Philosophical Perspectives on Infinity


Philosophical Perspectives on Infinity

This book is an exploration of philosophical questions about infinity. Graham Oppy examines how the infinite lurks everywhere, both in science and in our ordinary thoughts about the world. He also analyses the many puzzles and paradoxes that follow in the train of the infinite. Even simple notions, such as counting, adding and maximising present serious difficulties. Other topics examined include the nature of space and time, infinities in physical science, infinities in theories of probability and decision, the nature of part/whole relations, mathematical theories of the infinite, and infinite regression and principles of sufficient reason.


 Reviews:

"I did encounter some new and provocative examples beyond the standard fare of Zeno's paradox and Hilbert's Hotel, and the meticulous framing of each conundrum and possible resolutions was fascinating and worth the effort." - MAA Review Bonnie Shulman, Bates College

"...read this book." Mathematical Reviews

Abian, A. 1978. “Passages between Finite and Infinite.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 19:452–6.
Allis, V., and T. Koetsier. 1991. “On Some Paradoxes of the Infinite.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 42:187–94.
Allis, V., and T. Koetsier. 1995. “On Some Paradoxes of the Infinite II.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 46:235–47.
Almog, J. 1999. “Nothing, Something, Infinity.” Journal of Philosophy 96:462–78.
Alper, J., and M. Bridger. 1997. “Mathematics, Model and Zeno's Paradoxes.” Synthese 110:143–66.
Angel, L. 2002. “Zeno's Arrow, Newton's Mechanics, and Bell's Inequalities.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53:161–82.
Arntzenius, F., and D. McCarthy. 1997. “The Two Envelope Paradox and Infinite Expectations.” Analysis 57:42–50.
Arsenijivic, M. 1989. “How Many Physically Distinguished Parts Can a Limited Body Contain?” Analysis 49:36–42.
Baker, G., and P. Hacker. 1984. Language, Sense and Nonsense. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bell, J. 1979. “The Infinite Past Regained: A Reply to Whitrow.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30:161–5.
Bell, J. 1988. “Infinitesimals.” Synthese 75:285–315.
Belot, G. 2001. “The Principle of Sufficient Reason.” Journal of Philosophy 98:55–74.
Benacerraf, P. 1962. “Tasks, Supertasks, and the Modern Eleatics.” Journal of Philosophy 59:765–84.
Benacerraf, P. 1965. “What Numbers Could Not Be.” Philosophical Review 74:47–73.
Benacerraf, P. 1985. “Skolem and the Sceptic.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supp. vol. 59:85–115.
Benardete, J. 1964. Infinity: An Essay in Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon.
Bennett, J. 1971. “The Age and Size of the World.” Synthese 23:127–46.
Berresford, G. 1981. “A Note on Thomson's Lamp ‘Paradox.’” Analysis 41:1–3.
Black, M. 1951. “Achilles and the Tortoise.” Analysis 11:91–101.
Blake, R. 1926. “The Paradox of Temporal Process.” Journal of Philosophy 23:645–54.
Blum, R., and J. Rosenblatt. 1972. Probability and Statistics. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
Boolos, G., and R. Jeffrey. 1980. Computability and Logic, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bostock, D. 1972/3. “Aristotle, Zeno, and the Potential Infinite.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 73:37–5.
Brook, P. 1965. “White at the Shooting Gallery.” Mind 74:256.
Broome, J. 1995. “The Two-Envelope Paradox.” Analysis 55:6–11.
Brown, P. 1965. “A Medieval Analysis of Infinity.” Journal for the History of Philosophy 3:242–3.
Cain, J. 1995. “Infinite Utility.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73:401–4.
Cajori, F. 1915. “The History of Zeno's Arguments on Motion.” American Mathematical Monthly 22:1–7, 39–47, 77–83, 109–15, 143–9, 179–86, 215–21, 253–8, 292–7.
Cargile, J. 1992. “On a Problem about Probability and Decision.” Analysis 52:211–16.
Carnap, R. 1956. “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology.” In Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic, (2nd ed., enlarged.) Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Castell, P., and D. Batens. 1994. “The Two Envelope Paradox: The Infinite Case.” Analysis 54:46–9.
Chad, A. 1997. “The Principle of Sufficient Reason and the Uncaused Beginning of the Universe.” Dialogue 36:555–62.
Chalmers, D. 2002. “The St. Petersburg Two Envelope Paradox.” Analysis 62:155–7.
Champlin, T. 1988. Reflexive Paradoxes. London: Routledge.
