1 - Weather or climate change?  pp. 31-43

Weather or climate change?

By Ann Bostrom and Daniel Lashof

Image View Previous Chapter Next Chapter


No sooner do we start experiencing the world than the world starts shaping our causal beliefs about it, by providing feedback on our actions, predisposing us to expect certain outcomes from particular actions, and thus to link causes to effects. It is only human to generalize and abstract stories from these. While specific actions and their specific consequences may be misremembered or forgotten (Brown, 1990; Koriat et al., 2000; Loftus et al., 1987), their cumulative legacy includes a set of general causal beliefs, or mental models, of how things work. Mental models are our inference engines, how we simulate sequences of events in our minds and predict their outcomes. Add to this vicarious experiences and adopted beliefs – the effects of science education, advertising, and other communications – and people can explain just about anything, including global warming, through the pre-existing lenses of their mental models.

When it comes to communicating climate change, awareness of our own mental models and those of the people we want to communicate with is key. Why? Because our mental models predispose us toward particular ways of thinking about a problem, its causes, effects, and its solutions. In other words, if we hold in our minds a mental model that wrongly captures what causes a problem, our response to the problem will be equally inappropriate. For example, a “heartburn” mental model of chest pains leads some people to take a digestive aid rather than seek timely medical care for heart attacks.

Aubrun, A. and Grady, J. (2001). The Missing Conceptual Link: Talkback Testing of Simplifying Models for Global Warming. Providence, RI: Cultural Logic.
Böhm, G. (1997). Risk perception in the area of global environmental change events. Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Risk Analysis-Europe, June 15–18, Stockholm, Sweden.
Böhm, G. and Pfister, H.-R. (2001). Mental representation of global environmental risks. Research in Social Problems and Public Policy, 9, 1–30.
Bord R. J., O'Connor, R. E., and Fisher, A. (2000). In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change? Public Understanding of Science, 9, 3, 205–18.
Bostrom, A. and Fischhoff, B. (2001). Communicating health risks of global climate change. In Research in Social Problems and Public Policy, eds. Böhm, G., Nerb, J., McDaniels, T., and Spada, H., special issue of Environmental Risks: Perception, Evaluation, and Management, 9, Amsterdam: JAI, pp. 31–56.
Bostrom, A., Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., et al. (1994). What do people know about global climate change? 1. Mental models. Risk Analysis, 14, 6, 959–70.
Bostrom, M. (2001a). American Attitudes to the Environment and Global Warming: An Overview of Public Opinion. Study conducted for the FrameWorks Institute, Washington, DC.
Bostrom, M. (2001b). Communicating Global Warming: An Analysis of Priming Effects. Study conducted for the FrameWorks Institute, Washington, DC.
Brown, N. R. (1990). Organization of public events in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 297–314.
Cutter, S., Mitchell, J. T., Hill, A., et al. (2003). Attitudes toward reducing greenhouse gas emissions from local places. In Global Change and Local Places: Estimating, Understanding, and Reducing Greenhouse Gases, ed. The Association of American Geographers Global Change in Local Places (GCLP) Research Group, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 171–91.
Emanuel, K. A. (1987). The dependence of hurricane intensity on climate. Nature, 326, 483.
Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., et al. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1, 1–17.
Gentner, D., Holyoak, K. J., and Kokinov, B. K. (eds.) (2001). The Analogical Mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Hagger, M. S. and Orbell, S. (2003). A meta-analytic review of the common-sense model of illness representations. Psychology and Health, 18, 2, 141–84.
Hansen, J. E. (1988). Testimony before U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Greenhouse effect and climate change, 100th Congress, 1st Session, June 23.
Kempton, W. (1991). Lay perspectives on global climate change. Global Environmental Change, 1, 3, 183–208.
Kempton, W. (1997). How the public views climate change. Environment, 39, 9, 12–21.
Koriat, A. and Goldsmith, M. (2000). Toward a psychology of memory accuracy. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 1, 481– 537.
Krosnick, J. A., Holbrook, A. L., and Visser, P. S. (2000). The impact of the fall 1997 debate about global warming on American public opinion. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 239–60.
Löfstedt, R. E. (1991). Climate change perceptions and energy-use decisions in northern Sweden. Global Environmental Change, 1, 4, 321–4.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lazo, J. K., Kinnell, J. C., and Fisher, A. (2000). Expert and layperson perceptions of ecosystem risk. Risk Analysis, 20, 2, 179–93.
Leventhal, H., Diefenbach, M., and Leventhal, E. A. (1992). Illness cognition: Using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognition interactions. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16, 143–63.
Loftus, E. F., Banaji, M. R., Schooler, J. W., et al. (1987). Who remembers what? Gender differences in memory. Michigan Quarterly Review, 26, 64–85.
Maibach, E. and Parrott, R. L. (1995). Introduction. In Designing Health Messages: Approaches from Communication Theory and Public Health Practice. eds. Maibach, E. and Parrott, R. L. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, p. vii.
McDaniels, T., Axelrod, L., and Slovic, P. (1995). Characterizing perception of ecological risk. Risk Analysis, 15, 5, 575–88.
O'Connor, R. E., Bord, R. J., and Fisher, A. (1999). Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Analysis, 19, 3, 461–71.
Pielke Jr., R. A. (2005). What is climate change? Issues in Science and Technology, 20, 4, 2004. Available at http://www.issues.org/issues/20.4/p_pielke.html; accessed February 2, 2006.
Read, D., Bostrom, A., Morgan, M. G., et al. (1994). What do people know about global climate change? 2. Survey studies of educated laypeople. Risk Analysis, 14, 6, 971–82.
Rimal, R. N. and Real, K. (2003). Perceived risk and efficacy beliefs as motivators of change: Use of the risk perception attitude (RPA) framework to understand health behaviors. Human Communication Research, 29, 3, 370–99.
Sherman, J. D. and Booth Sweeney, L. (2002). Cloudy skies: Assessing public understanding of global warming. System Dynamics Review, 18, 2, 207–40. Available at http://web.mit.edu/jsterman/www/cloudy_skies1.pdf; accessed January 14, 2006.
Stott, P. A., Stone, D. A., and Allen, M. R. (2004). Human contribution to the European heatwave of 2003. Nature, 432, 610–14.
Ungar, S. (2000). Knowledge, ignorance and the popular culture: Climate change versus the ozone hole. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 297–312.
Webster P. J., Holland, G. J., Curry, J. A., et al. (2005). Changes in tropical cyclone number, duration, and intensity in a warming environment. Science, 309, 5742, 1844–46.
Williams, J. (2005). Understanding global climate change science. USA Today, August 11. Available at http://www.usatoday.com/weather/climate/wclisci0.htm; accessed December 19, 2005.
Witte, K. (1994). Fear control and danger control: A test of the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM). Communication Monographs, 61, 2, 113–34.