7 - Post-modern perspectives on orthodox positivism  pp. 182-210

Post-modern perspectives on orthodox positivism

By Ingo Venzke

Image View Previous Chapter Next Chapter



Introduction

This contribution explains the travails of international legal positivism (ILP) from post-modern perspectives. It identifies conventional precepts of orthodox ILP and shows how variants of post-modern thinking unravel them. It thereby provides part of the background against which current ILP needs to argue. The focus rests on three main such precepts and their critique: first, orthodox ILP works against the backdrop of a given language that stands stable and unsoiled from the operation of the law. Second, it embraces a political philosophy that gives the legal subject – traditionally the sovereign state – a foundational role. Third, orthodox ILP sees but a small space for politics in international law that is confined to law's creation through legal sources. These three basic precepts relate to linguistics (the location and generation of meaning), to subjectivity (the place of state consent) and to politics (here understood as the struggle for power and its exercise).

I will present key concepts of post-modern thinking to question each of these precepts. The vivacious concept of performativity embodies lessons of the linguistic turn. It lets go of the idea that language operates as a scheme that exists independent of its operation and instead appreciates how social practices create the language they use. Performativity internalises the generation of meaning into communicative practice and reveals that legal interpretation is a creative activity that contributes to the making of what it purports to find. Deconstruction suggests unveiling conflicting diversity underneath harmony and unity not only within legal and social order, but also within any subject. It disassembles state consent as a foundational anchor and further lays bare how consent can be an expression of power structures. Governmentality, finally, exposes the many faces of power that not only work through hard law and variants of visible coercion, but also in much more penetrating ways. Law and politics are much more entangled than ILP would traditionally have it.

