Adaptive Dynamics of Infectious Diseases
In Pursuit of Virulence Management
Edited by Ulf Dieckmann
Edited by Johan A. J. Metz
Edited by Maurice W. Sabelis
Edited by Karl Sigmund
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print Publication Year: 2002
Online Publication Date:January 2010
Chapter DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511525728.017
Virulence is not a property of the parasite, but of the interaction between host and parasite. Accordingly, the evolution of virulence is the result of a coevolutionary process and to understand it we have to account for both sides. As a result of their generation time, which is usually much shorter than that of the host, microparasites seem to be at a huge advantage. However, sexual reproduction allows host organisms to present a moving target (while at the same time inevitably offering opportunities for parasites to use sexual contacts between hosts to infect new susceptibles). In particular, genetic recombination helps to preserve heterozygosity and leads to a wide diversity of immune responses. But there are many other examples of the intricate struggles between parasite and host and of the trade-offs imposed on them.
Part D explores how reciprocal selection between host and parasite populations influences the evolution of host resistance and parasite virulence. Chapters 13 and 14 deal with parasite–host interactions in which investments in resistance and/or virulence incur a cost. The question here is how the resultant trade-offs influence the coevolutionary process. In Chapters 15 to 17 trade-offs play no role. In these, coevolution acts on the ability of the host to recognize the parasite and discriminate it against cells and tissue of its own, while, at the same time, parasites attempt to bypass recognition by the host. In its simplest form this leads to gene-for-gene coevolution.