11 - The relevance of State action to Articles 101 and 102 TFEU  pp. 343-378

The relevance of State action to Articles 101 and 102 TFEU

By Suzanne Kingston

Image View Previous Chapter Next Chapter



Introduction

While, as discussed in Chapter 2, private actors play an increasingly significant role in environmental policy and protection, Member States' role in reinforcing this role remains significant. Member States may, for example, seek to reinforce the effectiveness of voluntary environmental agreements by recognising them in law; or grant special rights to certain undertakings to perform environmental services that would not otherwise be profitable. This chapter deals with EU competition law's approach to these Member State efforts.

State action as a defence for undertakings

Where undertakings are required by national legislation to act in an anti-competitive manner, such undertakings may rely on their national law obligations as a defence to proceedings for breach of Articles 101 or 102 TFEU. This principle was laid down most famously in Ladbroke Racing, where the ECJ held that:

Articles [101 and 102] apply only to anti-competitive conduct engaged in by undertakings on their own initiative . . . If anti-competitive conduct is required of undertakings by national legislation or if the latter creates a legal framework which itself eliminates the possibility of competitive activity on their part, Articles [101 and 102] do not apply. In such a situation, the restriction of competition is not attributable, as those provisions implicitly require, to the autonomous conduct of the undertakings.

A. LotzeM. Reinhardt‘Die kartellrechtliche Missbrauchskontrolle bei Wasserpreisen – Anforderungen und Grenzen aus verfassungsrechtlicher, kartellrechtlicher und umweltverwaltungsrechtlicher Sicht’2009Neue Juristische Wochenschrift3273
A. Seinen‘State Aid for Hazardous Waste Treatment: The Case of AVR, the Netherlands’20053EC Competition Policy Newsletter97
C. Boutayeb‘Une recherche sur la place et les fonctions de l'intérêt general en droit communautaire’200339Revue trimestrielle de droit européen587
C. Le Bihan‘Services d'intérêt économique general et valeurs communes’2008Revue du Marché commun et de l'Union européenne356
C. Rizza‘The Duty of National Competition Authorities to Disapply Anti-Competitive Domestic Legislation and the Resulting Limitations on the Availability of the State Action Defence’2004European Competition Law Review126
E. Blomme‘State Action as a Defence Against 81 and 82 EC’200730World Competition243
E. Sartzetakis‘Raising Rivals’199712Review of Industrial Organization751
E. SzyszczakThe Regulation of the State in Competitive Markets in the EUOxfordHart Publishing2007
F. Castillo de la Torre‘State Action Defence in EC Competition Law’200528World Competition407
F. Vogelaar‘Towards an Improved Integration of EC Environmental Policy and EC Competition Policy: An Interim Report’B. HawkProceedings of the Fordham Corporate Law Institute 1995HuntingtonJuris Publishing1996554
G. Davies‘Article 86 EC, the EC's Economic Approach to Competition Law, and the General Interest’20095European Competition Journal549
G. Van Calster‘De Europese Verpakkingsrichtlijn: Oorsprong, Inhoud en Verhouding met het EG-Verdrag’K. DeketelaereA. Wiggers-RustActualiteiten Europees MilieurechtBruggeDie Keure1997
H. Schepel‘Delegation of Regulatory Powers to Private Parties under EC Competition Law; Towards a Procedural Public Interest Test’200239Common Market Law Review31
J. Baquero Cruz‘Beyond Competition: Services of General Interest and European Community Law’G. de BúrcaEU Law and the Welfare State: In Search of SolidarityOxfordOxford University Press2005
J. Baquero Cruz‘The State Action Doctrine’G. AmatoC.-D. EhlermannEC Competition Law: A Critical AssessmentOxfordHart Publishing2007
J. Buendia SierraExclusive Rights and State Monopolies under EC LawOxfordOxford University Press1999
J. FaullA. NikpayThe EC Law of CompetitionOxfordOxford University Press2007
J. V. LouisS. RodriguezLes services d'intérêt économique général et l'Union EuropéenneBrusselsBruylant2006
K. Mortelmans‘Towards Convergence in the Application of the Rules on Free Movement and on Competition?’200138Common Market Law Review613
M. KrajewskiU. NeergaardJ. van de GrondenThe Changing Legal Framework for Services of General Interest in EuropeThe Hague, T. M. C. Asser Press2009
M. Reinhardt‘Die kartellrechtliche Kontrolle der Wasserpreise aus rechtswissenschaftlicher Sicht’2010Landes- und Kommunalverwaltung145
M. ThunströmJ. CarleS. Lindeborg‘State Liability under the EC Treaty Arising from Anti-Competitive State Measures’200225World Competition515
S. Weishaar‘The European Emissions Trading System and Competition – Anti-Competitive Measures beyond Reach? An Assessment of the Grandfathering Allocation Method and the Performance Standard Rate System’2006European Competition Law Review371
S. WeishaarTowards Auctioning: The Transformation of the European Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading System: Present and Future Challenges to Competition LawAlphen aan den RijnKluwer2009
W. Sauter‘Services of General Interest and Universal Service in EU Law’200833European Law Review167