13 - What have we learned about emerging-market MNEs?  pp. 399-426

What have we learned about emerging-market MNEs?

By Ravi Ramamurti

Image View Previous Chapter Previous Chapter



We began this project with three research questions: What competitive advantages do EMNEs leverage as they internationalize, and how are those advantages shaped by the home-country context? How do EMNEs internationalize, and why? And, how is the rise of EMNEs affecting global industry dynamics? Underlying those questions was the theoretical question of whether existing IB frameworks are adequate to explain EMNE behavior, and if not, how they should be modified or extended.

The studies in Part II show clearly that EMNEs are not a homogeneous group by any means. The countries from which they hail, the industries in which they operate, the competitive advantages they exploit, the markets they target, and the internationalization paths they follow vary quite widely. The evidence does not permit sweeping generalizations about EMNEs nor about how they are different from MNEs that came before, because the latter is also a heterogeneous group.

Equally important, EMNEs have internationalized in a different international context than MNEs that came before, including even Japanese and Korean MNEs, and this makes inter-temporal comparisons even more difficult. Since the 1990s, the international policy environment and the technological environment have changed profoundly. Domestic and foreign markets were more open in this period than in earlier decades, following the collapse of Communism, the conclusion of the Uruguay Round trade deal, and the creation of the WTO.

Amsden, A. and Wan-wen Chu. 2003. Beyond late development: Taiwan's upgrading policies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bartlett, Christopher A. and Sumantra Ghoshal. 1989. Managing across borders. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Buckley, Peter J., L. Jeremy Clegg, Adam R. Cross, Xin Liu, Hinrich Voss, and Ping Zheng. 2007. The determinants of Chinese outward foreign investment. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 38, No. 4 (July): 499–518.
Cheng, Joseph L. 2007. Critical issues in international management research: An agenda for future advancement. European Journal of Management, Vol. 1, Nos. 1–2: 23–38.
Eden, Lorraine. 2003. A critical reflection and some conclusions on OLI. In John Cantwell and Rajneesh Narula (eds.), International business and the eclectic paradigm: Developing the OLI framework. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 277–297.
Evans, Philip and Thomas S. Wurster. 2000. Blown to bits: How the new economy of information transforms strategy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Farmoohand, Ali F. and Phoebe Ho. 2006. Huwaei: Cisco's Chinese challenger. Hong Kong: Asia Case Research Center, The University of Hong Kong, Case No. HKU 599.
Farrell, Diana, Christian S. Folster, and Susan Lund. 2008. Long-term trends in the global capital market. McKinsey Quarterly (February).
Friedman, Thomas L. 2005. The world is flat. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Ghemawat, Pankaj. 2007a. Why the world isn't flat. Foreign Policy, No. 159 (March/April): 54–60.
Ghemawat, Pankaj. 2007b. Redefining global strategy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Huang, Yasheng. 2003. Selling China: Foreign direct investment during the reform era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hymer, Stephen. 1976. The international operation of national firms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Khanna, T. and Krishna Palepu. 2005. Spotting institutional voids in emerging markets. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing, Note No. 9–106–014.
Khanna, Tarun and Krishna Palepu. 2006. Emerging giants: Building world-class companies in developing countries. Harvard Business Review (October).
Knight, Gary A. and S. Tamer Cavusgil. 1996. The born-global firm: A challenge to traditional internationalization theory. In Tage Koed Madsen (ed.), Advances in International Marketing, Vol. 8. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 11–26.
Kogut, Bruce. 1985. Designing global strategies: Profiting from operational flexibility. Sloan Management Review, Vol. 27, No. 1: 27–38.
Lall, Sanjaya (ed.). 1983. The new multinationals: The spread of Third World enterprises. Chichester, UK, and New York: John Wiley, IRM series on multinationals.
Lecraw, D. 1977. Direct investment by firms from less-developed countries. Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 29, No. 3 (November): 442–457.
Luo, Yadong and Rosalie L. Tung. 2007. International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 38, No. 4: 481–498.
Mathews, John. 2002. Dragon multinationals: A new model for global growth. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Meyer, Klaus E. 2006. Asian management research needs more self-confidence. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol. 23, No. 2: 119–137.
Michaels, Ed, Helen Handfield-Jones, and Beth Axelrod. 2001. The war for talent. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Narula, Rajneesh. 2006. Globalization, new ecologies, new zoologies, and the purported death of the eclectic paradigm. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol. 23, No. 3 (June): 143–152.
Palmisano, Sam. 2006. Leading, trust, and the globally integrated enterprise. Speech delivered at INSEAD Business School, Fontainebleu, France (October).
Porter, Michael E. 1986. Competition in global industries. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Rivkin, Jan. 2000. Imitation of complex strategies. Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 6: 824–844.
Tsui, Anne. 2007. From homogenization to pluralism: International management research in the Academy and beyond. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50, No. 6: 1353–1364.
Vernon, Raymond. 1983. Two hungry giants: The US and Japan in the quest for oil and ores. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wells, Louis T. Jr. 1983. Third World multinationals: The rise of foreign investment from developing countries. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wilkins, Mira. 1986. Japanese multinational enterprises before 1914. Business History Review, Vol. 60, No. 2: 199–232.
Zaheer, Sri. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, No. 2 (April): 341–363.