Edited by Gregory H. Fox
Edited by Brad R. Roth
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print Publication Year: 2000
Online Publication Date:May 2010
Chapter DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511522307.002
DEVELOPING OVERLAPPING CONSENSUS
In the world that emerged after the collapse of the Fascist and Communist ideologies, the principal cause of war has become unfairness and anomie. How the means of a good life are distributed among peoples and persons and whether people and persons are adequately consulted in the decisions that determine their life-prospects: these are the principal determinants of war and peace.
The role of the State, in an era of increasing transnationalization of big decisions and of the localization of subsidiary ones, is to serve as the forum for that organized social discourse, leading to a high degree of consensus regarding what is fair. That consensus is essential to the avoidance of war: in particular, civil war, the principal form of belligerence in the new era.
The most important instrument for developing overlapping consensus is the voting booth. Attention must therefore be paid to democracy as a right protected by international law and institutions. Democracy does not provide a guarantee against civil war. It merely provides the only known process by which a genuine social discourse can proceed among persons legitimately representing the spectrum of opinions and interests in a community or polis. Without it, there can be decisions. There can even be negotiation and discourse. But there can never be a genuine social convergence.