6 - Spreading liberal constitutionalism: an inquiry into the fate of free speech rights in new democracies  pp. 142-177

Spreading liberal constitutionalism: an inquiry into the fate of free speech rights in new democracies

By Michel Rosenfeld and András Sajó

Image View Previous Chapter Next Chapter



Introduction

The second half of the twentieth century saw a proliferation of transitions from authoritarianism and colonial rule to constitutional democracy in virtually every corner of the world. This phenomenon started shortly before mid-century with Germany, Japan, India, Pakistan, and Israel, and continued several decades later with Greece, Portugal, and Spain. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, it spread through Central and Eastern Europe, followed by the repudiation of dictatorship in several Latin American countries. These various transitions were inspired by, and drew upon, various constitutional traditions, such as the US, British, French, and later, the German. Throughout this process, constitutional norms were ‘exported’ by established constitutional democracies and ‘imported’ into new democracies. Some norms were undoubtedly liberal, while others were not.

In this chapter, we assess the contribution of the transplantation of liberal constitutional norms to the spread and consolidation of liberal constitutionalism. Is the mere importation of such norms sufficient to pave the way for liberal constitutionalism? Or must certain preconditions prevail, or develop subsequently, for transplantation to succeed? Can importation of liberal constitutional norms have a significant impact notwithstanding the concurrent importation of non-liberal constitutional norms, such as those based on communitarian values, social-welfare objectives, or ethnocentric conceptions of citizenship?

A full assessment of the exportability of liberal constitutionalism is fraught with difficulties. A principal difficulty is that there is no agreement on the meaning of liberalism, much less on what rights or values are liberal or on what counts as a liberal interpretation or application of fundamental constitutional rights.