5 - Taking stock of nature in species-rich but economically poor areas: an emerging discipline of locally based monitoring  pp. 88-112

Taking stock of nature in species-rich but economically poor areas: an emerging discipline of locally based monitoring

By Finn Danielsen et al.

Image View Previous Chapter Next Chapter


Conventional scientist-executed forms of monitoring are expensive and rely upon highly skilled scientists or technicians (Danielsen et al., 2000). As such only a small amount of this type of monitoring is undertaken in developing countries, where funding and available expertise are limited. This is unfortunate as the developing countries have the greatest importance globally in terms of their assemblages of species, including those threatened by extinction, and also have a great diversity of habitats and important ecosystem services (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005). They are also the parts of the world where habitat loss is currently proceeding at the greatest speed, and where we know least about the trends in species abundance (Balmford, Green and Jenkins, 2003; IUCN, 2007).

Recently, experiments have been made to involve less educated local people in monitoring of natural resources in developing countries. Although there are still a number of scientific questions surrounding these approaches, and many schemes are still at an early stage of development, the new approaches show a great deal of promise (Danielsen, Burgess and Balmford, 2005a; Danielsen, Burgess and Balmford, 2005c). This chapter analyses the success and challenges of four schemes that stand out from the majority, because they have been replicated and scaled-up, and are now institutionalized and adopted nationally in the respective countries. We begin by describing and explaining the activities and outcomes for each of the four schemes, before presenting our own cross-cutting analysis of the benefits and challenges of such approaches.

Akida, A. (2007). What is the National Forestry and Beekeeping Database? The Arc Journal 21 (September 2007), 34–35.
Balmford, A. , Green, R. E. and Jenkins, M. (2003). Measuring the changing state of nature. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18, 326–330.
Bibby C. J. , Burgess, N. D. , Hill, D. A. and Mustoe, S. (2000). Bird Census Techniques: 2nd edition. London: Academic Press, 350 pp.
Blomley, T and Ramadhani, H . (2006). Going to scale with Participatory Forest Management: early lessons from Tanzania. International Forestry Review 8, 93–100.
Blomley, T. (2006). Mainstreaming participatory forestry within the local government reform process in Tanzania. Gatekeeper Series 128. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
Brashares, J. S. (2003). Behavioral, ecological, and life-history correlates of mammal extinctions in West Africa. Conservation Biology 17, 733–743.
Brashares, J. S. , Arcese, P. , Sam, M. K. et al. (2004). Bushmeat hunting, wildlife declines and fish supply in West Africa. Science 306, 1180–1183.
Brashares, J. S. , Arcese, P. and Sam, M. K. (2001). Human demography and reserve size predict wildlife extinction in West Africa. Proceedings Royal Society of London B 268, 2473–2478.
Brashares, J. S. and Arcese, P. (2002). Role of forage, habitat and predation in the behavioral plasticity of a small African antelope. Journal of Animal Ecology 71, 626–638.
Brashares, J. S. and Sam, M. K. (2005). How much is enough? Estimating the minimum sampling required for effective monitoring of African reserves. Biodiversity and Conservation 14, 2709–2722. Available at www.monitoringmatters.org/articles/full10.pdf.
Côté, I. M. , Gill, J. A. , Gardner, T. A. and Watkinson, A. R. (2005). Measuring coral reef decline through meta-analysis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 360, 385–395.
Danielsen, F. , Balete, D. S. , Poulsen, M. K. et al. (2000). A simple system for monitoring biodiversity in protected areas of a developing country. Biodiversity and Conservation 9, 1671–1705.
Danielsen, F. , Burgess, N. D. , Balmford, A. et al. (2009). Local participation in natural resource monitoring: a characterization of approaches. Conservation Biology 23, 31–42. Available at http://www.monitoringmatters.org/cases.htm
Danielsen, F. , Burgess, N. D. and Balmford, A. (2005a). Monitoring matters: examining the potential of locally-based approaches. Biodiversity and Conservation 14, 2507–2542. Available at www.monitoringmatters.org/articles/full1.pdf.
Danielsen, F. , Burgess, N. D. and Balmford, A. (eds.) (2005c). Monitoring matters: examining the potential of locally-based approaches. Fifteen case studies presented in Special issue of Biodiversity and Conservation 14, (11), Available at http://www.monitoringmatters.org/cases.htm
Danielsen, F. , Jensen, A. E. , Alviola, P. A. et al. (2005b). Does monitoring matter? A quantitative assessment of management decisions from locally-based monitoring of protected areas. Biodiversity and Conservation 14, 2633–2652. Available at www.monitoringmatters.org/articles/full6.pdf.
Danielsen, F. , Mendoza, M. M. , Tagtag, A. et al. (2007). Increasing conservation management action by involving local stakeholders in natural resource monitoring. Ambio 36, 566–570.
DENR (2000). Guidelines on the Implementation of the Biodiversity Monitoring System (BMS) in Protected Areas. Department of Environment and Natural Resources Administrative Order No. 2000–13. Quezon City, The Philippines: DENR, Diliman.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) (1992). National Integrated Protected Area System Act R. A. No. 7586 and Implementing Rules and Regulations DAO 25, Series of 1992. Manila, The Philippines: DENR, PAWB.
Ghana Wildlife Division (2000). Wildlife Division Policy for Collaborative Community Based Wildlife Management. Accra, Ghana: Ministry of Forestry, 11pp.
Gurevitch, J. , Curtis, P. S. and Jones, M. H. (2001). Meta-analysis in ecology. Advances in Ecological Research 32, 199–247.
IUCN (2007). 2007 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Available at www.iucnredlist.org
Loh, J. , Green, R. E. , Ricketts, T. et al. (2005). The Living Planet Index: using species population time series to track trends in biodiversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 360, 289–295.
Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis Report. Washington D.C: Island Press.
Poulsen, M. K. , Massao, J. , Burgess, N. and Topp-Jørgensen, E. (2007). Community based monitoring of PFM in Tanzania: initial experiences and lessons learned. The Arc Journal 21, 31–33.
Stuart-Hill, G. , Diggle, R. , Munali, B. , Tagg, J. and Ward, D. (2005). The Event Book System: a community based natural resource monitoring system from Namibia. Biodiversity and Conservation 14, 2611–2631. Available at www.monitoringmatters.org/articles/full5.pdf.
Topp-Jørgensen, E. , Poulsen, M. K. , Lund, J. F. and Massao, J. F. (2005). Community-based monitoring of natural resource use and forest quality in montane forests and miombo woodlands in Iringa District, Tanzania. Biodiversity and Conservation 14, 2653–2677. Available at www.monitoringmatters.org/articles/full7.pdf.
United Republic of Tanzania (2007). National Forest and Beekeeping Programme Monitoring Database (NAFOBEDA) Version 2.8. Monitoring Manual – Monitoring Procedures. Tanzania: Forestry and Beekeeping Division, Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism.
Uychiaoco, A. J. , Arceo, H. O. , Green, S. J. et al. (2005). Monitoring and evaluation of reef protected areas by local fishers in the Philippines: tightening the adaptive management cycle. Biodiversity and Conservation 14, 2775–2794. Available at www.monitoringmatters.org/articles/full14.pdf.
Wily, L. A. (2000). Forest law in Eastern and Southern Africa. Moving towards a community based forest future? Unasylva 203, 29 pp.
Yoccoz, N. G. , Nichols, J. D. and Boulinier, T. (2003). Monitoring of biological diversity – a response to Danielsen et al . Oryx 37, 410.