
Perry, H. W. 1991. Deciding to Decide: Agenda Setting on the U.S. Supreme Court. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Pinto-Duschinsky. 1991. “The Party Foundations and Political Finance in Germany.” In L. Seidle (ed.). Comparative Issues in Party and Election Finance. Volume 4 of the Research Studies. Royal Commission on Electoral Reform and Party Financing. Toronto: Dunburn Press
Powell, G. Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press
Pritchett, C. Herman. 1977. The American Constitution, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill
Ramseyer, Mark. 1994. “The Puzzling (In)dependence of Courts: A Comparative Approach.” Journal of Legal Studies 23:721–47
Riker, William, and Barry Weingast. 1988. “Constitutional Regulation of Legislative Choice: The Political Consequences of Judicial Deference to Legislatures.” Virginia Law Review 74:373–401
Rogers, James. 2001. “Information and Judicial Review: A Signaling Game of Legislative–Judicial Interaction.” American Journal of Political Science 45:84–99
Rogers, James, and Georg Vanberg. 2002. “Judicial Advisory Opinions and Legislative Outcomes in Comparative Perspective.” American Journal of Political Science 46:379–97
Rosenberg, Gerald. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Rubinstein, Ariel. 1991. “Comments on the Interpretation of Game Theory.” Econometrica 59:909–24
Rudzio, Wolfgang. 1994. “Das neue Parteienfinanzierungsmodell und seine Auswirkungen.” Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 3:390–401
Schindler, Peter. 1994. Datenhandbuch zur Geschichte des Deutschen Bundestages, 1983–1991. Baden-Baden: Nomos
Schlaich, Klaus. 1994. Das Bundesverfassungsgericht: Stellung, Verfahren, Entscheidungen. München: C. H. Beck
Schleth, Uwe. 1971. “Analyse der Rechenschaftsberichte der Parteien für 1968.” Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 1:139–53
Schneider, Hans-Peter. 1989. “The New German System of Party Funding: The Presidential Committee Report of 1983 and Its Realization.” In H. Alexander (ed.). Comparative Political Finance in the 1980s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Schwartz, Herman. 2000. The Struggle for Constitutional Justice in Post-Communist Eastern Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Schwarz, Hans Peter. 1981. Die Ära Adenauer: Gründerjahre der Republik 1949–1957. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt
Segal, Jeffrey. 1997. “Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts.” American Political Science Review 91:28–44
Segal, Jeffrey, and Harold Spaeth. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Shapiro, Martin. 1981. Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Shapiro, Martin, and Alec Stone (eds.). 1994. Special Issue: The New Constitutional Politics of Europe. Comparative Political Studies 26
Shapiro, Martin, and Alec Stone Sweet. 2002. On Law, Politics, and Judicialization. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Shipan, Charles. 2000. “The Legislative Design of Judicial Review: A Formal Analysis.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 12: 269–304
Smith, Jean Edward. 1996. John Marshall: Definer of a Nation. New York: Henry Holt
Solzhenitsyn, Aleksandr. 1997. “What Kind of Democracy Is This?” New York Times, January 4, 1997:23
Sontheimer, Kurt. 1991. Die Adenauer Ära: Grundlegung der Bundesrepublik. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag
Spriggs, James. 1997. “Explaining Federal Bureaucratic Compliance with Supreme Court Opinions.” Political Research Quarterly 50:567–93
Spriggs, James, and Paul Wahlbeck. 1997. “Amicus Curiae and the Role of Information at the Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly 50:365–86
Staton, Jeffrey. 2003. “Public Support and Spin: Judicial Policy Implementation in Mexico City and Merida.” Manuscript, New York University
Stephenson, Matthew. 2003. “When the Devil Turns: The Political Foundations of Independent Judicial Review.” Journal of Legal Studies 32:59–90
Stone Sweet, Alec, and Thomas Brunell. 1998. “Constructing a Supranational Constitution: Dispute Resolution and Governance in the European Community.” American Political Science Review 92:63–80
Stone, Alec. 1992. The Birth of Judicial Politics in France. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Stone Sweet, Alec. 1998. “Rules, Dispute Resolution, and Strategic Behavior. Comment on Vanberg.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 10:327–38
Stone Sweet, Alec. 2000. Governing with Judges. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Sunstein, Cass. 1991. “Constitutionalism, Prosperity, Democracy.” Constitutional Political Economy 2:371–94
Tate, C. Neal, and Torbjoern Vallinder. 1995. The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York: New York University Press
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1835/1988. Democracy in America. New York: Harper Perennial
Trochev, Alexei. 2002. “Implementing Russian Constitutional Court Decisions.” East European Constitutional Review 11:95–103
Tyler, Tom, and Kenneth Rasinski. 1991. “Legitimacy and the Acceptance of Unpopular U.S. Supreme Court Decisions: A Reply to Gibson.” Law and Society Review 25:621–30
Vanberg, Georg. 1998a. “Abstract Judicial Review, Legislative Bargaining, and Policy Compromise.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 10:299–326
Vanberg, Georg. 1998b. “Reply to Stone Sweet.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 10:339–46
Vanberg, Georg. 2000. “Establishing Judicial Independence in West Germany: The Impact of Opinion Leadership and the Separation of Powers.” Comparative Politics 32:333–53
Vanberg, Georg. 2001. “Legislative–Judicial Relations: A Game-Theoretic Approach to Constitutional Review.” American Journal of Political Science 45:346–61
Volcansek, Mary. 2000. Constitutional Politics in Italy. New York: St. Martin's Press
Volcansek, Mary. 1991. “Judicial Activism in Italy.” In K. Holland (ed.). Judicial Activism in Comparative Perspective. New York: St. Martin's Press
Weber Fas, Rudolf. 2002. Der Verfassungsstaat des Grundgesetzes. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck
Weingast, Barry. 1997. “The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law.” American Political Science Review 91:245–63
Wengst, Udo. 1984. Staatsaufbau und Regierungspraxis 1948–1953: Zur Geschichte der Verfassungsorgane der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Düsseldorf: Droste
White, G. Edward. 2000. The Constitution and the New Deal. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Whittington, Keith. 2003. “Legislative Sanctions and the Strategic Environment of Judicial Review.” I-Con: The International Journal of Constitutional Law 1:446–74
Widner, Jennifer. 2001. Building the Rule of Law: Francis Nyalali and the Road to Judicial Independence in Africa. New York: W. W. Norton
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origin of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press