5 - Board on Task: developing a comprehensive understanding of the performance of boards  pp. 225-250

Board on Task: developing a comprehensive understanding of the performance of boards

By Jaap Winter and Erik van de Loo

Image View Previous Chapter Next Chapter



Introduction

The governance crisis of 2001–03 and the financial crisis of 2007–08 have sparked and continue to spark extensive debate on and regulation of boards of directors of companies. The term ‘board’ in this chapter is used to describe the interaction between non-executives and executives, regardless of whether the organisational structure is a one-tier board which comprises executive directors and non-executive directors, or a two-tier model in which executive directors and non-executive directors take seats in two separate boards.

In short, the governance crisis revealed that boards of listed companies apparently were unable to stop executives from manipulating financial statements in order to boost their bonuses, stock options and performance shares. In the financial crisis, boards of financial institutions were unable to ensure proper risk management (Winter 2012a). The two crises have left us wondering what boards and, within boards, what non-executives are actually doing or should be doing. The regulatory response in both cases has been to enforce the monitoring role of non-executives towards executives, fuelled by the dominant economic corporate governance model of the agency theory. Non-executive duties in fields like audit, internal control and risk management, which we refer to as ‘corporate hygiene’, have been described and detailed explicitly in mandatory regulation and corporate governance codes. At the same time, the personal responsibility of non-executives for a professional execution of this monitoring role has been emphasised.

Adams, R. and D. Ferreira 2008. ‘Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance’, available at .
Assink, B. F. 2007. ‘Rechterlijke toetsing van bestuurlijk gedrag’, Series Instituut voor Ondernemingsrecht, 59, Kluwer.
Bainbridge, S. 2002. ‘Why a board? Group decision making in corporate governance’, Vanderbilt Law Review 55: 1–55.
Bazerman, M. H. and D. Moore 2009. Judgment in Managerial Decision Making, 7th edn., John Wiley & Sons.
Bebchuk, L. and J. Fried 2004. Pay Without Performance: The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive Compensation. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
Blair, M. and L. Stout 1999. ‘A team production theory of corporate law’, Virginia Law Review 85: 247–328.
Borwick, I. 2006. ‘Organizational Role Analysis: Managing Strategic Change in Business Settings’, in John Newton , Susan Long and Burkard Sievers (eds.), Coaching in Depth; The Organizational Role Analysis Approach. London, Karnac, pp. 3–28.
Donaldson, L. 1990. ‘The ethereal hand: Organizational economics and management theory’, Academy of Management Review 15: 377.
Donaldson, L. and J. H. Davis 1990. ‘Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns’, Australian Journal of Management 16: 51.
Erhard, W. , M. Jensen , S. Zaffron and K. Granger 2011. ‘Introductory Reading For Being a Leader and The Effective Exercise of Leadership’: An Ontological/Phenomenological Model, Harvard Business School NOM Research Paper No. 10–091, available at .
Forbes, D. P. and F. J. Milliken 1999. ‘Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups’, Academy of Management Review 24: 489–505.
Hau, H. and M. Thum 2009. ‘Subprime Crisis and Board (In)Competence: Private vs. Public Banks in Germany’, ECGI Working Paper Series in Finance No. 247/2009, available at .
Heifetz, R. A. and M. Linsky 2002. Leadership on the Line: Staying Alive through the Dangers of Leading. Harvard Business School Press.
Jensen, M. and K. Murphy 2004. ‘Remuneration, Where We’ve Been, How We Got There, What Are the Problems and How We Fix Them’, ECGI Finance Working Paper No. 44/2004, available at .
Jensen, M. and W. Meckling 1976. ‘Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure’, Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305–60.
Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow, London, Allen Lane: pp. 261–4.
Kahneman, D. J. L. Knetsch and R. H. Thaler 1986. ‘Fairness and the assumptions of economics’, The Journal of Business 59: 285–300.
Kraakman, R. , D. Davies , H. Hansmann , G. Hertig , K. Hopt , H. Kanda and E. Bock 2009. The Anatomy of Corporate Law. Oxford University Press, 2nd edn.
Kronman, A. T. 1980. ‘Wealth maximization as a normative principle’, 9 Journal of Legal Studies 227.
Langevoort, D. 2000. ‘The Human Nature of Corporate Boards: Law, Norms and Unintended Consequences of Independence and Accountability’, Georgetown University Law Center Business, Economics and Regulatory Law Working Paper No. 241402, available at .
Levrau, A. and L. Van den Berghe 2007. ‘Corporate Governance and Board Effectiveness: Beyond Formalism’, Vlerick Leuven Gent Working Paper Series 2007/03, available at .
Long, S. , J. Newton and J. Chapman 2006. ‘Role dialogue: Organizational Role Analysis with pairs from the same organization’, in Newton , Longs and Sievers (eds.), Coaching in Depth, pp. 95–112.
Lorcsh, J. 2012. ‘Boardroom challenges, lessons from the financial crisis and beyond’, in Jay Lorsch (ed.), The Future of Boards: Meeting the Governance Challenges of the Twenty-First Century, Harvard Business Review Press, p. 13.
Masouros, P. 2012. ‘Corporate law and economic stagnation: How shareholder value and short-termism contribute to the decline of the western economies’, Ph.D. Leiden University, Eleven International Publishers, pp. 112–14.
McKinsey Quarterly (April 2012), available at .
Newton, J. , S. Long and B. Sievers (eds.) 2006. Coaching in Depth: The Organizational Role Analysis Approach. London, Karnac.
Partnoy, F. 2003. Infectious Greed: How Deceit and Risk Corrupted the Financial Markets. Times Books.
Posner, R. A. 2003. Economic Analysis of Law. New York, Aspen Publishers.
Pronin, E. and M. Kugler 2007. ‘Valuing thoughts, ignoring behavior: the introspection illusion as a source of the bias blind spot’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43: 565–78.
Sievers, B. and U. Beumer 2006. ‘Organizational Role Analysis and consultation: the organization as inner object’, In Newton , Long and Sievers (eds.), Coaching in Depth, pp. 65–81.
Tamanah, B. 2006. Law as a Means to an End: Threat to the Rule of Law. Cambridge University Press.
Tosi, H. L. and L. R. Gomez-Mejia 1994. ‘CEO remuneration monitoring and firm performance’, Academy of Management Journal 37: 1002–123.
Van de Loo, E.L.H.M. and A. Kemna 2012. ‘Roles, risks and complexity: An exploration of the triangle institutional investors, executive boards and supervisory boards in the Netherlands’ in S. Long and B. Sievers (eds.), Towards a Socioanalysis of Money, Finance and Capital(ism). London and New York, Routledge, pp. 178–91.
Van Zijl, N. J.M. 2012. ‘The importance of board independence: A multidisciplinary approach’, Series Instituut voor Ondernemingsrecht 90, Kluwer.
Winter, J. 2012a. ‘The Financial Crisis: Does Good Corporate Governance Matter and How to Achieve It?’, in Eddy Wymeersch , Klaus J. Hopt and Guido Ferrarini (eds.), Financial Regulation and Supervision: A Post-Crisis Analysis. Oxford University Press, pp. 368–88.
Winter, J. 2012b. ‘Corporate Governance Going Astray: Executive Remuneration Built to Fail’, in Randall Thomas and Jennifer Hill (eds.), Research Handbook on Executive Pay. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, pp. 199–216.