12 - The personal and political of volunteers' data: towards a national biodiversity database for the UK  pp. 251-265

The personal and political of volunteers' data: towards a national biodiversity database for the UK

By Anna Lawrence

Image View Previous Chapter Next Chapter



Britain has an exceptional tradition of natural history societies and amateur naturalists who collect data about species distributions, frequency and behaviour (Bell et al., this volume). This chapter examines an attempt to harness the data for a wider range of purposes, and the ways in which different actors have perceived and responded to this. Many of the volunteers have a strong personal attachment to their data, and to the ways in which they hope that it will be used. When powerful organizations become involved in managing the data, the volunteers can perceive threats and opportunities for the value of their data. The chapter considers the need to balance these emotional and political aspects in developing an effective national data management system. It is based on a cross-cutting analysis of research into the processes behind biodiversity action plans and biological recording, conducted over several years in the UK (Gillett and Lawrence, 2003; Lawrence, 2005; Lawrence, 2006; Lawrence and Molteno in press; Lawrence and Turnhout, 2005). The chapter draws on interviews with volunteers and professionals involved in the complex organizational landscape that has evolved around biological data collection and sharing, descriptions of the process on websites and in reports, and on presentations made at the annual National Biodiversity Network conferences.

The supply side: growth of biological recording

Biological recording, or the collection of data about the distribution and abundance of species, has a long history in Britain, going back to the leisure time of country vicars in the eighteenth century (Moss, 2004).

Battersby, J. E. and J. J. D. Greenwood . (2004). Monitoring terrestrial mammals in the UK: past, present and future, using lessons from the bird world. Mammal Review 34, 3–29.
Biodiversity Scotland (2008). Biodiversity Duty for Public Bodies. Scottish Government. Available at http://www.biodiversityscotland.gov.uk/pageType2.php?id=6&type=2&navID=28
Bowler, P. (2003). Identity crisis. In The Guardian, pp. 8–9. London.
BRISC (2006). Biological Recording in Scotland: Strategic Business Plan 2006 – 2016. Available at: http://www.brisc.org.uk/StrategicPlan06–16.pdf.
Burnett, J. , C. Copp , and P. Harding (1995). Biological Recording in the UK: Present Practice and Future Development. Coordinating Commission for Biological Recording. Ruislip, England.
DEFRA (2006a). Biodiversity Indicators – Working with the Grain of Nature – Taking it Forward: Volume II. Measuring Progress on the England Biodiversity Strategy: 2006 Assessment. London: DEFRA. Available at: http://www.parliament.uk/documents/upload/postpn312.pdf.
DEFRA (2006b). The UK Biodiversity Action Plan: Highlights of the 2005 Reporting Round. Available at: http://www.defra.gov.uk/wildlife-countryside/pdfs/biodiversity/uk-bap-report.pdf#search=%22lbaps%20reporting%20round%202005%22.
DEFRA (2007a). Conserving Biodiversity in a Changing Climate: Guidance on Building Capacity to Adapt. London: DEFRA. Available at: http://www.ukbap.org.uk/Library/BRIG/CBCCGuidance.pdf.
DEFRA (2007b). Environmental Information Regulations: Exceptions. Available at http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/opengov/eir/guidance/full-guidance/pdf/guidance-7.pdf
DEFRA (2007c). Guidance for Public Authorities on Implementing the Biodiversity Duty. Available at http://www.defra.gov.uk/wildlife-countryside/pdfs/biodiversity/pa-guid-english.pdf
Firbank, L. G. , C. J. Barr , R. G. H. Bunce et al. (2003). Assessing stock and change in land cover and biodiversity in GB: an introduction to Countryside Survey 2000. Journal of Environmental Management 67, 207–218.
Flowerdew, J. R. (2004). Advances in the conservation of British mammals, 1954–2004: 50 years of progress with the Mammal Society. Mammal Review 34, 169–210.
Gillett, S. and A. Lawrence , editors (2003). Why Involve Volunteers in Biodiversity Monitoring? Summary of the BioWatch UK workshop, 20th October 2003. BioWatch UK Workshop. Oxford, UK. Available at: http://www.eci.ox.ac.uk/research/humaneco/biowatch.php
Gouveia, C. , A. Fonseca , A. Camara , and F. Ferreira (2004). Promoting the use of environmental data collected by concerned citizens through information and communication technologies. Journal of Environmental Management 71, 135–154.
Greenwood, J. J. D. (2003). The monitoring of British breeding birds: a success story for conservation science? Science of the Total Environment 310, 221–230.
Hartley, N. and C. Wood . (2005). Public participation in environmental impact assessment – implementing the Aarhus Convention. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25, 319–340.
Hopkins, G. W. and R. P. Freckleton (2002). Declines in the numbers of amateur and professional taxonomists: implications for conservation. Animal Conservation 5, 245–249.
Key, R. S. (1993). The use of biological records to protect a Thames grazing marsh of national importance for invertebrates. In The Proceedings of the NFBR Conference: Crises and Biological Records, eds. A. Spalding and C. French , pp. 20–22. Redruth, Cornwall: Institute of Cornish Studies, University of Exeter.
Lawrence, A. (2005). Reluctant citizens? The disjuncture between participatory biological monitoring and participatory environmental governance. Paper presented at the International Sociology Conference ‘Environment, Knowledge and Democracy’ 6–7 July 2005, Faculte des Sciences de Luminy, Marseilles, 2005. Available at: http://www.eci.ox.ac.uk/research/humaneco/downloads/lawrence_marseille.PDF
Lawrence, A. (2006). “No Personal Motive?” Volunteers, biodiversity and the false dichotomies of participation. Ethics, Place and Environment 9, 279–298.
Lawrence, A. and E. Turnhout (2005). Personal meaning in the public space: the bureaucratization of biodiversity data in the UK and the Netherlands. RGS-IBG Annual Conference, London, 2005.
Lawrence, A. and S. Molteno , in press. From rationalism to reflexivity? Reflections on change in the UK Biodiversity Action Plan. In Reflexive Governance for Global Public Goods, eds. E. Brousseau , T. Dedeurwaerdere and B. Siebenhüner. MIT Press.
Moss, S. (2004). A Bird in the Bush: a Social History of Birdwatching. London: Aurum.
NBN (2006). The NBN concept, vol. 2007. Available at www.nbn.org.uk
NFBR (2002). The Status of Local Records Centres in the UK, 2002. National Federation for Biological Recording. Available at www.nfbr.org.uk
NFBR (2004). LRCs and the Draft Environmental Information Regulations Code of Practice. National Federation of Biological Recording. Available at www.nfbr.org.uk/html/lrcs.html
Nicholson, E. (1931). The Art of Bird-Watching. London: Witherby.
Palmer, C. (2004). Functions of museums and record centres and how they have changed. Paper presented at the NFBR Conference. National Federation of Biological Recorders Conference, 2–3 July 2004, Cardiff, 2004.
Preston, C. D. , M. G. Telfer , H. R. Arnold et al. (2002). The Changing Flora of the UK. London: DEFRA. Available at: www.defra.gov.uk/wildlife-countryside/ewd/flora/FlorainUK.pdf
Warren, R. D. and M. S. Witter . (2002). Monitoring trends in bat populations through roost surveys: methods and data from Rhinolophus hipposideros. Biological Conservation 105, 255–261.