Chase, J. 2002. “The Non-Probabilistic Two Envelope Paradox.” Analysis 62:157–60.
Chihara, C. 1965. “On the Possibility of Completing an Infinite Process.” Philosophical Review 74:74–87.
Christensen, R., and J. Utts. 1992. “Bayesian Resolution of the ‘Exchange Paradox.’” American Statistician 46:274–6.
Clark, M., and N. Schackel. 2000. “The Two Envelope Paradox.” Mind 109:415–42.
Clark, P., and S. Read. 1984. “Hypertasks.” Synthese 61:387–90.
Clark, R. 1988. “Vicious Infinite Regress Arguments.” In J. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 2: Epistemology. Atascadero, Calif.: Ridgeview, 369–80.
Clayton, P. 1996. “The Theistic Argument from Infinity in Early Modern Philosophy.” International Philosophical Quarterly 36:5–17.
Cleve, J. 1971. “Cauchy, Convergence and Continuity.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 22:27–37.
Cohen, R., and L. Lauden, eds. 1983. Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Conway, D. 1974. “Possibility and Infinite Time: A Logical Paradox in St. Thomas' Third Way.” International Philosophical Quarterly 14:201–8.
Conway, D. 1983. “Concerning Infinite Chains, Infinite Trains, and Borrowing a Typewriter.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 14:71–86.
Conway, D. 1984. “‘It Would Have Happened Already’: On One Argument for a First Cause.” Analysis 44:159–66.
Conway, J. 1976. On Numbers and Games. London: Academic.
Corbett, S. 1988. “Zeno's Achilles: A Reply to John McKie.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49:325–31.
Cornman, J., and K. Lehrer. 1968. Philosophical Problems and Arguments: An Introduction. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Cowen, T., and J. High. 1988. “Time, Bounded Utility, and the St. Petersburg Paradox.” Theory and Decision 25:219–23.
Craig, W. 1979a. The Kalām Cosmological Argument. London: Macmillan.
Craig, W. 1979b. “Whitrow, Popper, and the Impossibility of an Infinite Past.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30:166–70.
Craig, W. 1985. “Professor Mackie and the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” Religious Studies 20:367–75.
Craig, W. 1988. “Quentin Smith on Infinity and the Past.” Philosophy of Science 55:453–5.
Craig, W. 1991a. “Time and Infinity.” International Philosophical Quarterly 31:387–401.
Craig, W. 1991b. “Theism and Big Bang Cosmology.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69:492–503.
Craig, W. 1993. “Graham Oppy on the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” Sophia 32:1–11.
Craig, W., and Q. Smith. 1993. Theism, Atheism and Big Bang Cosmology. Oxford: Clarendon.
Cutland, N. et al. 1988. “On Cauchy's Notion of Infinitesimal.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 39:375–8.
Dauben, J. 1977. “Georg Cantor and Pope Leo XIII: Mathematics, Theology, and the Infinite.” Journal of the History of Ideas 38:85–108.
Dauben, J. 1990. Georg Cantor: His Mathematics and Philosophy of the Infinite. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Davis, M. 1977. Applied Non-Standard Analysis. New York: John Wiley.
Day, T. 1987a. “Aquinas on Infinite Regress.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 22:151–64.
Day, T. 1987b. “Infinite Regress Arguments.” Philosophical Papers 16:155–64.
Detlefsen, M. 1986. Hilbert's Program: An Essay on Mathematical Instrumentalism. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Devlin, K. 1991. The Joy of Sets. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Diamond, P. 1965. “The Evaluation of Infinite Utility Streams.” Econometrica 33:170–7.
Diamond, R. 1964. “Resolution of the Paradox of Tristram Shandy.” Philosophy of Science 31:55–8.
Drake, F. 1974. Set Theory: An Introduction to Large Cardinals. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Dreier, J. 2003. “Boundless Good.” Unpublished ms.
Dretske, F. 1965. “Counting to Infinity.” Analysis 25:99–101.
Earman, J. 1975. “Infinities, Infinitesimals, and Indivisibles: The Leibnizian Labyrinth.” Studia Logica 7:236–51.
Earman, J. 1995. Bangs, Crunches, Whimpers and Shrieks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Earman, J., and J. Norton. 1993. “Forever Is a Day: Supertasks in Pitowsky and Malament-Hogarth Spacetimes.” Philosophy of Science 60:22–42.
Earman, J., and J. Norton. 1996. “Infinite Pains: The Trouble with Supertasks.” In A. Morton and S. Stich (eds.), Benacerraf and His Critics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Eells, E. 1988. “Quentin Smith on Infinity and the Past.” Philosophy of Science 55:453–5.
