Edited by William C. McGrew
Edited by Linda F. Marchant
Edited by Toshisada Nishida
Foreword by Jane Goodall
Afterword by Junichiro Itani
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print Publication Year: 1996
Online Publication Date:August 2010
Chapter DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511752414.011
Twenty years ago, at the time of the first Wenner-Gren Symposium on the great apes held in 1974, chimpanzee sociology was still in its infancy. People believed that unlike other non-human primates, great apes were peaceful creatures (e.g. Montagu, 1968; Goodall, 1973), although between-group relationships were known to be antagonistic, at least among the chimpanzees of Mahale (Nishida & Kawanaka, 1972). As examples of agonistic aid, high-ranking males reportedly ran to help their ‘friends’ against the latters' rivals (Goodall, 1971) and some old males were known to take refuge with particular dominant males against the other males' displays (Simpson, 1973). However, complex coalition tactics were not known. The subsequent 20 years have seen a major breakthrough in chimpanzee sociology and politics.
Coalition is defined as two or more individuals joining forces against one or more conspecific rivals. Now, there are many examples of coalitions in mammals and birds (Connor et al., 1992; Harcourt, 1992). However, coalitions among chimpanzees, adult males in particular, are exceptional for their frequency, complexity and flexibility. Some coalitions are so persistent that one may well call them alliances (e.g. Riss & Goodall, 1977; Goodall, 1986). On the other hand, adult males sometimes show extreme opportunism, changing sides from moment to moment (de Waal, 1982; Nishida, 1983; Uehara et al., 1994). Some coalitions are direct, while others are indirect (de Waal, 1982).