Please wait, page is loading...
Loading...
x

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Continue browsing to accept cookies or find out how to manage your settings.

Skip to Main Content
  • Accessibility
  • Help
  • FAQs
  • Contact Us
  • Register
Advanced Search
  • Browse Cases
  • Search Results
  • Contributors
  • My Reports
    • Recent History
    • Saved Searches
    • Saved Cases
    • Alerts
    • Tell Us About
  • For Librarians
Login
User Login
User Login Institutional Login Register for an Account
Enter Login Details'/>
Loading
Forgotten your password?
  • Home
  • ICSID
  •  United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Canada pp. 436-527

You do not currently have access to this case. Please login or speak to your librarian to request that this volume is added to your package. For more information please see the FAQ section.

Volume
United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Canada
17 ICSID 436
  • Subject
  • Casehead
  • Summary
  • Judgment
  • Counsel
  • Counsel
  • Counsel
  • Parallel Citation
  • Half title page
  • Half title page
  • Half title page
  • Title page
  • Imprints page
  • Contents
  • Introduction
  • Editorial Note
  • Acknowledgements
  • Table of Cases Reported in Volume 17
  • Table of Cases Reported in Volumes 1–17
  • Digest of Cases Reported in Volume 17
  • Cases

    • TELEFÓNICA v. ARGENTINA
    • PAN AMERICAN ENERGY AND BP ARGENTINA v. ARGENTINA
    • INCEYSA VALLISOLETANA v. EL SALVADOR
    • TELENOR v. HUNGARY
    • WORLD DUTY FREE v. KENYA
    • HELNAN INTERNATIONAL v. EGYPT
    • SAIPEM v. BANGLADESH
    • UPS v. CANADA
    • AZURIX v. ARGENTINA
    • PLAMA v. BULGARIA
  • Index
  • Save Case
  • Read PDF
  • Export Citation
  • of 527 Go
  • of 1 Go
  • Hide page breaks
Jurisdiction NAFTA, Article 1116Claim by an investor as a party on its own behalfNAFTA, Article 1117Claim by an investor on behalf of an enterpriseLimitation period for claimsEffect of continuing conduct on limitation periodEstablishment of damages not precursor to submitting a claim
Jurisdiction NAFTA, Articles 1116 and Article 1117 as different grounds for claimsDifferent grounds for claim and implications for substance of claims or right of partiesWhether investor may claim for losses incurred by subsidiary
Jurisdiction Damages, demonstration of at jurisdictional phaseWhether separation of causation and damages appropriateJurisdiction established where prima facie case of damages shown
State responsibility AttributionNAFTA, Articles 1102 and 1105Parties to NAFTADistinction between the State and monopolies and enterprisesILC Articles on State ResponsibilityWhether Article 4 of ILC Articles applies to NAFTA obligationsNAFTA, Chapters 11 and 15ILC Articles on State Responsibility, Article 55
State responsibility AttributionILC Articles on State ResponsibilityWhether Article 5 of ILC Articles applied to actions of State monopolyWhether NAFTA a special regime of international law“Residual character” of Article 5 of ILC Draft Articles
State responsibility AttributionNAFTA, Articles 1102 and 1105Exercise of governmental authority by monopoly or enterpriseWhether commercial decisions have governmental character
NAFTA National treatmentNAFTA, Article 1102Meaning of “like circumstances”Postal services as distinct from courier servicesEffect of competitive relationship between investors on establishing “like circumstances”Effect of international regulations on establishing “like circumstances”Kyoto Convention to Standardize Customs Procedures and Policies
NAFTA NAFTA obligationsNAFTA, Articles 1502(3)(a) and 1503(2)Party’s obligation to ensure that State enterprises not act inconsistently with its NAFTA obligationsScope of regulatory, administrative or other governmental authority by State enterprises and monopoliesWhether actions of State enterprise constitute commercial decisions or decisions with governmental character
NAFTA National treatment, exceptions toNAFTA, Article 1108(7)Procurement exceptionMeaning of “procurement”NAFTA, Article 2106 and Annex 2106Cultural heritage industries exceptionNAFTA, Article 1108“Subsidies” exceptionWhether payments to entity constitute subsidy
Jurisdiction Specificity of claimsFailure to provide sufficient specification
United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Canada footnote 1
Award. 24 May 2007
( Arbitration Tribunal: Keith, President; Cass and Fortier, Members)

The Case Summary is available to subscribers only.

  • of 527 Go
  • of 1 Go
  • Hide page breaks
  • Back to top
  • Cross Ref
  • ACAP
  • Enabled
Stay up to date
  • Find us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Youtube
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Accessibility
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Site Map
© Cambridge University Press 2016