The Constitution and America's Destiny
Constituting Policy Agency
By David Brian Robertson
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print Publication Year: 2005
Online Publication Date:November 2009
Chapter DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610622.006
No issue tore at the Constitutional Convention more than the problem of choosing and controlling those who would govern. Virginia's plan directly challenged the equal state representation already established in the Confederation Congress. Madison and his allies insisted that the states' relative size, not their equal status as states, should determine their relative influence in national policy making. He also sought to eradicate as much state government influence over policy makers as possible. Madison's bold challenge to their existing political defenses galvanized the delegates from the vulnerable middle and northern states. Their delegates united to defend their states' influence in national policy decisions.
The issue of proportional representation in Congress dominated the convention's first month and a half. Sherman and his allies stopped the momentum of Madison's plan, cast his central premises in doubt, refocused the terms of the debate on material interests, and chipped away at his support. Once the delegates accepted the political compromise providing equal state representation in the Senate and proportional representation in the House of Representatives in mid-July, the struggle over policy agency shifted to other agency choices. Madison battled vigorously to give the president the independence to pursue future national interests, and fought to limit the powers of the Senate, now seen as the agent of state governments. Ultimately, the selection of the president was settled by another political compromise on presidential election and power.