Edited by T. M. L. Wigley
Edited by D. S. Schimel
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print Publication Year: 2000
Online Publication Date:December 2009
Chapter DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511573095.007
The CO2 fertilizing effect on vegetation growth arises from primary effects of CO2 concentration on photosynthetic CO2 fixation, suppression of photorespiration (and possibly of dark respiration), and reduction in stomatal conductance. These mechanisms increase the efficiency of use of growth-restricting inputs of light, water, and nitrogen in the formation of dry matter. It is of critical significance that the C:N ratio of plant tissues varies considerably when CO2 is varied. The relative response of plant stand seasonal growth to high CO2 is typically similar to that which would be calculated on basic photosynthetic biochemical and stomatal diffusion grounds. Researchers are still determining the full extent of various negative and positive feedbacks and other factors that accentuate or attenuate the propagation of this primary response into the size of live and dead C pools. However, on the basis of present evidence it seems unjustified to assume that all such modifiers act to annul completely the primary stimulus of high CO2 in terms of increase in C pool sizes. Indeed, the likely magnitude of the CO2 fertilizing effect is such that it can comfortably account for the “missing carbon sink” of approximately 1–2 Gt C/yr, according to several independent terrestrial C cycle models.
For modeling the response of net primary production (NPP) to CO2, there are five approaches. The once common approach of assuming a flat response (i.e., nonresponse) above the preindustrial CO2 concentration of 280 μmol/mol is highly unlikely to be correct.