‘sovereignty as subjectivity’, inspired by Foucault, Tanja E. Aalberts, Constructing Sovereignty between Politics and Law (Routledge 2012) 125–142
Adolf Merkl, ‘Das Doppelte Rechtsantlitz: Eine Betrachtung aus der Erkenntnistheorie des Rechtes’ 47 Juristische Blätter (1918) 425–427
Adolf Merkl, ‘Prolegomena einer Theorie des rechtlichen Stufenbaus’ in Alfred Verdross (ed.), Gesellschaft, Staat und Recht: Festschrift Hans Kelsen zum 50. Geburtstag gewidmet (Springer 1931) 252–294
Alan Boyle, ‘Soft Law in International Law-Making’ in Malcom D. Evans (ed.), International Law (2nd edn Oxford University Press 2006) 141–157
Albert Bleckmann, ‘Zur Feststellung und Auslegung von Völkergewohnheitsrecht’ 37 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (1977) 504–529
Alexander Orakhelashvili, The Interpretation of Acts and Rules in Public International Law (Oxford University Press 2008) 55
Amy Allen, ‘The Anti-Subjective Hypothesis: Michel Foucault and the Death of the Subject’ 31 Philosophical Forum (2000) 113–130
András Jakab, ‘Probleme der Stufenbaulehre: Das Scheitern des Ableitungsgedankens und die Aussichten der Reinen Rechtslehre’ 91 Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie (2005) 333–365
André Nollkaemper, National Courts and the International Rule of Law (Oxford University Press 2011) 6–10
Andreas Fischer-Lescano and Gunther Teubner, ‘Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law’ 25 Michigan Journal of International Law (2004) 999–1045
Armin von Bogdandy et al. (eds), The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions: Advancing International Institutional Law (Springer 2010)
Armin von Bogdandy, Ingo Venzke, ‘On the Democratic Justification of International Judicial Lawmaking’ 12 German Law Journal (2011) 1341–1370
Armin von Bogdandy, Sergio Dellavalle, ‘Ad hostes docere: Zu den Ursprüngen und zur Präsenz partikularistisch-holistischen Denkens’ in Andreas Fischer-Lescano et al. (eds), Frieden in Freiheit – Peace in Liberty – Paix en liberté: Festschrift für Michael Bothe zum 70. Geburtstag (Nomos 2008) 847–863
August Reinisch, ‘The International Relations of National Courts: A Discourse on International Law Norms on Jurisdictional and Enforcement Immunity’ in August Reinisch, Ursula Kriebaum (eds), The Law of International Relations: Liber Amicorum Hanspeter Neuhold (Eleven 2007) 289–309
Bettina Stoitzner, ‘Der Stufenbau der Rechtsordnung’ in Stanley L. Paulson, Robert Walter (eds), Untersuchungen zur Reinen Rechtslehre (Manz 1986) 51–90
Bhupinder S. Chimni, ‘The Meaning of Words and the Role of UNHCR in Voluntary Repatriation’ 5 International Journal of Refugee Law (1993) 442–460
Brian Bix, Law, Language and Legal Determinacy (Clarendon Press 1993) 38–45
Brian Z. Tamanaha, A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society (Oxford University Press 2001) 142
Brigitte Schleiben-Lange, ‘Die Französische Revolution und die Sprache’ 41 Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik (1981) 90–123
Chantal Mouffe, On the Political: Thinking in Action (Routledge 2005) 18
Charles Taylor, ‘To Follow a Rule…’ in Craig Calhoun, Edward LiPuma, Moishe Postone (eds), Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives (University of Chicago Press 1993) 45–60
Damiano Canale, Giovanni Tuzet, ‘On Legal Inferentialism: Toward a Pragmatics of Semantic Content in Legal Interpretation?’ 20 Ratio Juris (2007) 32–44
David Kennedy, ‘The Mystery of Global Governance’ 1 Ohio Northern University Law Review (2008) 827–860
Dennis M. Patterson, ‘Dworkin on the Semantics of Legal and Political Concepts’ 26 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies (2006) 545–557
Dennis M. Patterson, ‘Law's Pragmatism: Law as Practice and Narrative’ 76 Virginia Law Review (1990) 937–996
Dennis M. Patterson, Law and Truth (Oxford University Press 1999) 96
Dietrich Busse, ‘Semantic Strategies as a Means of Politics: Linguistic Approaches to the Analysis of “Semantic Stuggles”’ in Pertti Ahonen (ed.), Tracing the Semiotic Boundaries of Politics (Walter de Gruyter 1993) 121–128
Eyal Benvenisti, ‘Reclaiming Democracy: The Strategic Uses of Foreign and International Law by National Courts’ 102 AJIL (2008) 241–274
Ferdinand de Saussure, Course in General Linguistics (Open Court 1983) 65
Fleur Johns, Non-Legality in International Law: Unruly Law (Cambridge University Press 2013)
Fleur Johns, Richard Joyce, Sundhya Pahuja (eds), Events: The Force of International Law (Routledge 2011)
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts (Suhrkamp 1986) 34
Gerry Simpson, ‘Imagined Consent: Democratic Liberalism in International Legal Theory’ 15 Australian Yearbook of International Law (1994) 103–128
Godefridus J. H. van Hoof, Rethinking the Sources of International Law (Kluwer 1983)
Gunther Teubner, Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization (Oxford University Press 2012)
Hans Kelsen, Principles of International Law (Rinehart 1952) 303
Hans Kelsen, Reine Rechtslehre: Einleitung in die rechtswissenschaftliche Problematik (Deuticke 1934) 74
Helen M. Kinsella, ‘Securing the Civilian: Sex and Gender in the Laws of War’ in Michael Barnett, Raymond Duvall (eds), Power in Global Governance (Cambridge University Press 2005) 249–272
