Chapter 27 - Teaching Strategic Reading  pp. 287-294

Teaching Strategic Reading

By Joy Janzen

Image View Previous Chapter Next Chapter



Mircea is a conscientious student. When he is told he will be tested on the contents of Chapter 2 in the textbook, he looks up every unknown word in the dictionary in an effort to fix the information in his memory. Despite his extended preparations, he doesn't do very well on the test, though he says he spent hours preparing. Lia, on the other hand, excels on the exam, but she has approached the text in a very different way. Before she reads the chapter, she skims through it, looking at subheadings and graphics so as to give herself a general idea of what the text will be about. As she reads, she connects the material in the chapter to what she already knows. She frequently asks herself questions about the text, looking back or ahead to link one part of the text to another. When she is puzzled by the content, she searches for clues in the context, tries to paraphrase, or considers what she knows about text structure. In short, Lia is reading like an expert, while Mircea is relying on just one technique. The difference between the two is in their use of reading strategies.

IMPLICATIONS OF READING STRATEGY RESEARCH FOR TEACHERS

Reading strategies can be defined as “plans for solving problems encountered in constructing meaning” (Duffy, 1993, p. 232).

Beard El-Dinary, P., Pressley, M., & Schuder, T. (1992). Teachers learning transactional strategies instruction. In C. Kinzer & D. Leu (Eds.), Literary research, theory, and practice: Views from many perspectives: Forty-first yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 453–462). Chicago: National Reading Conference
Block, E . (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 46392
Block, E . (1992). See how they read: Comprehension monitoring of L1 and L2 readers. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 319–342
Brown, A., & Palincsar, A. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowledge, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 393– 451). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Carrell, P . (1985). Facilitating ESL reading by teaching text structure. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 727–752
Carrell, P. , Pharis, B. G. , & Liberto, J. C. (1989). Metacognitive strategy training for ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 647–678
Chamot, A. U., & O'Malley, M. (1994). The CALLA handbook. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
Cotterall, S . (1990). Developing reading strategies through small-group interaction. RELC Journal, 21, 55–69
Duffy, G . (1993). Rethinking strategy instruction: Four teachers' development and their low achievers' understandings. Elementary School Journal, 93, 231–247
Gaskins, I. (1994). Classroom applications of cognitive science: Teaching poor readers how to learn, think, and problem solve. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 129–154). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Hewitt, G . (1995). Toward student autonomy in reading: Reciprocal teaching. English Teaching Forum, 33, 29–30
Jimenez, R. , Garcia, G. , & Pearson, P. (1995). Three children, two languages, and strategic reading: Case studies in bilingual/monolingual reading. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 67–97
Pearson, P. D., & Fielding, L. (1991). Comprehension instruction. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 11; pp. 815–860). White Plains, NY: Longman
Powers, T. (1989). Special effects in the movies. San Diego: Lucent Books
Pressley, M., Beard El-Dinary, P., & Brown, R. (1992). Skilled and not-so-skilled reading: Good information processing and not-so-good information processing. In M. Pressley, K. Harris, & J. Guthrie (Eds.), Promoting academic competence and literacy in schools (pp. 91–127). San Diego: Academic Press