This is the first comparative-historical study of welfare states (social policies) in the former communist region of East Central Europe. Inglot analyzes almost one hundred years of expansion of social insurance programs across different political regimes. He places these programs in a larger political and socioeconomic context, which includes the most recent developments since the advent of democracy. Based on this research, he argues that despite apparent similarities the welfare states of East Central Europe, Czechoslovakia (Czech Republic and Slovakia since 1993), Poland, and Hungary have pursued distinct historical paths of development and change. He examines the highly unusual evolution of these welfare states in detail, tracing alternating periods of growth and retrenchment/reform, which he links to political and economic crises under communist rule. Inglot uses this comparative analysis of welfare systems to examine the continued influence of history over the politics and policies of the social safety nets in Eastern Europe.
“This is a remarkably careful, yet ambitious study of welfare states in east-central Europe--from their imperial founding through the inter-war period and communism up to the admission of Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic and Slovakia to the European Union. Inglot makes a very persuasive case for both the cyclical nature of welfare state development in these countries and the power of history to over-ride not just the repeated changes in regimes and states so characteristic of this region, but also the homogenizing pressures of the communist experience.”
-Valerie Bunce, Cornell University
“No other topic has generated as many controversies and misunderstandings as the welfare state reforms in postcommunist Europe. Tomasz Inglot provides a richly documented, balanced, and theoretically compelling account of these reforms and their historical antecedents. He has brilliantly captured the problems and dynamics of welfare state transformations and their historical trajectories across the region, dispelling many persistent myths in the process. This is essential reading for all who strive to understand the nature and outcomes of postcommunist transformations. Inglot’s book represents comparative politics at its best and makes a significant contribution to ongoing debates on welfare states and social policies.”
-Grzegorz Ekiert, Harvard University
“By deftly recounting the creation and evolution of welfare states in east central Europe from the end of WW I to the recent expansion of the European Union, Inglot makes a valuable contribution to the burgeoning literature on social policy reform. His work stands apart as one of the few cross-national historical studies of the welfare state in a largely non-democratic setting. Inglot analyzes the political struggles and periodic crises of welfare policy in the inter-war and communist periods and traces their lasting impact on social policy reforms in the postcommunist era. This work reminds us of the persistence of institutional and policy legacies even in the face of massive political change.”
-Timothy Frye, Columbia University
“In an account rich with historical nuance, Inglot traces the development of the welfare state in East Central Europe. This is an important and welcome study of a much-neglected topic.”
-Anna Grzymala-Busse, University of Michigan
"Welfare States in East Central Europe is ambitious, conceptually innovative, and largely successful in providing an original and convincing historical-institutional account. It "brings history back in," reinterpreting the development of ECE welfare states across different political regimes and integrating them into the comparative literature on welfare expansion and retrenchment, as well as on broader institutionalist theory. It adds greatly to our knowledge about their early development and engages contemporary debates about the extent and determinants of post-communist reform. The book will be of great value to scholars who share these interests."
Perspectives on Politics, Linda J. Cook, Brown University
Co-winner, 2009 AAASS/Orbis Books Prize for Polish Studies
Amenta, Edwin. 2003. “What We Know about the Development of Social Policy: Comparative and Historical Research in Comparative and Historical Perspective.” In James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, eds., Comparative Historical Analysis in Social Sciences, 91–130. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Antal, Kálmánné, Janos Réri, Ádám Résmovits, and Milós Toldi. 1995. “Pension Outlays and Changes in the Pension System in the Nineties.” In Péter Bod, ed., Human Resources and Social Stability During Transition in Hungary, 200–215. Budapest: Institute for World Economics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences; San Francisco, Calif.: International Center for Economic Growth.
Augusztinovics, Mária, et al. 2002. “The Hungarian Pension System before and after the 1998 Reform.” In Elaine Fultz, ed., Pension Reform in Central and Eastern Europe, 25–93. Budapest: International Labour Office/Central and Eastern European Team.
Balcerowicz, Leszek. 1995. “Understanding Postcommunist Transitions.” In Larry Diamond and Marc F. Plattner, eds., Economic Reform and Democracy, 86–100. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Balcerzak-Paradowska, Bożena. 1986. Dynamika i struktura urlopów oraz zasiłków wychowawczych w latach 1981–1985. Postawy młodych rodzin wobec tych świadczeń. Warsaw: Instytut Pracy i Spraw Socjalnych (no. 11/May).
