Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print Publication Year: 1995
Online Publication Date:September 2009
Chapter DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511530203.015
Subjects: Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology
Life is the art of drawing conclusions from insufficient premises.Samuel Butler, Notebooks (1912)
Why do some neuropsychiatric patients develop mental and motoric restlessness? What are the determinants of its intensity and duration? What is its pathophysiology? Why do some drugs, used ostensibly to tranquillize behaviourally and emotionally disturbed patients, paradoxically produce restlessness? Why are some drugs that ‘seize the neurone’ disliked by the patients who take them to treat their illnesses? Why are some patients, and families, unable to go to bed for fear of distressing feelings in the legs? How do we help these restless individuals suffer their illnesses in tranquillity? These and many similar questions have been addressed in this book.
The major limitation, repeatedly emphasized, has been the lack of sufficient data. In many ways, the syndromes that we have discussed are too complex and poorly delineated to lend themselves to ‘tight’ research. Many of the phenomena vary from normal behaviours only in degree. Their significantly subjective nature sets up the possibility of trivialization by an unempathic medical and research community. The occurrence of some of the disorders in psychiatrically ill patients further compromises their distinctive nature and associated disability. These are some of the reasons that only a few research groups have attempted to investigate this field. As an example, the contrast between the magnitude of research effort on TD and akathisia in the past 30 years is a testimony to the neglect of ‘restlessness’.