Ehrlich, P. 1982. “Negative, Infinite and Hotter Than Infinite Temperatures.” Synthese. 50:233–77.
Ehrlich, P. 1994. Real Numbers, Generalisations of the Real, and Theories of Continua. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Ehrlich, P. 1997. “From Completeness to Archimedean Completeness.” Synthese 110:57–76.
Evans, G. 1978. “Can There Be Vague Objects?” Analysis 38:208.
Faris, J. 1996. The Paradoxes of Zeno. Gateshead: Athenaeum.
Feferman, S. 1989. “Infinity in Mathematics: Is Cantor Necessary?” Philosophical Topics 17:23–45.
Fenstad, J. 1985. “Is Non-Standard Analysis Relevant for the Philosophy of Mathematics?” Synthese 62:289–301.
Fetzer, J. (ed.) 1984. Principles of Philosophical Reasoning. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Allanheld.
Fishburn, P. 1972. Mathematics of Decision Theory. Paris: Mouton.
Fitch, F. 1955. “A Logical Analysis of Some Value Concepts.” Journal of Symbolic Logic 28:135–42.
Forrest, P. 1996. “How Innocent Is Mereology?” Analysis 56:127–31.
Fraenkel, A., Y. Bar-Hillel, and A. Levy. 1973. Foundations of Set Theory. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Gale, R., and A. Pruss. 1999. “A New Cosmological Argument.” Religious Studies 35:461–76.
Gamow, G. 1946. 1, 2, 3, … Infinity. London: Macmillan.
Gellman, J. 1994. “Experiencing God's Infinity.” American Philosophical Quarterly 31:53–61.
George, A. 1991. “Goldbach's Conjecture Can Be Decided in One Minute: On an Alleged Problem for Intuitionism.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91:187–9.
Godfrey, R. 1993. “Paradoxes and Infinite Numbers.” Philosophy 68:541–5.
Gonshor, H. 1986. An Introduction to the Theory of Surreal Numbers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodman, L. 1971. “Ghazālī's Argument from Creation.” International Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 2:67–85, 168–88.
Grünbaum, A. 1950. “Relativity and the Atomicity of Becoming.” Review of Metaphysics 4:143–86.
Grünbaum, A. 1952a. “A Consistent Conception of the Extended Linear Continuum as an Aggregate of Unextended Elements.” Philosophy of Science 19:288–306.
Grünbaum, A. 1952b. “Messrs. Black and Taylor on Temporal Paradoxes.” Analysis 12:144–8.
Grünbaum, A. 1953. “Whitehead's Method of Extensive Abstraction.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 4:215–26.
Grünbaum, A. 1955. “Modern Science and Refutation of the Paradoxes of Zeno.” Scientific Monthly 81:234–9. Reprinted in Salmon (1970), 164–75.
Grünbaum, A. 1967. Modern Science and Zeno's Paradoxes. Middleton, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press; especially “Zeno's Metrical Paradox of Extension,” 115–35. Reprinted in Salmon (1970), 176–99.
Grünbaum, A. 1968. “Are ‘Infinity Machines’ Paradoxical?” Science 159:396–406.
Grünbaum, A. 1973a. “Can an Infinitude of Operations Be Performed in a Finite Time?” In Grünbaum (1973b).
Grünbaum, A. 1973b. Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Grier, M. 1998. “Transcendental Illusion and Transcendental Realism in Kant's Second Antinomy.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 98:47–70.
Gruender, C. 1966. “The Achilles Paradox and Transfinite Numbers.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 17:219–31.
Hájek, A. 2003. “Waging War on Pascal's Wager.” Philosophical Review 112:27–56.
Haldane, J. 1983. “A Benign Regress.” Analysis 43:115–16.
Harrison, C. 1996. “The Three Arrows of Zeno.” Synthese 107:271–92.
Harrison, E. 1987. Darkness at Night: A Riddle of the Universe. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hart, W. 1975/6. “The Potential Infinite.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 76:247–64.
Hazen, A. 1976. “Expressive Completeness in Modal Language.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 5:25–46.
Hazen, A. 1993. “Slicing It Thin.” Analysis 53:189–92.
Hazewinkel, M., ed. 1989. Encyclopedia of Mathematics, vol. 3. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Hinton, J., and C. Martin. 1953/4. “Achilles and the Tortoise.” Analysis 14:56–68.
Holgate, P. 1994. “Mathematical Notes on Ross' Paradox.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 45:302–4.