Bernaś, Bogumił. 1982. “Osiągnięcia i problemy polityki społecznej Czechosłowacji.” Prace Naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu (internal publication of the Academy of Economics in Wrocław, Poland), no. 222: 115–138.
Bober, Tomasz. 1986 . “Sytuacja finansowo-majątkowa ubezpieczeń społecznych w Polsce w okresie okupacji.” Studia i Materiały z Historii Ubezpieczeń Społecznych w Polsce, no. 4: 111–156. Warsaw: Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych (ZUS).
Bod, Péter. 1994. “For the Pension System and Reform (Chapter IV).” In Hungary's Welfare State in Transition: Structure, Initial Reforms and Recommendations. Policy Study no. 3. Budapest: The Joint Hungarian International Blue Ribbon Commission/Hudson Institute (February).
Bod, Péter, ed. 1995. Human Resources and Social Stability during Transition in Hungary. Budapest: Institute for World Economics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences; San Francisco, Calif.: International Center for Economic Growth.
Borowczyk, Ewa. 1991. “Organizacja ubezpieczeń społecznych” (po drugiej wojnie światowej). In Czesław Jackowiak, ed., Rozwój Ubezpieczeń Społecznych w Polsce, 239–254. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.
Bruszt, Laszlo, and David Stark. 1991. “Remaking the Political Field in Hungary: From the Politics of Confrontation to the Politics of Competition.” In Ivo Banac, ed., Eastern Europe in Revolution. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1991.
Cain, Michael J. G., and Aleksander Surdej. 1999. “Transitional Politics or Public Choice? Evaluating Stalled Pension Reforms in Poland.” In Linda Cook, Mitchell A. Orenstein, and Marilyn Rueschemeyer, eds., Left Parties and Social Policy in Postcommunist Europe, 145–174. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
Cain, Michael J. G., Nida Gelazis, and Tomasz Inglot, eds. 2005. Fighting Poverty and Reforming Social Security: What Can Post-Soviet States Learn from the New Democracies of Central Europe? (Conference proceedings). Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars (East European Studies).
Carey, Nick. 2003. “Czech: Government Finally Opens a Door to Pension Reform Debate.” Prague Business Journal, June 30. Http://www.globalaging.org/pension/world/unmentionable.htm, accessed 5 September 2004.
Chłoń-Domińczak, Agnieszka. 2002. “The Polish Pension Reform of 1999.” In Elaine Fultz, ed., Pension Reform in Central and Eastern Europe, vol. 1: Restructuring with Privatization: Case Studies of Hungary and Poland. Budapest: International Labour Organization.
Clayton, Richard, and Jonas Pontusson. 1998. “Welfare State Retrenchment Revisited: Entitlement Cuts, Public Sector Restructuring, and Inegalitarian Trends in Advanced Capitalist Societies.” World Politics 51 (October): 67–98.
De Deken, Johan Jeroen. 1994. “Social Policy in Postwar Czechoslovakia: The Development of Old-Age Pensions and Housing Policies during the Period 1945–1989.” EUI Working Paper SPS no. 94/13. Florence: European University Institute.
Dzienio, Kazimierz. 1976. “Procesy demograficzne w europejskich krajach socjalistycznych.” In Danuta Graniewska, ed., Socjalne i prawne środki ochrony macierzyństwa i rodziny. Warsaw: Książka i Wiedza.
Featherstone Kevin, Georgios Kazamias, and Dimitras Papadimitriou. 2001. “The Limits of External Empowerment: EMU, Technocracy and the Reform of the Greek Pension System.” Political Studies 3 (August): 462–480.
Fultz, Elaine. ed. 2002. Pension Reform in Central and Eastern Europe, vol. 1: Restructuring with Privatization: Case Studies of Hungary and Poland, and vol. 2: Restructuring of Public Pension Schemes: Case Studies of the Czech Republic and Slovenia. Budapest: International Labour Office/Central and Eastern European Team.
Góralska, Helena, and Aleksandra Wiktorow. 1988. “System ubezpieczeń społecznych i świadczeń socjalnych w krajach RWPG.” In Michał Winiewski, ed., Ubezpieczenia społeczne i świadczenia socjalne (no. 2, vol. 1), 82–210. Warsaw: Instytut Pracy i Spraw Socjalnych/Towarzystwo Wolnej Wszechnicy Polskiej.
