3 - The rise of patent offices  pp. 91-113

The rise of patent offices

By Peter Drahos

Image View Previous Chapter Next Chapter



Patent statutes

We know much more about the history of patent law than we do about the history of its administration. The emergence of patent law in statutory form is generally said to be 1474 when the Venetian Republic passed a short decree that gave ten years of protection to any person who built ‘any new and ingenious device in this City’. The other early major statutory landmark is the English Statute of Monopolies of 1624. This statute crystallized the pronouncements of the common law courts concerning the use by the English Crown of its prerogative power to grant monopolies in business. Monopolies in general were declared to be void, but an exception was made for patents and grants of privilege for ‘any manner of new manufactures within this realm’.

The spread through Europe of a patent institution based on legislation that gave inventors rights under law as opposed to having to depend on the exercise of prerogative was a slow process. In France public rights of inventorship are linked to laws adopted by the National Assembly in 1790 and enacted in 1791. After this there is something of a take-off in Europe of patent statutes: Austria 1810, Russia 1812, Prussia 1815, Belgium and the Netherlands 1817, Spain 1820, Bavaria 1825, Sweden 1834, Wurtemburg 1836, Portugal 1837, Saxonia, 1843.

Outside of Europe, the First Congress of the United States passed a patent statute in 1790.

A. Gomme, Patents of Invention: Origin and Growth of the Patent System in Britain, Longmans, London, 1946
Bruce W. Bugbee, Genesis of American Patent and Copyright Law, Public Affairs Press, Washington, DC, 1967
Christine MacLeod, Inventing the Industrial Revolution: The English Patent System, 1660–1800, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988, 41
Christine MaCleod, Jennifer Tan, James Andrew and Jeremy Stein, ‘Evaluating Inventive Activity: The Cost of Nineteenth-century UK Patents and the Fallibility of Renewal Data’, 3 (2003) Economic History Review, 537, 540
Daniel Fitzpatrick, ‘Evolution and Chaos in Property Rights Systems: The Third World Tragedy of Contested Access’, 115 (2006) Yale Law Journal, 996
E. Wyndham Hulme, ‘On the History of Patent Law in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries’, 18 (1902) Law Quarterly Review, 280
Eric Schiff, Industrialization without National Patents, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1971
Eric Schiff, Industrialization without National Patents, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1971, 93
Frank D. Prager, ‘A History of Intellectual Property From 1545 to 1787’, 26 (1944) Journal of the Patent Office Society, 711
Frank D. Prager, ‘A History of Intellectual Property From 1545 to 1787’, 26 (1944) Journal of the Patent Office Society, 711, 734
Frank D. Prager, ‘Brunelleschi's Patent’, 28 (1946) Journal of the Patent Office Society, 109, 127–8
Fritz Machlup and Edith Penrose, ‘The Patent Controversy in the Nineteenth Century’, 10 (1950) Journal of Economic History, 1
G. Doorman, ‘Patent Law in the Netherlands’, Part I, 30 (1948) Journal of the Patent Office Society, 225, 228
G. Doorman, ‘Patent Law in the Netherlands’, Part III, 30 (1948) Journal of the Patent Office Society, 347
G. Doorman, ‘Patent Law in the Netherlands, Part I’, 30 (1948) Journal of the Patent Office Society, 225
Georg Meyer-Thurow, ‘The Industrialization of Invention: A Case Study From the German Chemical Industry’, 73 (1982) Isis, 363
Giulio Mandich, ‘Venetian Origins of Inventors’ Rights', 42 (1960) Journal of the Patent Office Society, 378
Giulio Mandich, ‘Venetian Origins of Inventors’ Rights', 42 (1960) Journal of the Patent Office Society, 378, 380
Giulio Mandich, ‘Venetian Patents (1450–1550)’, 30 (1948) Journal of the Patent Office Society, 166
Giulio Mandich, ‘Venetian Patents (1450–1550)’, 30 (1948) Journal of the Patent Office Society, 166, 173
H. G. Fox, Monopolies and Patents: A Study of the History and Future of the Patent Monopoly, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 1947
Herbert A. Simon, Administrative Behavior, Macmillan Company, New York, 1951, 95–6
J. P. Murmann, Knowledge and Competitive Advantage: The Coevolution of Firms, Technology, and National Institutions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003
J.M. Roberts, Europe: 1880–1945, Longman, London and New York, 105
Jan Vojacek, A Survey of the Principal National Patent Systems, Prentice-Hall, NY, 1936
Jan Vojacek, A Survey of the Principal National Patent Systems, Prentice-Hall, NY, 1936, 116
Kenneth L. Sokoloff, ‘Inventive Activity in Early Industrial America: Evidence From Patent Records, 1790–1846’, 48 (1988) Journal of Economic History, 813, 818
Lawrence C. Kingsland, ‘The United States Patent Office’, 13 (1948) Law and Contemporary Problems, 354, 359
Moureen Coulter, Property in Ideas: The Patent Question in Mid-Victorian Britain, Thomas Jefferson University Press, Kirksville, Missouri, 1991
P. J. Federico, ‘Operation of the Patent Act of 1790’, 18 (1936) Journal of the Patent Office Society, 237
Robert C. Post, ‘ “Liberalizers” versus “Scientific Men” in the Antebellum Patent Office’, 17 (1976) Technology and Culture, 24
Robert C. Post, ‘ “Liberalizers” versus “Scientific Men” in the Antebellum Patent Office’, 17 (1976) Technology and Culture, 24
Stephen P. Ladas, Patents, Trademarks, and Related Rights: National and International Protection, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass., 1975
Stephen P. Ladas, The International Protection of Industrial Property, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass., 1930
W.C. Robinson, ‘Money, Population and Economic Change in Late Medieval Europe’, 12 (1959) Economic History Review (New Series), 63
Warren C. Scoville, ‘State Policy and the French Glass Industry, 1640–1789’, 56 (1942) Quarterly Journal of Economics, 430, 437
Zachary Elkins and Beth Simmons, ‘On Waves, Clusters, and Diffusion: A Conceptual Framework’, 598 (2005) The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 33