Horgan, T. 2000. “The Two-Envelope Paradox, Non-Standard Expected Utility, and the Intensionality of Probability.” Nous 34:578–602.
Huby, P. 1971. “Kant or Cantor: That the Universe, If Real, Must Be Finite in Both Space and Time.” Philosophy 46:121–32.
Huby, P. 1973. “Cosmology and Infinity.” Philosophy 48:186–7.
Huggett, N. 1999. “Atomic Metaphysics.” Journal of Philosophy 96:5–24.
Hughes, P., and G. Brecht. 1975. Vicious Circles and Infinity. New York: Doubleday.
Humphrey, T. 1974. “How Descartes Avoids the Hidden Faculties Trap.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 12:371–7.
Isles, D. 1992. “What Evidence Is There That 265536 Is a Natural Number?” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 33:465–80.
Jackson, F., P. Menzies, and G. Oppy. 1994. “The Two Envelope Paradox.” Analysis 54:43–5.
Jacquette, D. 1993. “Kant's Second Antinomy and Hume's Theory of Extensionless Indivisibles.” Kant-Studien 84:38–50.
Jaki, S. 1969. The Paradox of Olber's Paradox. New York: Herder and Herder.
Jeffrey, R. 1983. The Logic of Decision, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Johnson, P. 1993. “Wholes, Parts, and Infinite Collections.” Philosophy 67:367–79.
Johnson, P. 1994. “More about Infinite Numbers.” Philosophy 69:369–70.
Jones, P. 1946. “Achilles and the Tortoise.” Mind 55:341–5.
Jordan, J., ed. 1994. Gambling on God. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.
Jourdain, P. 1910. “The Flying Arrow: An Anachronism.” Mind 19:42–55.
Jozsa, R. 1986. “An Approach to the Modelling of the Physical Continuum.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37:395–404.
Kanomori, A. 1991. The Higher Infinite. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Katĕtor, M., and P. Simon. 1997. “Origins of Dimension Theory.” In C. Aull and R. Lower (eds.), Handbook of the History of General Topology, vol. 1. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 113–34.
King, H. 1949. “Aristotle and the Paradoxes of Zeno.” Journal of Philosophy 46:657–70.
Klein, P. 2003. “When Infinite Regresses Are Not Vicious.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66:718–29.
Knorr, 1982. “Infinity and Continuity: The Interaction of Mathematics and Philosophy in Antiquity.” In Kretzmann (1982).
Knuth, D. 1974. Surreal Numbers. London: Addison-Wesley.
Koetsier, T., and V. Allis. 1997. “Assaying Supertasks.” Logique et Analyse 159:291–313.
Kolmogorov, A. 1933/56. Foundations of the Theory of Probability, translated by N. Morrison. New York: Chelsea.
Koons, R. 1997. “A New Look at a Cosmological Argument.” American Philosophical Quarterly 34:193–211.
Kragh, H. 1996. Cosmology and Controversy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Krausser, P. 1988. “On the Antinomies and the Appendix to Kant's Dialectic in Kant's Critique and Philosophy of Science.” Synthese 77:375–401.
Kretzmann, N., ed. 1982. Infinity and Continuity in Ancient and Medieval Thought. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Kusraer, A., and S. Kutateladze. 1990. Non-Standard Methods of Analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Lauwers, L. 1997. “Infinite Utility: Insisting on Strong Monotonicity.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75:222–33.
Lavine, S. 1991. “Is Quantum Mechanics an Atomistic Theory?” Synthese 89:253–71.
Lavine, S. 1994. Understanding the Infinite. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lavine, S. 1995. “Finite Mathematics.” Synthese 103:389–420.
Lawrence, N. 1950. “Whitehead's Method of Extensive Abstraction.” Philosophy of Science 17:142–63.
Lear, J. 1981. “A Note on Zeno's Arrow.” Phronesis 26:91–104.
Lee, H. 1965. “Are Zeno's Paradoxes Based on a Mistake?” Mind 74:563–70.
Levi, I. 1980. The Enterprise of Knowledge. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Lewis, D. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lewis, D. 1991. Parts of Classes. Oxford: Blackwell.
Littlewood, J. 1953. A Mathematician's Miscellany. London: Methuen.
Loparic, Z. 1990. “The Logical Structure of the First Antinomy.” Kant-Studien 81:280–303.
Machover, M. 1993. “The Place of Non-Standard Analysis in Mathematics and Mathematics Teaching.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 44:205–12.
Mackie, J. 1982. The Miracle of Theism. Oxford: Clarendon.