Gruber, Joseph. 1924. “Progress and Tendencies of Czechoslovak Social Policy.” In Social Institute of the Czechoslovak Republic for the International Congress of Social Policy in Prague, Social Policy in the Czechoslovak Republic. Prague: Orbis.
Halbersztadt, Jerzy. 1992. “Aleksander Prystor, premier Rzeczypospolitej 27 V 1931–9 VI 1933.” In Andrzej Chojnowski and Piotr Wróbel, eds., Prezydenci i premierzy Drugiej Rzeczpospolitej. Wrocław: Ossolineum.
Hancock, Ruth, and Stephen Pudney. 1996. State Pensions and the Welfare of Pensioners during Economic Transition: An Analysis of Hungarian Survey Data. Leicester: University of Leicester, Faculty of Social Sciences.
Held, Joseph, and Peter Hanak. 1992. “Hungary on a Fixed Course: An Outline of Hungarian History.” In Joseph Held, ed., The Columbia History of Eastern Europe in the Twentieth Century. New York: Columbia University Press.
“IMF Concludes Article IV Consultation with Hungary.” 2000. International Monetary Fund, Public Information Notice (PIN) no. 00/23, March 17. Www.imf.org/external/np/sec/pn/2000/pn0023, accessed 29 March 2004.
Inglot, Tomasz. 1994. “The Communist Legacy and Post-Communist Politics of Welfare: The Origins, Evolution, and Transformation of Social Policy in Poland from the 1920s to 1993.” Ph.D. diss., University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Inglot, Tomasz. 1995. “The Politics of Social Policy Reform in Post-Communist Poland: Government Responses to the Social Insurance Crisis during 1989–1993.” Communist and Postcommunist Studies 3 (September): 361–373.
Jakoby, Marek. 2002. “The Pension System in the Slovak Republic at the Threshold of Reform.” Paper presented at the Conference on Practical Lessons in Pension Reform: Sharing the Experiences of Transition and OECD Countries. The Ministry of Labor and Social Policy, Warsaw, 27–28 May.
Janko, Jaroslav. 1924. “Unemployment in Czechoslovakia.” In Social Institute of the Czechoslovak Republic for the International Congress of Social Policy in Prague, Social Policy in the Czechoslovak Republic. Prague: Orbis.
Král, Jiří. 2002. “The Role of Private Pensions in the Czech Republic.” Paper presented at the international conference, “Practical Lessons of Pension Reform: Sharing the Experiences of Transition and OECD Countries.” Warsaw, 27–28 May.
Kramer, Mark. 1997. “Social Protection Policies and Safety Nets in East-Central Europe: Dilemmas of the Postcommunist Transformation.” In Ethan B. Kapstein and Michael Mandelbaum, eds., Sustaining the Transition: The Social Safety Net in Postcommunist Europe, 46–123. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.
Kühner, Stefan. 2007. “Country-Level Comparisons of Welfare State Change Measures: Another Facet of the Dependent Variable Problem within the Comparative Analysis of the Welfare State?” Journal of European Social Policy 17, no. 1: 5–18.
Linden, Ronald H., ed. 2002. Norms and Nannies: The Impact of International Organizations on the Central and East European States. Lanham, Md., Boulder, Colo., New York, and Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
Lipsmeyer, Christine. 2002. “Parties and Policy: Evaluating Political Party Influences on Welfare Policy Spending during the Post-Communist Transition.” British Journal of Political Science 32, no. 4: 641–661.
Mácha, Martin. 2002. “The Political Economy of Pension Reform in the Czech Republic.” In Elaine Fultz, ed., Pension Reform in Eastern and Central Europe, vol. 2, Restructuring of Public Pension Schemes: Case Studies of the Czech Republic and Slovenia. Budapest: ILO, Central European Team.
Matits, Agnes. 2002. “Some Practical Issues in the Hungarian Pension Reform.” Paper presented at the international conference, “Practical Lessons in Pension Reform: Sharing the Experiences of Transition and OECD Countries.” Warsaw, 27–28 May.
Minkoff, Jack, and Lynn Turgeon. 1977. “Income Maintenance in the Soviet Union in Eastern and Western Perspective.” In Irving Louis Horowitz, ed., Equity, Income, and Policy: Comparative Studies in Three Worlds of Development, 176–211. New York and London: Praeger.
