7 - The climate-justice link: communicating risk with low-income and minority audiences  pp. 119-138

By Julian Agyeman, Bob Doppelt, Kathy Lynn and Halida Hatic

Image View Previous Chapter Next Chapter


In this chapter, we briefly detail the growth of the US environmental justice movement and one of its offshoots, the international climate-justice movement. This movement is attempting to “put a human face” on climate change. The “Bali Principles of Climate Justice” shift climate change from a scientific–technical issue to one of human rights and environmental justice. We then look at how these issues can be communicated in disadvantaged communities: Roxbury, a predominantly African-American area in Boston, Massachusetts; and in poor, rural communities in the western United States documented in a 2001 study by the University of Oregon Program for Watershed and Community Health (now Resource Innovation), focusing on wildfire management and preparedness.

Environmental justice

Environmental justice concerns have been around in North America since the Conquest of Columbus in 1492. Yet, as a social movement, Faber (1998: 1) calls the US environmental justice movement “a new wave of grassroots environmentalism” and Anthony (1998: ix) calls it “the most striking thing to emerge in the US environmental movement.” Whether it developed “in” the environmental movement or “from” the civil rights movement is perhaps a moot point. However, the US environmental justice movement, as opposed to environmental justice concerns, is generally believed to have started around fall 1982, when a large protest erupted in Warren County, North Carolina. The state wanted to dump more than 6,000 truckloads of soil contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) into what was euphemistically described as “a secure landfill.” The protesters came from miles around.

Agyeman, J. (2005). Sustainable Communities and the Challenge of Environmental Justice. New York: New York University Press.
Agyeman, J., Bullard, R., and Evans, B. (2003). Just Sustainabilities: Development in an Unequal World. London: Earthscan/The MIT Press.
Anthony, C. (1998). Foreword. In The Struggle for Ecological Democracy: Environmental Justice Movements in the United States, ed. Faber, D. New York and London: The Guilford Press. pp. ix–xi.
Baer, P., Harte, J., Haya, B., et al. (2000). Equity and greenhouse gas responsibility. Science, 289, 2287.
Bullard, R., Johnson, G., and Torres, A. (eds.) (2000). Sprawl City: Race, Politics and Planning in Atlanta. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts (2002). Environmental Justice Policy. Boston, MA: State House.
Congressional Black Caucus Foundation (CBCF) (2004). African Americans and Climate Change: An Unequal Burden. Oakland, CA: Redefining Progress.
Environmental Justice and Climate Change Initiative (2002). Ten Principles for Just Climate Change. Oakland, CA: Redefining Progress.
Faber, D. (ed.) (1998). The Struggle for Ecological Democracy: Environmental Justice Movements in the United States. New York and London: The Guilford Press.
Geiser, K. and Waneck, G. (1994). PCBs and Warren County. In Unequal Protection: Environmental Justice and Communities of Color, ed. Bullard, R. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books. pp. 43–52.
General Accounting Office (1983). Siting of Hazardous Waste Landfills and Their Correlation with Racial and Economic Status of Surrounding Communities. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Global Commons Institute (2001). Contraction and Convergence: Equity and Survival. London: GCI; available at: http://www.gci.org.uk/refs/C&CUNEPIIIg.pdf, accessed November 9, 2005.
International Climate Justice Network (2002). Bali Principles of Climate Justice. Press Release of August 29, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Kasperson, R. E., Golding, D., and Tuler, S. (1992). Social distrust as a factor in siting hazardous facilities and communicating risks. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 4, 161–87.
Kollmuss, A. and Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8, 239–60.
Lavelle, M. and Coyle, M. (eds.) (1992). Unequal protection: The racial divide in environmental law. National Law Journal, 15 (Special Supplement), 52–4.
Meyer, A. (2000). Contraction & Convergence: The Global Solution to Climate Change. Schumacher Briefing 5. Devon, UK: Green Books.
Mohai, P. (2004). Dispelling old myths: African American concern for the environment. Environment, 45, 5, 10–26.
Mohai, P. and Bryant B. (1998). Is there a “race” effect on concern for environmental quality? Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, 4, 475–505.
Program for Watershed and Community Health (PWCH). (2001). Wildfire and Poverty: An Overview of the Interactions Among Wildfires, Fire-related Programs, and Poverty in the Western States. Eugene, OR: ECONorthwest.
Taylor, D. (2000). The rise of the environmental justice paradigm. American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 4, 508–80.
United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice (1987). Toxic Wastes and Race in the United States. New York: United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice.
United States Census (2000). Roxbury Data Profile; available at: http://www.cityofboston.gov/DND/PDFs/Profiles/Roxbury_PD_Profile.pdf, accessed June 12, 2004.
Vaughan, E. (1995). The significance of socioeconomic and ethnic diversity for the risk communication process. Risk Communication, 15, 2, 169–80.