Maor, E. 1987. To Infinity and Beyond. Boston: Birkhaüser.
Marmura, M. 1957. “The Logical Role of the Argument from Time in the Tahāfut's Second Proof for the World's Pre-Eternity.” Muslim World 47:306–14.
McClennan, E. 1994. “Finite Decision Theory.” In Jordan (1994).
McClennen, E. 1994. “Pascal's Wager and Finite Decision Theory.” In Jordan (1994).
McGrew, T., D. Shier, and H. Silverstein. 1997. “The Two Envelope Paradox Resolved.” Analysis 57:28–33.
McLaughlin, W. 1994. “Resolving Zeno's Paradoxes.” Scientific American (November): 66–71.
McLaughlin, W. 1998. “Thomson's Lamp Is Dysfunctional.” Synthese 116:281–301.
McLaughlin, W., and S. Miller. 1992. “An Epistemological Use of Non-Standard Analysis to Answer Zeno's Objections against Motion.” Synthese 92:371–84.
Monk, N. 1997. “Conceptions of Space-Time: Problems and Possible Solutions.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 28, no. 1:1–34.
Moore, A. 1988. “Aspects of the Infinite in Kant.” Mind 97:205–23.
Moore, A. 1989. “A Problem for Intuitionism: The Apparent Possibility of Performing Infinitely Many Tasks in a Finite Time.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 89:17–34.
Moore, A. 1990. The Infinite. London: Routledge.
Moore, A. 1992. “A Note on Kant's First Antinomy.” Philosophical Quarterly 42:480–5.
Moore, A., ed. 1993. Infinity. Dartmouth: Aldershot.
Moore, M. 2002. A Cantorian Argument against Infinitesimals.” Synthese 133:305–30.
Morriston, W. 1999. “Must the Past Have a Beginning?” Philo 2:5–19.
Morriston, W. 2002c. “Craig on the Actual Infinite.” Religious Studies 38:147–66.
Mundy, B. 1987. “Faithful Representation, Physical Extensive Measurement Theory and Archimedean Axioms.” Synthese 70:373–400.
Mycielski, J. 1981. “Analysis without Actual Infinity.” Journal of Symbolic Logic 46:625–33.
Mycielski, J. 1986. “Locally Finite Theories.” Journal of Symbolic Logic 51:59–62.
Nalebuff, B. 1989. “The Other Person's Envelope Is Always Greener.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3:171–81.
Nelson, E. 1977. “Internal Set Theory: A New Approach to Non-Standard Analysis.” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 83, no. 6:1165–98.
Nelson, E. 1987. Radically Elementary Probability Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Nelson, M. 1991. “Utilitarian Eschatology.” American Philosophical Quarterly 28:339–47.
Ng, Y. 1995. “Infinite Utility and van Liedekerke's Impossibility: A Solution.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73:408–12.
Nolan, D. 1996. “Recombination Unbound.” Philosophical Studies 84:239–62.
Nolan, D. 2001. “What Wrong with Infinite Regresses?” Metaphilosophy 32:523–38.
Nolan, D. 2002. Topics in the Philosophy of Possible Worlds. London: Routledge.
North, J. 1983. “Finite and Otherwise: Aristotle and Some Seventeenth Century Views.” In Shea (1983):113–48.
O'Briant, W. 1979. “Is Descartes' Evil Spirit Finite or Infinite?” Sophia 18:28–32.
O'Leary-Hawthorne, J., and A. Cortens. 1995. “Towards Ontological Nihilism.” Philosphical Studies 79, no. 2:143–65.
Oakes, R. 1997. “The Divine Infinity: Can Traditional Theists Justifiably Reject Pantheism.” Monist 80:251–65.
Oderberg, D. 2002a. “Traversal of the Infinite, the ‘Big Bang,’ and the Kalam Cosmological Argument.” Philosophia Christi 4, no. 2: 303–34.
Oderberg, D. 2002b. “The Tristram Shandy Paradox: A Reply to Graham Oppy.” Philosophia Christi 4, no. 2: 351–60.
Oppy, G. 1990. “On Rescher on Pascal's Wager.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 30:159–68.
Oppy, G. 1991. “Craig, Mackie and the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” Religious Studies 27:189–97.
Oppy, G. 1995a. “Inverse Operations with Transfinite Numbers and the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” International Philosophical Quarterly 35, no. 2:219–21.
Oppy, G. 1995b. “Kalām Cosmological Arguments: Reply to Professor Craig.” Sophia 34:15–29.
