5 - Atmospheric Trust Litigation  pp. 99-126

Atmospheric Trust Litigation

By Mary Christina Wood

Image View Previous Chapter Next Chapter



INTRODUCTION

This chapter outlines the contours of potential “atmospheric trust litigation,” designed to provide a means by which courts can hold governments at the national and subnational level accountable for reducing carbon emissions. Such litigation rests on the premise that all governments hold natural resources in trust for their citizens and bear the fiduciary obligation to protect such resources for future generations. The trust is embedded in the law as an attribute of sovereignty itself. While most frequently applied to state governments, public trust theory applies with equal force to the federal government, and seemingly indeed, to any sovereign. Atmospheric trust litigation would characterize the atmosphere as one of the assets in the trust, shared as property among all nations of the world as co-tenants.

Protection of the trust through judicial oversight lies at the heart of the public trust jurisprudence in this country. As this chapter explains, the courts have the ability to enforce a fiduciary obligation to reduce carbon at all levels of government. Whether they will do so or not depends largely on individual judges' perception of the urgency of climate crisis, their belief as to whether the political system will address the issue, and their view of the role of the judiciary in confronting climate change. While atmospheric trust litigation bears the risk of any untested strategy, it is perhaps the only macro approach that can empower courts to effectuate the reductions in emissions within the limited time frame afforded to us before critical climate thresholds are exceeded.

Allen Kanner, The Public Trust Doctrine, Parens Patriae, and the Attorney General as the Guardian of the State's Natural Resources, 16 Duke Envtl. L. & Pol'y F. 57 (2005)
Burns Weston, Climate Change and Intergenerational Justice: Foundational Reflections, 9 Vt. J. Envtl. L. (2008)
Carter H. Strickland, Jr., The Scope of Authority of Natural Resource Trustees, 20 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 301, pt. III.A (1995)
Charles B. Anderson, Damage to Natural Resources and the Costs of Restoration, 72 Tul. L. Rev. 417, pt. III (1997)
Charles L. Wilkinson, The Public Trust Doctrine in Public Land Law, 14 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 269, 315 (1980)
Colin Woodard, In Greenland, An Interfaith Rally for Climate Change, Christian Sci. Monitor, Sept. 12, 2007
Costanza et al., The Value of the World's Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital, Nature 387, 253 (May 15, 1997)
David Adam, Ten-Year Warming Window Closing, Sydney Morning Herald (May 12, 2007)
Deborah G. Musiker et al., The Public Trust and Parens Patriae Doctrines: Protecting Wildlife in Uncertain Political Times, 16 Pub. Land L. Rev. 87 (1995)
Deepa Badrinarayana, The Emerging Constitutional Challenge of Climate Change: India in Perspective, 19 Fordham Envtl. L.J. 1, n. 137 (2009)
Gail Osherenko, New Discourses on Ocean Governance: Understanding Property Rights and the Public Trust, 21 J. Envtl. L. & Litig. 317, 327 (2006)
Gary D. Meyers, Variation on a Theme: Expanding the Public Trust Doctrine to Include Protection of Wildlife, 19 Envtl. L. 723, 728 (1989)
Gary T. Schwartz, The Beginning and the Possible End of the Rise of Modern American Tort Law, 26 Ga. L. Rev. 601 (2001)
Gerald Torres, Who Owns the Sky? 19 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 515, 525 (2002)
Gerald W. Boston, Apportionment of Harm in Tort Law: A Proposed Restatement, 21 Dayton L. Rev. 267 (1996)
Harrison Dunning, The Public Trust: A Fundamental Doctrine of American Property Law, 19 Envtl. L. 515 (Spring 1989)
James E. Hansen, A Brighter Future, 52 Climatic Change 435, 438 (2002)
James Hansen et al., Climate Change and Trace Gases, Phil. Trans. Royal Soc'y A, 1925, 1939 (2007)
Jeffery J. Matthews, Clean Water Act Citizen Suit Requests for Municipal Moratoria: Anatomy of a Sewer Hookup Moratorium Law Suit, 14 J. Envtl. L. & Litig. 25 (1999)
Joseph L. Sax, The Public Trust Doctrine in Natural Resource Law: Effective Judicial Intervention, 68 Mich. L. Rev. 471, 558–66 (1970)
Karen Butler Reisinger, Court-Appointed Expert Panels: A Comparison of Two Models, 32 Ind. L. Rev. 225 (1998)
Mary Christina Wood, Government's Atmospheric Trust Responsibility, 22 J. Envtl. L. & Litig. 369, 374 (2008)
Mary Christina Wood, Nature's Trust: Reclaiming an Environmental Discourse, 25 Va. Envtl. L.J. 243 (2007)
Mary Christina Wood, Protecting the Wildlife Trust: A Reinterpretation of Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, 34 Envtl. L. 605, n.38 and accompanying text (2004)
Mary Christina Wood, Reclaiming the Natural Rivers: The Endangered Species Act Applied to Endangered River Ecosystems, 40 Ariz. L. Rev. 197, 233 (1998)
Mary Christina Wood, Restoring the Abundant Trust: Tribal Litigation in Pacific Northwest Salmon Recovery, 36 Envtl. L. Rep. 10,163, 10,176–77 (2006)
Mary Christina Wood, The Tribal Property Right to Wildlife Capital (Part I): Applying Principals of Sovereignty to Protect Imperiled Wildlife Populations, 37 Idaho L. Rev. 1, 58–59, 92–93 (2000)
Mary Christina Wood, The Tribal Property Right to Wildlife Capital (Part II): Asserting a Sovereign Servitude to Protect Habitat of Imperiled Species, 25 Vt. L. Rev. 355, 443 (2001)
Peter H. Sand, Sovereignty Bounded: Public Trusteeship for Common Pool Resources, 4 Global Envtl. Pol. 47, 55 (2004)
Robin Kundis Craig, A Comparative Guide to the Eastern Public Trust Doctrine: Classifications of States, Property Rights, and State Summaries, 16 Penn St. Envt'l L. Rev. 1 (2007)
Samuel H. Jackson, Technical Advisors Deserve Equal Billing with Court Appointed Experts in Novel and Complex Scientific Cases: Does the Federal Judicial Center Agree?, 28 Envtl. L. 431 (1998)
Seth Borenstein, Texas, Wyoming Take Lead in Emissions, USA Today (June 2, 2007)
Susan Morath Horner, Embryo, Not Fossil: Breathing Life into the Public Trust in Wildlife, 35 Land & Water L. Rev. 23, 27–28 (2000)
Thomas A. Campbell, The Public Trust, What's It Worth?, 34 Nat. Resources J. 73, 82–86 (1994)
Ved P. Nanda & William K. Ris, Jr., The Public Trust Doctrine: A Viable Approach to International Environmental Protection, 5 Ecology L.Q. 291, 306 (1976)
Zygmunt J.B. Plater et al., Environmental Law and Policy: Nature, Law, and Society 1103 (Erwin Chemerinsky et al. eds., Aspen Publishers, 3d ed. 2004)