“Language” and intelligence in monkeys and apes
Comparative Developmental Perspectives
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print Publication Year: 1990
Online Publication Date:May 2010
Chapter DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665486.012
One of the most exciting findings to emerge from recent observations of freeranging chimpanzees in equatorial Africa is that different populations behave differently: They eat different foods, use different tools, and communicate in different ways. These differences seem to persist across generations, and their geographical distribution (neighbors often differ more than do populations living a continent apart) makes it unlikely that they are due to genetic factors. Some researchers have therefore taken to speaking of chimpanzee “culture” (e.g., Goodall, 1973, 1986; McGrew, 1983; McGrew & Tutin, 1978; McGrew, Tutin, & Baldwin, 1979; Nishida, 1980; Nishida, Wrangham, Goodall, & Uehara, 1983; Sugiyama, 1985).
It is clear, however, that not all population differences are cultural in origin. Although the term culture is not easy to define, either when applied to human societies (e.g., White, 1959) or when applied to animal populations (e.g., Booner, 1980; Mainardi, 1980; Washburn & Benedict, 1979), at the very least culture would seem to require some form of social learning. Thus, no one would claim cultural transmission if all members of a population learned a particular behavior only because they each had been exposed to the same set of contingencies from the physical environment. For example, naturalistic observations have revealed that one population of wild rats dives into the Po River (in Italy) for mollusks, whereas another population of rats living on that same river does not.