Oppy, G. 1995c. Ontological Arguments and Belief in God. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Oppy, G. 1995d. “Professor William Craig's Criticisms of Critiques of Kalām Cosmological Arguments by Paul Davies, Stephen Hawking, and Adolf Grünbaum.” Faith and Philosophy 12:237–50.
Oppy, G. 1996a. “Pascal's Wager Is a Possible Bet (but Not a Very Good One): Reply to Harmon Holcomb III.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 40:101–16.
Oppy, G. 1996b. “Review of W. Craig and Q. Smith, Theism, Atheism and Big Bang Cosmology.” Faith and Philosophy 13:125–33.
Oppy, G. 1997a. “Countable Fusion Not Yet Proven Guilty: It May Be the Whiteheadian Account of Space Whatdunnit.” Analysis 57, no. 4:249–53.
Oppy, G. 1997b. “Pantheism, Quantification, and Mereology.” Monist 80, no. 2:320–36.
Oppy, G. 2000a. “Humean Supervenience?” Philosophical Studies 101, no. 1:75–105.
Oppy, G. 2000b. “On ‘A New Cosmological Argument.’” Religious Studies 36:345–53.
Oppy, G. 2001. “Time, Successive Addition, and the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” Philosophia Christi 3:181–91.
Oppy, G. 2002a. “Arguing about the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” Philo 5, no 1:34–61.
Oppy, G. 2002b. “More Than a Flesh Wound: Reply to Oderberg.” Ars Disputandi 2:1–11. [Http://www.ArsDisputandi.org].
Oppy, G. 2002c. “The Tristram Shandy Paradox: A Response to David S. Oderberg.” Philosophia Christi 4, no. 2:335–49.
Oppy, G. 2003. “From the Tristram Shandy Paradox to the Christmas Shandy Paradox: Reply to Oderberg.” Ars Disputandi 3:1–24. [Http://www.ArsDisputandi.org].
Oppy, G. 2004. “Faulty Reasoning about Default Principles in Cosmological Arguments.” Faith and Philosophy 21:242–9.
Owen, G. 1958. “Zeno and the Mathematicians.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 58:199–222.
Pasyakov, B. 1989. “Dimension.” In Hazewinkel (1989), pp. 188–90.
Peers, A. 1975. Dimension Theory of General Spaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Perez-Laraudogoitia, J. 1997. “Classical Particle Dynamics, Indeterminism, and a Supertask.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48:49–54.
Perez-Laraudogoitia, J. 1998. “Infinity Machines and Creation Ex Nihilo.” Synthese 115:259–65.
Perez-Laraudogoitia, J. 2000. “Priest on the Paradox of the Gods.” Analysis 60:152–5.
Perez-Laraudogoitia, J. 2002a. “On the Dynamics of Alper and Bridger.” Synthese 131:157–71.
Perez-Laraudogoitia, J. 2002b. “Just as Beautiful but Not (Necessarily) a Supertask.” Mind 111:281–7.
Perez-Laraudogoitia, J. 2002c. “Two Ways of Looking at a Newtonian Supertask.” Synthese 131:173–89.
Perez-Laraudogoitia, J. 2003. “A Variant of Benardette's Paradox.” Analysis 63:124–31.
Pomerlau, W. 1985. “Does Reason Demand That God Be Infinite?” Sophia 24:18–27.
Potter, M. 1996. “Taming the Infinite.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47:609–19.
Price, H. 1992. “Metaphysical Pluralism.” Journal of Philosophy 89:387–409.
Priest, G. 1987. In Contradiction. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Priest, G. 1991. “The Limits of Thought — and Beyond.” Mind 100:361–70
Priest, G. 1995. Beyond the Limits of Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Priest, G. 1999. “On a Version of One of Zeno's Paradoxes.” Analysis 59:1–2.
qFiasco, F. 1980. “Another Look at Some of Zeno's Paradoxes.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10:119–30.
Quine, W. 1953. “On What There Is.” In From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1–19.
Radner, M. 1998. “Unlocking the Second Antinomy: Kant and Wulff.” Journal for the History of Philosophy 36:413–41.
Rapaport, A. 1998. Decision Theory and Decision Behaviour. London: Macmillan.
Robinson, A. 1961. “Non Standard Analysis.” Indagationes Mathematicae 23:432–40.
Robinson, A. 1966. Non-Standard Analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Robinson, A. 1973. “Metamathematical Problems.” Journal of Symbolic Logic 38:500–16.
Ross, S. 1988. A First Course in Probability, 3rd ed. London: Macmillan.