Müller, Katharina. 2002. “Introduction: Explaining Pension Reform.” In Elainé Fultz, ed., Pension Reform in Central and Eastern Europe, vol. 2: Restructuring the Public Pension Schemes: Case Studies of the Czech Republic and Slovakia, 11–17.
Nagy, Tibor. 1986. “Hungarian Social Insurance Contributions as State Taxes.” Legal Development and Comparative Law: Selected Essays from the 12th International Conference of Tax Professionals, 299–330.
Orenstein, Mitchell. 2000. “How Politics and Institutions Affect Pension Reform in Three Postcommunist Countries.” Policy Research Working Paper 2310, Washington, D.C.: World Bank Development Research Group, Poverty and Human Resources (March).
Orenstein, Mitchell S., and Martine R. Haas. 2005. “Globalization and the Development of Welfare States in Central and Eastern Europe.” In Miguel Glatzer, and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, eds., Globalization and the Future of the Welfare State (Pittsburgh Pa.: Pittsburgh University Press).
Palacios, Robert and Roberto Rocha. 1998. “The Hungarian Pension System in Transition.” In Lajos Bokros, and Jean-Jacques Dethier, eds., Public Finance Reform during the Transition: The Experience of Hungary. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Pasternak, Józef. 1946. . “Odbudowa ubezpieczeń społecznych po wojnie (1945–1946).” Lecture delivered at the First Meeting of the Temporary Social Insurance Councils on April 8, 1946. Studia i Materiały z Historii Ubezpieczeń Społecznych w Polsce, no. 7, Warsaw: Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych (ZUS).
Pierson, Paul D., and R. Kent Weaver. 1993. Imposing Losses in Pension Policy. In R. Kent Weaver, and Bert A. Rockman, eds., Do Institutions Matter? Government Capabilities in the United States and Abroad. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
Prasznic, Urszula. 1995. “Ewolucja podstawowych funkcji systemu zabezpieczenia społecznego rolników.” (VII Konferencja Polskiego Stowarzyszenia Ubezpieczenia Społecznego). Materiały Informacyjne ZUS 8 (August): 10–17.
“Przemówienie Ministra Pracy i Opieki Społecznej Pana D-ra Stanislawa Jurkiewicza w sprawie projektu ustawy o ubezpieczeniu społecznem (wygłoszone w Sejmie 4 marca, 1929 roku).” 1929. Praca i Opieka Społeczna 1: 25–28.
Sipos, Sandor, and István György Toth. 1998. “Poverty Alleviation: Social Assistance and Family Benefits.” In Lajos Bokros, and Jean-Jacques Dethier, eds., Public Finance Reform during the Transition: The Experience of Hungary, 287–316. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Sissenich, Beate. 2002. “The Diffussion of EU Social and Employment Legislation in Poland and Hungary.” In Ronald H. Linden, ed., Norms and Nannies: The Impact of International Organizations on the Central and East European States, 287–315. Lanham, Md., Boulder, Colo., New York, and Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
Skocpol, Theda. 1985. “Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research.” In Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol, eds. Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Staszewska, Dorota. 1990. Ekonomiczne aspekty nowej koncepcji polityki rodzinnej w Czechosłowacji. IPiSS no. 1/34 (materiały zza granicy). Warsaw: Institute of Labor and Social Policy (Reports from Abroad).
Stern, E. 1924. Czechoslovakia and the International Labour Organization. In Social Institute of the Czechoslovak Republic for the International Congress of Social Policy in Prague, Social Policy in the Czechoslovak Republic. Prague: Orbis.
Stevens, John N. 1985. Czechoslovakia at the Crossroads: The Economic Dilemmas of Communism in Postwar Czechoslovakia. Boulder, Colo.: East European Monographs, distributed by Columbia University Press.
Szelenyi, Ivan, and Robert Manchin. 1987. “Social Policy under State Socialism: Market Redistribution and Social Inequalities in East European Socialist Societies.” In Martin Rein, Gøsta Esping-Anderson, and Lee Rainwater, eds., Stagnation and Renewal in Social Policy: The Rise and Fall of Policy Regimes. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
Weir, Margaret. 1992. “Ideas and Politics of Bounded Innovation.” In Sven Steinmo et al., eds., Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, 188–216. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Winter, Lev. 1924. “Social Insurance.” In Social Policy in the Czechoslovak Republic. (Social Institute of the Czechoslovak Republic for the International Congress of Social Policy in Prague), 147–161. Prague: Orbis.
