Edited by Desmond A. McCarthy
Edited by Marion G. Macey
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print Publication Year: 2001
Online Publication Date:January 2010
Chapter DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511526985.005
Errors in flow cytometry can only arise from two discrete processes: data acquisition and data analysis. In general, data acquisition errors can be avoided by good sample preparation and accurate instrument set-up. Quality assurance reagents are available to confirm most aspects of sample preparation in routine applications and internal experimental controls should be designed to provide the same level of assurance in experimental applications. Instrument standards, such as fluorescent beads or fixed nuclei, can be used to confirm instrument performance in both settings. The only aspect of data acquisition for which controls are unavailable is the ability of the operator to design the correct experiment. This is obviously common to any analytical procedure but is particularly relevant to applications such as flow cytometry where the only output is a digitised signal presented on a computer screen.
The most common acquisition error made by users of flow cytometers is insufficient data points. Often huge files of list mode data are collected, sometimes with tens of thousands of data points, which, upon analysis, contain mostly debris or irrelevant cells. This is an easily avoided error. The traditional way to guarantee the acquisition of a specific number of cells of interest is to apply an acquisition gate or region based upon one or more characteristics of the cells of interest. This is effective but limits the data analysis solely to the cells that were thought to be of interest at the time of analysis and necessarily excludes any other cell populations that may be of interest subsequently. A more flexible approach requires setting an acquisition region or gate that is used solely for counting.