Rucker, R. 1982. Infinity and the Mind. Sussex: Harvester.
Russell, B. 1903. The Principles of Mathematics. London: Allen & Unwin.
Russell, B. 1929. Our Knowledge of the External World. New York: Norton, 182–98. Reprinted in Salmon (1970), 45–58.
Sainsbury, M. 1995. Paradoxes. New York: Cambridge.
Salmon, W., ed. 1970. Zeno's Paradoxes. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Samuelson, P. 1977. “St. Petersburg Paradoxes: Defanged, Dissected and Historically Described.” Journal of Economic Literature 15:24–55.
Sanford, D. 1969. “Time May Have a Stop.” Analysis 29:206
Sanford, D. 1975. “Infinity and Vagueness.” Philosophical Review 87:520–35.
Sanford, D. 2003. “Fusion Confusion.” Analysis 63:1–4.
Schlesinger, G. 1994. “A Central Theistic Argument.” In Jordan (1994).
Schock, R. 1982. “Dividing by Zero.” Logique et Analyse 25:213–15.
Schoen, E. 1990. “The Sensory Presentation of Divine Infinity.” Faith and Philosophy 7:3–18.
Scott, A., and D. Scott. 1997. “What Is in the Two Envelope Paradox?” Analysis 57:34–41.
Segel, L. 1991. “The Infinite and Infinitesimal in Models for Natural Phenomena.” Reviews of Modern Physics 63:225–38.
Segerberg, K. 1976. “A Neglected Family of Aggregation Problems in Ethics.” Nous 10:221–47.
Shannon, G. 1997. “Some Definitions of ‘The Smallest Infinity.’” Logique et Analyse 160:345–56.
Shearman, J. 1908. “Infinite Divisibility.” Mind 17:394–6.
Sherry, D. 1988. “Zeno's Metrical Paradox Revisited.” Philosophy of Science 55:58–73.
Sierpinski, W. 1965. Cardinal and Ordinal Numbers. Warsaw: PWN-Polish Scientific.
Simons, P. 1987. Parts: A Study in Ontology. Oxford: Clarendon.
Skyrms, B. 1966. Choice and Chance. Belmont: Dickenson.
Skyrms, B. 1983. “Zeno's Paradox of Measure.” In Cohen and Lauden (1983):223–54.
Skyrms, B. 1993. “A Uniform Positive Probability on Natural Numbers.” Unpublished ms.
Skyrms, B., and W. Harper, eds. 1988. Causation, Chance and Credence, vol. 1. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Small, R. 1986. “Tristram Shandy's Last Page.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37:213–16.
Smith, Q. 1985. “Kant and the Beginning of the World.” New Scholasticism 59:339–48.
Smith, Q. 1987. “Infinity and the Past.” Philosophy of Science 54:63–75.
Smith, Q. 1988. “The Uncaused Beginning of the Universe.” Philosophy of Science 55:39–57.
Smith, Q. 1991. “Atheism, Theism and Big Bang Cosmology.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69:48–65.
Smith, Q. 1993. “Reply to Craig: The Possible Infinitude of the Past.” International Philosophical Quarterly 33:109–15.
Smith, Q. 1995a. “A Defence of a Principle of Sufficient Reason.” Metaphilosophy 26:97–106.
Smith, Q. 1995b. “Internal and External Causal Explanation of the Universe.” Philosophical Studies 79:283–310.
Smith, Q. 1997. “Simplicity and Why the Universe Exists.” Philosophy 72:125–32.
Smith, Q. 1999. “The Reason the Universe Exists Is That It Caused Itself to Exist.” Philosophy 74:579–86.
Smith, Q. 2000. “Problem's with John Earman's Attempt to Reconcile Theism with General Relativity.” Erkenntnis 52:1–27.
Sorabji, R. 1983. Time, Creation and the Continuum. London: Duckworth.
Sorenson, R. 1994. “Infinite Decision Theory.” In Jordan (1994).
Stroyon, K., and W. Luxemburg. 1976. Introduction to the Theory of Infinitesimals. London: Academic.
Stump, E. 1997. “Simplicity.” In P. Quinn and C. Taliaferro (eds.), A Companion to Philosophy of Religion. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sweeney, E. 1993. “Thomas Aquinas' Double Metaphysics of Simplicity and Infinity.” International Philosophical Quarterly 33:297–317.
Swinburne, R. 1966. “The Beginning of the Universe.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 40:125–38.
Swinburne, R. 1968. Space and Time. London: Macmillan.
