Cooperating for Peace and Security
Evolving Institutions and Arrangements in a Context of Changing U.S. Security Policy
Edited by Bruce D. Jones
Edited by Shepard Forman
Edited by Richard Gowan
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print Publication Year: 2009
Online Publication Date:January 2010
Chapter DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642395.014
The act of extending aid to foreign peoples in crisis may be as old as the nation-state system itself. The cooperative institutions of international humanitarian aid are young, however, and they comprise a relatively new sphere of international cooperation. The current network of state and nonstate entities that allows for the large-scale delivery of relief aid came into being less than two decades ago.
This chapter explores the evolving institutions of the international humanitarian system as they relate to the shifting security landscape and U.S. political priorities. Overwhelmingly the world's largest humanitarian donor, the United States has in effect always carried, but at no time led, the international system for humanitarian response. Its engagement over the years is characterized by a steady permissiveness, and a tendency to observe and follow trends rather than drive institutional and policy change. At the same time, a leadership mantle in humanitarian institution building has been taken up by Great Britain, which seems to have found a niche in this issue-area to promote a values-based agenda and advance its policy goals in the developing world. As put forward in this chapter, impartial humanitarian assistance may in fact depend on the United States keeping to its more modest role.
The modern history of international humanitarian action includes a post–Cold War boom and crisis, followed by early reform and institution building; and later a second phase of reform that took on a United Nations (UN)-centric emphasis on strategic coherence for peacekeeping and peacebuilding objectives.