Herbert Marcuse, One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society (Beacon Press 1964)
Hersch Lauterpacht, ‘Codification and Development of International Law’ 49 AJIL (1955) 16–43
Hersch Lauterpacht, ‘Decisions of Municipal Courts as a Source of International Law’ 10 BYBIL (1929) 65–95
HLA Hart, ‘Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals’ 71 Harvard Law Review (1957–1958) 593–629
HLA Hart, The Concept of Law (Clarendon Press 1961) 92
Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason (Paul Guyer, Allen W. Wood (trs), Cambridge University Press 1998) 268
Immanuel Kant, Die Metaphysik der Sitten (Suhrkamp 1977) 466–467
Ingo Venzke, ‘Legal Contestation about “Enemy Combatants”: On the Exercise of Power in Legal Interpretation’ 5 Journal of International Law & International Relations (2009) 155–184
Ingo Venzke, How Interpretation Makes International Law: On Semantic Change and Normative Twists (Oxford University Press 2012)
Ingo Venzke, How Interpretation Makes International Law: On Semantic Change and Normative Twists (Oxford University Press 2012)
Jörg Kammerhofer, Uncertainty in International Law: A Kelsenian Perspective (Routledge 2011) 197–199
Jürgen Habermas, Der Philosophische Diskurs der Moderne: Zwölf Vorlesungen (Suhrkamp 1988)
Jacques Derrida, ‘Force of Law: The “Mystical Foundation of Authority”’ 11 Cardozo Law Review (1990) 920–1045
Jacques Derrida, Of Grammatology (Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak (tr.), Johns Hopkins University Press 1997)
Janne Elisabeth Nijman, The Concept of International Legal Personality: An Inquiry Into the History and Theory of International Law (Asser Press 2004)
Jason Beckett, ‘Fragmentation, Openness and Hegemony: Adjudication and the WTO’ in Meredith Kolsky Lewis, Susy Frankel (eds), International Economic Law and National Autonomy (Cambridge University Press 2010) 44–70
Jasper Liptow, Regel und Interpretation: Eine Untersuchung zur sozialen Struktur sprachlicher Praxis (Velbrück 2004) 220–226
Jean d’Aspremont, Formalism and the Sources of International Law: A Theory of the Ascertainment of Legal Rules (Oxford University Press 2011) 63–66
Jean-François Lyotard, ‘Memorandum über die Legitimität’ in Peter Engelmann (ed.), Postmoderne und Dekonstruktion: Texte französicher Philosophen der Gegenwart (Reclam 2004) 54–75
Jean-François Lyotard, The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (University of Minnesota Press 1984)
Jean-Marc Sorel and Valérie Boré Eveno, ‘Article 31’ in Olivier Corten, Pierre Klein (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Oxford University Press 2011) 804–837
Jeremy Bentham, ‘Principles of International Law’ in John Bowring (ed.), The Works of Jeremy Bentham, Vol. 2 (William Tait 1843) 535–571
Jochen von Bernstorff, The Public International Law Theory of Hans Kelsen: Believing in Universal Law (Cambridge University Press 2010) 271
John L. Austin, ‘Performative Utterances’ in James O. Urmson, Geoffrey James Warnock (eds), Philosophical Papers (Oxford University Press 1979) 233–253
John L. Austin, How to Do Things with Words (Oxford University Press 1979) 138–139
Judith Butler, Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative (Routledge 1997)
Julius Goebel, The Equality of States: A Study in the History of Law (Cambridge University Press 1925) 34
Julius Stone, ‘On the Vocation of the International Law Commission’ 57 Columbia Law Review (1957) 16–51
Liam Murphy, ‘Better to See Law This Way’ 83 New York University Law Review (2008) 1088–1108
Ludwig Wittgenstein, On Certainty (Blackwell 1969)
Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations (Blackwell 1958)
Maarten Bos, ‘Recognized Manifestations of International Law: A New Theory of Sources’ 19 German Yearbook of International Law (1977) 9–76
Markus Winkler, ‘Die Normativität des Praktischen’ 64 JuristenZeitung (2009) 821–829
Martti Koskenniemi, ‘International Law and Hegemony: A Reconfiguration’ 17 Cambridge Review of International Affairs (2004) 197–218
Martti Koskenniemi, ‘International Law: Constitutionalism, Managerialism and the Ethos of Legal Education’ 1 European Journal of Legal Studies (2007) 1–18
Martti Koskenniemi, ‘The Politics of International Law’ 1 EJIL (1990) 4–32
Martti Koskenniemi, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (Finnish Lawyers’ Publishing Co. 1989, reissued Cambridge University Press 2005) 397–473
Matthew Eagleton-Pierce, Symbolic Power in the World Trade Organization (Oxford University Press 2013)
Matthias Goldmann, ‘We Need to Cut Off the Head of the King: Past, Present, and Future Approaches to International Soft Law’ 25 LJIL (2012) 335–368
Matthias Goldmann, Handlungsformen internationaler öffentlicher Gewalt: Zur Dogmatik von Soft Law und Informationsakten im Recht der internationalen Institutionen (doctoral thesis, University of Heidelberg, 2013) 130–154
Maurice Mendelson, ‘The Formation of Customary International Law’ 272 Recueil des Cours (1998) 155–410
Maurice Merleau-Ponty, ‘Everywhere and Nowhere’ in Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Signs (Richard C. McCleary (tr.), Northwestern University Press 1964) 126–158