Taylor, R. 1951. “Mr. Black on Temporal Paradoxes.” Analysis 12:38–44.
Taylor, R. 1952. “Mr. Wisdom on Temporal Paradoxes.” Analysis 13:15–17.
Taylor, R. 1963. Metaphysics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Teller, P. 1989. “Infinite Renormalisation.” Philosophy of Science 56:238–57.
Thomason, S. 1982. “Euclidean Infinitesimals.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 63:168–85.
Thomson, J. 1954. “Tasks and Supertasks.” Analysis 15:1–13.
Thomson, J. 1970. “Comments on Professor Benacerraf's Paper.” In Salmon (1970), 130–8.
Tomberlin, J., ed. 1988. Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 2. Atascadero, Calif.: Ridgeview.
Ushenko, A. 1946. “Zeno's Paradoxes.” Mind 55:151–65.
Vallentyne, P. 1993. “Utilitarianism and Infinite Utility.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71:212–17.
Vallentyne, P. 1995. “Infinite Utility: Anonymity and Person-Centredness.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73:413–20.
Vallentyne, P., and S. Kagan. 1997. “Infinite Utility and Finitely Additive Value Theory.” Journal of Philosophy 94:5–26.
Van Bendegem, J. 1987. “Zeno's Paradoxes and the Tile Argument.” Philosophy of Science 54:295–302.
Van Bendegem, J. 1994. “Ross' Paradox Is an Impossible Super-task.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 45:743–8.
Van Cleve, J. 1981. “Reflections on Kant's Second Antimony.” Synthese 47:481–94.
Van Dantzig, D. 1955. “Is a Finite Number?” Dialectica 9:273–7.
Van Fraassen, B. 1995. “‘World’ Is Not a Count Noun.” Nous 29:139–57.
Van Liederkerke, L. 1995. “Should Utilitarians Be Cautious about an Infinite Future?” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73:405–7.
Vaught, R. 1995. Set Theory: An Introduction, 2nd ed. Boston: Birkhaüser.
Vilenkin, N. 1995. In Search of Infinity. Boston: Birkhaüser.
Vlastos, G. 1966a. “A Note on Zeno's Arrow.” Phronesis 11:3–18.
Vlastos, G. 1966b. “Zeno's Race Course.” Journal of History of Philosophy 4:95–108.
Wagner, C. 1999. “Misadventures in Conditional Expectation: The Two Envelope Paradox.” Erkenntnis 51:233–41.
Walker, R. 1997. “Sufficient Reason.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 97:109–23.
Watling, J. 1952. “The Sum of an Infinite Series.” Analysis 13:39–46.
Weingard, R. 1979. “General Relativity and the Length of the Past.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30:170–2.
Weirich, P. 1984. “The St. Petersburg Gamble and Risk.” Theory and Decision 17:193–202.
Weyl, H. 1946. Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
White, A. 1965. “Achilles at the Shooting Gallery.” Mind 74:141–2.
White, M. 1987. “The Spatial Arrow Paradox.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 68:71–7.
Whitrow, G. 1978. “On the Impossibility of an Infinite Past.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 29:39–45.
Wiggins, D. 1996. “Sufficient Reason: A Principle in Diverse Guises, Both Ancient and Modern.” Acta Philosophica Fennica 61:117–32.
Williams, J. 1981. “Justified Belief and the Infinite Regress Argument.” American Philosophical Quarterly 18:85–8.
Wilson, P. 1991. “What Is the Explanandum of the Anthropic Principle?” American Philosophical Quarterly 28:167–73.
Wisdom, J. 1941. “Why Achilles Does Not Fail to Catch the Tortoise.” Mind 50:58–73.
Wisdom, J. 1952. “Achilles on a Physical Racecourse.” Analysis 12:67–72.
Wittgenstein, L. 1975. Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wolfson, H. 1966. “Patristic Arguments against the Eternity of the World.” Harvard Theological Review 59:354–67.
Wolfson, H. 1976. The Philosophy of the Kalām. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wright, C. 1985. “Skolem and the Sceptic.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society supp. vol.: 116–37.
Yablo, S. 2000. “A Reply to New Zeno.” Analysis 60:148–51.
Zabell, S. 1988. “Symmetry and Its Discontents.” In Skyrms and Harper (1988), 155–90.
Zangari, M. 1994. “Zeno, Zero, and Indeterminate Forms: Instants in the Logic of Motion.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72:187–204.
Zuckero, M. 2001. “A Dissolution of Zeno's Paradoxes of the Dichotomy and the Flight of the Arrow.” Dialogue 43:46–51.