Dane porównawcze z dziedziny polityki społecznej. 1975, 1979, 1982, 1985, 1990, 1991 (comparative economic statistics on social policy from COMECON countries, classified publications for internal government use only). Warsaw: Institute of Labor and Social Policy.
Duchodová Reforma IV (Pension Reform in the Czech Republic). A dalsi materialy souvisejici s problematikou duchodoveho systemu (and other documents relevant for the pension system). 2001 (CD-Rom). Prague: Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs.
Hungarian Welfare State in Transition: Structure, Initial Reforms and Recommendations. Policy Study no. 3. 1994. Budapest: Joint Hungarian-International Blue Ribbon Commission/Hudson Institute (February).
“Najnowsza ustawa o świadczeniach rodzinnych” (Ustawa z dn.28 listopada 2003r. o świadczeniach rodzinnych). 2003. Rzeczpospolita, 28 November. Www.rzeczpospolita.pl/prawo/doc/rod2255.html, accessed 27 January 2004.
Nowy system emerytalny w Polsce. Pytania i odpowiedzi (The new pension system in Poland. Questions and answers). 1998. Warsaw: Biuro Pełnomocnika Rządu do Spraw Reformy Zabezpieczenia Społecznego (May).
Opinie do senackiego projektu inicjatywy ustawodawczej o ubezpieczeniach społecznych (MPiPS, MF, ZUS) (Comments on the Senate legislative proposal on the reform of social insurance: Ministry of Labor and Social Policy, Ministry of Finance, Social Insurance Institution). 1992. Warsaw: Biuro Studiow i Analiz Kancelarii Senatu, October. (Manuscript for internal use.)
Protokóły ze spotkań Ministerstwa Pracy i Opieki Społecznej, zwiazków zawodowych i funckjonariuszy Komitetut Centralnego PZPR (Protocols from the meetings between the Ministry of Labor and Social Welfare, Trade Union officials, and the functionaries of the Party Secretariat). 1958–1960. Archiwum Akt Nowych. Warsaw, 237/xviii.
Rashid, Mansoora 1992. Finansowanie polskiego systemu ubezpieczeń społecznych. Model symulacyjny i wyniki dwóch eksperymentów (Financing of the Polish system of social security. Model symulation, draft for limited distribution only, EC1/2HR). Warsaw Ministry of Labor and Social Policy/World Bank, February.
Zakres i funkcjonowanie opieki społecznej (The scope and function of social welfare activity, a document from the archives of the Polish United Workers Party, Central Committee, Social and Labor Section). 1949. Archiwum Akt Nowych. Warsaw, 237/xxviii-2, 1–10.
Boni, Michał. Deputy Minister for Unemployment Affairs, Minister of Labor and Social Policy (December 1990–October 1991). Since mid-1990, director of the Institute of Public Affairs (Instytut Spraw Publicznych). Warsaw, 16 February 1993 and 4 January 1997.
Gorywoda, Manfred. Deputy director, Economic Department, Central Committee (CC), Polish United Workers Party (PUWP), February 1977–February 1980; Director of the Department of Planning and Economic Analysis CC, February 1980–July 1982; director of the group of economic advisers, Council of Ministers, June 1982–February 1984; Economic Secretary CC, November 1983–October 1987; Deputy Prime Minister, November 1987–January 1990; first secretary of the regional PUWP in Katowice. Warsaw, 23 March 1993.
Tomeš, Igor. Department of Social Insurance, Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs, 1989–1991; in the late 1960s, World Bank expert, ILO expert, professor of social policy at Charles University in Prague. Prague, 8 June 2002.
Višek, Pétr. Director of Socioklub, social policy expert in the Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs, Director of Social Policy Department at MLSA 1990–1992, deputy director in charge of family policy before 1989. Prague, 10 June 2002.
Zajchowski, Józef. Director at the Institute for Central Planning, Central Committee PUWP, Economic Department, 1974–1980; adviser to Prime Minister Wojciech Jaruzelski 1983, 1984–1989; deputy director in the Central Planning Commission, from 1989 at the Central Statistical Office. Warsaw, 15 March 1993.