Michael Akehurst, ‘Custom as a Source of International Law’ 47 BYBIL (1976) 1–53
Michael Barnett, Raymond Duvall, ‘Power in Global Governance’ in Michael Barnett, Raymond Duvall (eds), Power in Global Governance (Cambridge University Press 2005) 1–32
Michael Hardt, Antonio Negri, Empire (Harvard University Press 2002)
Michael Waibel, ‘[Review Essay]: Demystifying the Art of Interpretation’ 22 EJIL (2011) 571–588
Michel Foucault, ‘Afterword: The Subject and Power’ in Hubert L. Dreyfus, Paul Rabinow (eds), Michel Foucault: Beyond Structualism and Hermeneutics (University of Chicago Press 1983) 208–226
Michel Foucault, ‘Governmentality’ (Rosi Braidotti and Colin Gordon (trs)) in Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon, Peter Miller (eds), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (University of Chicago Press 1991) 87–104
Michel Foucault, ‘Nietzsche, Genealogy, History’ in Donald F. Bouchart (ed.), Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews (Cornell University Press 1977) 139–164
Michel Foucault, ‘Two Lectures’ in Colin Gordon (ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and other Writings 1972–1977 (Alessandro Fontana, Pasquale Pasquino (trs), Pantheon Books 1980) 78–108
Michel Foucault, History of Sexuality, Vol. 1 (Robert Hurley (tr.), Vintage Books 1990) 90
Neil Walker, ‘Postnational Constitutionalism and Postnational Public Law: A Tale of Two Neologisms’ 3 Transnational Legal Theory (2012) 61–85
Nico Krisch, ‘Global Governance as Public Authority: An Introduction’ 10 International Journal of Constitutional Law (2012) 976–987
Niklas Luhmann, Das Recht der Gesellschaft (Suhrkamp 1993) 256
Niklas Luhmann, Law as a Social System (Oxford University Press 2004) 125–128
Paul Guggenheim, ‘Contribution à l'histoire des sources du droit des gens’ 4 Recueil des Cours (1958) 1–84
Pierre Bourdieu, ‘The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field’ 38 Hastings Law Journal (1987) 814–853
Prosper Weil, ‘Towards Relative Normativity in International Law?’ 77 AJIL (1983) 413–442
Ralph Christensen, ‘Neo-Pragmatismus: Brandom’ in Sonja Buckel, Ralph Christensen, Andreas Fischer-Lescano (eds), Neue Theorien des Rechts (Lucius und Lucius 2009) 239–262
Ralph Christensen, Hans Kudlich, Gesetzesbindung: Vom vertikalen zum horizontalen Verständnis (Duncker & Humblot 2008)
Ralph Christensen, Kent D. Lerch, ‘Performanz: Die Kunst, Recht geschehen zu lassen’ in Kent D. Lerch (ed.), Die Sprache des Rechts, Vol. 3 (Walter de Gruyter 2006) 55–132
Reinhart Koselleck, ‘Begriffsgeschichte and Social History’ in Reinhart Koselleck, Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time (Keith Tribe (tr.), Columbia University Press 1979) 75–93
Reinhart Koselleck, ‘Staat und Souveränität III’ in Otto Brunner, Werner Conze, Reinhart Kosseleck (eds), Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, Vol. 6 (Klett-Cotta 1990) 25–64
Reinhart Koselleck, Begriffsgeschichten: Studien zur Semantik und Pragmatik der politischen und sozialen Sprache (Suhrkamp 2006) 298
Richard Rorty (ed.), The Linguistic Turn: Essays in Philosophical Method (Chicago University Press 1992)
Richard Rorty, ‘Introduction: Pragmatism and Philosophy’ in Richard Rorty, The Consequences of Pragmatism: Essays 1972–1980 (University of Minnesota Press 1982)
Robert Brandom, ‘Some Pragmatist Themes in Hegel's Idealism: Negotiation and Administration in Hegel's Account of the Structure and Content of Conceptual Norms’ 7 European Journal of Philosophy (1999) 164–189
Robert Kolb, ‘Selected Problems in the Theory of Customary International Law’ 50 Netherlands International Law Review (2003) 119–150
Sabine Müller-Mall, Performative Rechtserzeugung: Eine theoretische Annäherung (Velbrück 2012) 24
Stanley Fish, ‘The Law Wishes to Have a Formal Existence’ in Stanley Fish, There's No Such Thing as Free Speech and It Is a Good Thing Too (Oxford University Press 1991) 141–179
Stanley Fish, Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies (Duke University Press 1989) 488–491
Stanley Fish, Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communitites (Harvard University Press 1980)
Sybille Krämer, Sprache, Sprechakt, Kommunikation: Sprachtheoretische Positionen des 20. Jahrhunderts (Suhrkamp 2001) 19–36
Tanja E. Aalberts, Ben Golder, ‘On the Uses of Foucault for International Law’ 25 LJIL (2012) 603–608
Theodor W. Adorno, Minima Moralia: Reflections from Damaged Life (E. F. N. Jephcott (tr.), Verso 1978)
Thomas Biebricher, ‘Macht und Recht: Foucault’ in Sonja Buckel, Ralph Christensen, Andreas Fischer-Lescano (eds), Neue Theorien des Rechts (Lucius und Lucius 2009) 139–162
Thomas Skouteris, ‘The Force of a Doctrine: Art. 38 of the PCIJ Statute and the Sources of International Law’ in Fleur Johns, Richard Joyce, Sundhya Pahuja (eds), Events: The Force of International Law (Routledge 2011) 69–80
Ulrich Fastenrath, ‘A Political Theory of Law: Escaping the Aporia of the Debate on the Validity of Legal Argument in Public International Law’ in Ulrich Fastenrath et al. (eds), From Bilateralism to Community Interest: Essays in Honour of Bruno Simma (Oxford University Press 2011) 58–78
Wilhelm G. Grewe, The Epochs of International Law (Michael Byers (tr.), Walter de Gruyter 2000)